camoufox/ci

The test pipeline

Everything that runs a suite against Camoufox. Driven identically from a pull request, a push to main, and — through workflow_call — any caller that needs to test a specific browser version, so there is one definition of "the tests pass", not two.

resolve ──┬─ static ────────── tribal rules, skiplist, self-tests   (seconds)
          ├─ pythonlib ─────── the package's own tests               (a minute)
          └─ build ──┬─ playwright × 6 shards        (conformance + our own)
                     ├─ skiplist audit ───── every skip must still fail
                     ├─ native ───────────── leaks, contexts         (ours)
                     ├─ patch guards ─────── one per spoofing patch
                     ├─ build-tester ─────── 8 fingerprint profiles
                     └─ sundial ──────────── stealth grade  (off: see below)
                                    │
                                 summary ──► one comment on the PR

Which browser, which suite

ci/versions.py answers both, and every entry point uses it:

• browser — from upstream.sh, or whatever a caller passes in. A caller moving to a new Firefox passes the version it is moving to, which is what lets one pipeline test both a pull request and an upgrade.
• suite — the newest released playwright-python tag whose pinned Firefox is not ahead of that browser, and which is below the Playwright ceiling pythonlib/pyproject.toml pins.

Newest-not-ahead, rather than an exact match, because Playwright trails Firefox and skips generations: it pinned Firefox 151 and then 153, never 152, so a browser built on 152 has no exact suite and never will. Requiring a match would leave most of a release cycle with no suite at all, and taking a newer one would test against an automation contract that assumes engine work the build does not have. So the suite's Firefox pin being a release or two behind the browser is the normal case, not a misconfiguration — the summary line says which rule picked the tag.

The ceiling matters for the same reason it exists in pythonlib: camoufox.server imports playwright._impl._driver, a private API, and every Playwright minor is free to change Juggler. Testing above the ceiling would exercise a client the shipped package will not install.

python3 -m ci.versions --json                          # what would run
python3 -m ci.versions --browser-version 153.0.4 --json

The version under test has to be the version that gets built. Only suite selection follows --browser-version; the build reads upstream.sh and the fetch path downloads whatever pythonlib considers current. Asking for a version the branch does not pin would therefore compile the old browser and judge it against the new suite — green, meaningless and silent. --check-upstream refuses that, and the workflow passes it.

So an upgrade to a new Firefox is a branch that edits upstream.sh, which is what an upgrade is anyway. Resolution then reads it by default, the build produces it, and the suite is chosen for it — the three cannot disagree. The browser_version input exists for a caller that wants to state the version explicitly; it must match.

The Playwright suite

One suite, fetched fresh per run: upstream playwright-python at the resolved tag. It runs unmodified — ci/pw_camoufox_plugin.py adapts the environment around it rather than editing it, hooking BrowserType at the _impl layer so upstream can refactor its fixtures freely — and ci/suite.py overlays tests/camoufox/ into it.

tests/camoufox/ is small on purpose: behaviour upstream has no test for (that page.route() must not change what a request looks like on the wire), or asserts the opposite of on purpose (that a worker should not inherit the context locale, which stock Firefox gets wrong and Camoufox does not). It is not a fork of anything, so it cannot go stale; it runs against upstream's own conftest and server at whatever tag was resolved.

tests/ used to hold a fork of a ~v1.55-era upstream suite. It was deleted after measuring it against the same binary:

• 73 of the 74 tests it skipped as "Not supported by Camoufox" pass in upstream's copy. Those skips predated main-world execution and were never revisited, so the fork was asserting the browser was worse than it is.
• Of its passing tests, eight had no upstream counterpart. Six of those were Camoufox-specific and now live in tests/camoufox/ as three modules; the other two were tests upstream had since renamed.

A re-fetched suite cannot drift, and a deliberate difference from upstream now has to be written down in ci/skiplist.yml with a reason, where it is visible, instead of being encoded as a silent edit to a vendored file.

What "the suite" means

ci/run_playwright.py names its targets explicitly rather than pointing at tests/, so the one thing left out stays visible:

tests/async/ + tests/sync/	one pytest process
tests/common/, tests/test_reference_count_async.py	their own process
tests/test_installation.py	excluded, with a reason

The isolated pair each call sync_playwright()/async_playwright() inside the test body, which cannot start while the session fixtures already hold a loop (Cannot run the event loop while another loop is running). Run with the others all six fail; run alone all six pass. Skiplisting them for that would have recorded a browser failure that does not exist.

