* perf(monitor): improve monitor query and chart performance for large ranges
- enable LTTB sampling in the shared line chart to bound rendered points
- empty io/network in monitor search now means no name filter, returning
all device rows in one query instead of fanning out per device
- merge device names recorded in the monitor db into io/network/gpu
options so removed devices stay selectable; move logic to service layer
- add composite indexes (name, created_at) on monitor_ios/monitor_networks
and (product_name, created_at) on monitor_gpus
- stop migrating the unused MonitorGPU model into MonitorDB
- fix the memory param which was compared against "mem" and never matched
* chore(monitor): remove monitor test fixtures
---------
Co-authored-by: ssongliu <sloooop1x@gmail.com>
Port forwarding no longer shares the filter client. FilterClient keeps only
filter capabilities, and forwarding gets its own adapter, service and boot
replay:
- utils/firewall/forwarding holds the provider adapters. firewalld uses native
forward-port, ufw and iptables share the NAT implementation moved out of
client/iptables/forward.go.
- service/forwarding.go owns base info, search, operate, enable and replay.
The API keeps its routes and dispatches on name/type/operate.
- init/firewall replays forwarding through that service instead of loading NAT
rule files inline.
Also adds 1PANEL_FORWARD to the IptablesOp name enum: the frontend already
sends {"name":"1PANEL_FORWARD","operate":"init-forward"} and the validator
rejected it with 400 before reaching the service. Besides that, the only
observable difference is that a forward-tab search no longer triggers the
port/address record cleanup goroutine on the side.
#### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refs https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/issues/7759
#### Summary of your change
#### Please indicate you've done the following:
- [ ] Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
- [ ] Made sure commit message follow the rule of [Conventional Commits specification](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/).
- [ ] Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.
#### What this PR does / why we need it?
#### Summary of your change
#### Please indicate you've done the following:
- [ ] Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
- [ ] Made sure commit message follow the rule of [Conventional Commits specification](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/).
- [ ] Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.
CN_CoreStebandssongliu
蘭
CityFun
BugPleaseGoandCityFun
HynoR
蘭
Rowan Chen
王贺