This used to be tests/async/ alone — 722 tests, 31% of the suite, excluded with nothing written down. Not a decision: the vendored fork carried async/ and no sync suite, and this runner was pointed at the same shape without checking what upstream shipped. unclaimed() now fails the run if upstream adds a test path that is neither in TARGETS nor in EXCLUDED with a reason.

Which world, and the skip list

The suite runs isolated first — the configuration Camoufox actually ships — and falls back to the main world only for what fails, counting every test that needed the fallback.

Upstream asserts upstream semantics: tests read globals their own page scripts defined and pass handles into evaluate(), and a test doing that fails under isolation by design. Running the whole suite main-world-only (the previous behaviour) made those pass, which is true but uninformative — it measured a mode nobody ships and produced no number for what isolation costs.

Each group is therefore run up to three times, and normally twice:

Pass	CI_WORLD	What it establishes
1	isolated	the browser as users run it
2	main	the failures again with isolation off
3	main	only what failed in both, retried once — normally empty

There is deliberately no second isolated pass. One sat between 1 and 2 on the theory that a flake must not be mistaken for a world difference; measured on the first real CI run it cost 7m50s per shard and recovered nothing:

isolated (full)   335s + 331s   35 and 11 failures
isolated retry    205s + 265s   0 recovered      <- deleted
main world         19s +  12s   46 recovered

Two reasons it was never going to earn that. These failures are deterministic — a test reading a global its page script defined does not intermittently see it — and failing that way is slow, because the read returns undefined and the test sits on a Playwright timeout rather than throwing. And upstream's suite already ships pytest-rerunfailures: pass 1 reported 105 rerun, which is each of those 35 failures having been retried three times before the run even reported them. A flake does not survive that.

A test that passes in pass 2 is recorded as a main-world fallback: it counts as a pass for the run, and its identity goes into metrics.main_world_fallbacks, with metrics.main_world_fallback_count on the summary table (summed across shards). A test failing in both worlds and on retry is a plain failure. The fallback count is the isolated-world conformance gap — watch it between runs; a jump means the isolation boundary moved.

Both rerun passes are guarded on the failure set being non-empty, which is load-bearing rather than tidy: pytest declines to filter when nothing it collected previously failed, so an unguarded --last-failed runs the whole group again — in the other world, silently replacing the result it was meant to refine.

Why some isolated failures hang

Not every isolated failure fails. Some wait forever, in both tests/async/test_route_web_socket.py and tests/sync/test_route_web_socket.py — and the two are not equally recoverable, which is the subject of the second half of this section.

The shape recurs, so it is worth stating generally: a Playwright feature implemented by installing something on the page's global lands in the isolated world instead, so anything the page itself originates never reaches the automation. Two instances, both measured directly against a build:

page's own script opens a WebSocket    isolated -> handler never fires   main -> intercepted
page script calls window.exposedFn()   isolated -> HANG                  main -> resolves
evaluate() calls window.exposedFn()    isolated -> resolves              main -> resolves

route_web_socket works by replacing window.WebSocket from an init script; isolated, that replacement lands in the sandbox, so a socket the page opens is never seen. expose_function installs its binding on the sandbox global, so page script calling window.fn() finds nothing — though called from evaluate() it works, which is why that one does not hang here.

They hang rather than fail because the waits involved — a Twisted future from the test server, an asyncio future a binding was meant to resolve — have no Playwright timeout behind them. Everything else isolation breaks fails at Playwright's 30s.

Worth being clear that the route_web_socket half is not a test artifact: a real site's WebSocket is not intercepted either, and the user gets no error saying so. It is not fixable at this layer — the feature works by replacing a page global, which is precisely what an isolated world exists to stop a page from seeing. Tracked in #775; the fix is native interception below the DOM object, which is also the only version of it that stays undetectable.

So pass 1 is cost-bounded, and only pass 1:

Bound	Value	Why
per-test timeout	90s	the slowest test in the whole main-world baseline was 30.4s; only two exceeded 30s and none exceeded 45s. A Playwright action times out at 30s
upstream reruns	off (CI="")	tests/conftest.py sets reruns = 3 whenever $CI is set — the only thing it reads $CI for. The baseline recorded 2 reruns across all 2295 tests; the isolated pass recorded 138 in one shard, all re-running deterministic world differences

Together that turns a hang from up to 4 × 180s into one 90s wait. A flake missed by not rerunning is not lost — it fails pass 1, passes pass 2, and is counted as a fallback. Note that --reruns 0 as an argument would not work: upstream's conftest overwrites config.option.reruns in pytest_configure, so clearing the environment variable is the only lever that holds.

The ones a timeout cannot bound

That bound is not enough for all of them, and it is worth knowing exactly where it stops working. Measured on run 34799668707 with the 90s bound already in place:

Group	Isolated pass	Outcome
tests/async/	completed in 296s	the bound works
tests/sync/	test_should_work_with_ws_close printed pytest-timeout's +++ Timeout +++ banner at exactly 90s	the process then sat for 1h50m, until the job's timeout-minutes killed it

So the signal fires and the test dies; the process does not. pytest-timeout's signal method raises at the next bytecode boundary, and Playwright's sync API is parked in a greenlet switch that never reaches one cleanly — the raise lands inside the dispatcher and wedges it. --timeout-method=thread fires reliably but kills the interpreter, taking the other ~1500 tests in the group with it. There is no per-test timeout value that bounds this.

So those modules are declared, not discovered — ISOLATION_HANGS in ci/run_playwright.py. The isolated pass cannot learn that they hang without hanging, so it is told: they are --ignored out of pass 1 and run directly in the main world (pass 1b), where they pass and are counted as fallbacks exactly as if isolation had failed them honestly. The same tests still run, in the world that can run them.

Why not ci/skiplist.yml. That list means "fails in the most permissive world", and ci/run_skiplist_audit.py enforces it by running every entry with CI_WORLD=main and failing the build on any that pass. A route_web_socket test passes there — the main world is precisely where the feature works — so an entry would be rejected by the audit, and would be untrue as written. The two lists are not interchangeable, and test_isolation_hangs_are_not_in_the_skiplist keeps them apart.

Pass 1b sits above the if not failing: continue guard, deliberately: a group whose isolated pass found nothing would otherwise skip it, and coverage would disappear on exactly the runs that look healthiest.

tests/patches/isolated-evaluate.py still owns the direct coverage of isolated evaluation, and must keep passing regardless. That file is what to check if isolation itself regresses.

ci/run_skiplist_audit.py deliberately runs in the main world: a skiplist entry has to claim a test cannot pass in either world, or the suite would have counted it as a fallback rather than a failure.

Ten tests are deselected outright by ci/skiplist.yml, which requires a stated reason per entry — ci/summarize.py fails the run on an unreasoned one.

A reason is not evidence, so the reasons are checked. The first version of this file inherited all nine tests/async/*.disabled modules from the vendored suite and gave each a plausible justification without running any of them: of the 202 tests it skipped, 193 passed, and seven of the nine modules failed nothing at all. A written reason made them look verified, which is worse than leaving them bare.

ci/run_skiplist_audit.py now runs every entry with the skiplist disabled and fails the build if a skipped test passes. It is cheap precisely because a correct skiplist is short — ten tests, a few seconds — and it is what keeps the list from drifting back into a place failing tests go to disappear.

python3 -m ci.run_skiplist_audit --binary /path/to/camoufox-bin

What remains after the audit, 10 tests: two test_click.py tests where Playwright's stable-position wait races the humanized travel time; six client-certificate tests (async and sync) that need the browser to present a certificate during the TLS handshake — the two that go through the Node driver's own request context instead pass, and are not skipped; and the two upstream expectations that encode a stock-Firefox quirk, replaced by tests/camoufox/.

That client-certificate split is the audit earning its place. The entry was first written as a whole module, because on a local machine all five fail — Node/OpenSSL there rejects the fixture server outright. In CI two of them pass, and the audit failed the build one run after the entry was written. CI is the authority for what fails; a local run is a hypothesis.

Camoufox's own suite

native-tests/ covers what the Playwright suite cannot ask about:

• Leaks. Launch browsers, kill them, prove nothing survived — file descriptors, sockets, child processes, X11 lock files. The real assertion is that cost does not scale with launch count, because that is the shape a leak actually has: a scraper that runs fine for six hours and then dies of EMFILE. Scope is honest: this measures resources held by our process and its children, not Gecko's internal heap.
• Contexts versus browsers. Two contexts in one browser must get different fingerprints; two pages in one context must get the same one. Get this wrong and per-context injection silently degrades to process-global — which passes every single-context test there is. It has happened here before (commit d17c887, "fix screen size leak in contexts").
• Settled decisions. ci/tribal-rules.yml lists choices this project already made, each with the issue or PR that made it, and native-tests/test_tribal_rules.py asserts them. A comment explaining a decision only works on someone who reads it.

Sundial

On since 2026-09-12. sundial 0.5.0 is deployed and serving score mode, and sundial's master branch now deploys itself on push, so merged does mean deployed. It was off for as long as the live build predated score mode: an older sundial ignores ?score=1 and posts the entire report — every vector's id, name, brief, source and value — to whatever collector asked. Receiving that on a public runner and discarding it afterwards is not the guarantee this section describes; not receiving it is. enabled: false in ci/sundial.yml is still the kill switch, and the resolve job checks it before the credential comes into scope, so flipping it back stops the request rather than just the reporting.

The stealth check reports a letter grade and a count. Nothing else leaves ci/run_sundial.py::redact() — not a vector name, description, measured value, source, and not a per-category breakdown either: a table reading "Graphics 3/17" is the most useful single fact an adversary could take from a public CI log.

There are no per-check rows in the results file at all — not even opaque ones. An HMAC does not name a vector, but a map of them still publishes how many distinct checks fail and lets a reader follow one across releases, which is per-vector data wearing a hash. The instruction was a score, so it is a score: regression detection is per-score, via min_pass_rate and a maximum allowed drop. Scope and thresholds live in ci/sundial.yml; only categories Camoufox actually claims are gated.

Everything that leaves redact() is checked against a whitelist at runtime, not a blacklist — a blacklist only stops the leaks somebody already thought of. Adding a field without adding it to _PUBLISHABLE fails the run:

{ "grade": "A", "checks_total": 412, "checks_passed": 403, "pass_rate": 0.978,
  "out_of_scope_failed": 6, "cross_os_total": 24, "cross_os_passed": 5,
  "os": "linux", "sundial_version": "0.3.1", "schema_version": 1 }

Cross-OS detectors are counted, never scored. They read the host machine rather than the disguise: a browser claiming macOS while running on Linux fails them however good its spoofing is, and Camoufox does not claim byte-identical cross-OS emulation. Folding them into one average would mark it down for a promise nobody made, and would hide a real regression behind noise it cannot control. They are reported separately so a drop there reads as "the host shows through more than it did", which is a different conversation.

The run asks sundial for ?auto=1&score=1, so it receives counts and the vectors never cross the wire at all.

Finding out which checks failed

Worth being precise about, because the answer is "you can't, from CI", and that is deliberate rather than an oversight. Score mode's payload is buckets keyed "<Category>|<class>" holding two integers each. It carries no check names and no ids, so a failing check's identity is not something the CI process discards — it is something sundial never sends. Nothing in the artifact, the log, or the sealed report can recover it.

Two steps down from there, both local only:

# which CATEGORY the failures are in -- works with the credential CI already has
python3 -m ci.run_sundial --explain --binary /path/to/camoufox-bin

# which CHECKS -- needs a role sundial serves full reports to
python3 -m ci.run_sundial --explain --allow-full-report --binary /path/to/camoufox-bin

--explain prints to the terminal and never writes to a result file, and is refused outright under GITHUB_ACTIONS: a category-level table is not a vector, but "Graphics 3/17" is still the most useful single fact an adversary could take from a public log, which is exactly why redact() does not publish one.

Order of operations

?score=1 needs a sundial that has it. An older deployment ignores the unknown parameter and posts the whole report; the numbers still come out right and redact() still discards everything identifying, but nothing is classified, so every cross-OS tally reads 0 — which looks like "no host-OS failures" rather than "nobody sorted them". score_mode: false in the result says which it is, and the gate says so in its notes rather than leaving you to notice.

So the dependency runs one way, and setting the GitHub secrets is the last step, not the first:

1. deploy sundial's score mode — done; it ships in 0.5.0, and master now deploys on push
2. gh secret set SUNDIAL_AUTOMATION_KEY -R <repo> for every repository whose CI runs this. Without it the job skips, which is the normal case for a fork pull request
3. flip enabled: true in ci/sundial.yml — done

Two things keep a vector out of a public log, and it is worth separating them, because only one is enforced by the server:

	guarantee
server-side	The run logs in as guest, and sundial's middleware refuses guest the private-vector bundle outright — those definitions are never served to the session.
client-side	This gate only ever requests /?auto=1&score=1, and redact(require_score_mode=True) fails the run if a full report arrives anyway, rather than folding it down and carrying on.

The stricter option is sundial's score-only ci role, which is refused anything but /?auto=1&score=1 server-side and so cannot be handed a report even if the credential leaks. That role is not in sundial's master branch and is therefore not deployed; when it lands, mint the credential (make pages-ci, then redeploy) and set SUNDIAL_USERNAME=ci. Nothing in this repository changes — the client-side half already behaves as though the server were enforcing it.

There are deliberately no per-vector rows, not even opaque ones. An HMAC names nothing, but a map of them publishes how many distinct checks fail and lets a reader follow the same id from release to release.

The cost is real: regression detection drops from per-vector ("the check that passed last release fails now") to per-score ("we got worse"), covered by min_pass_rate in ci/sundial.yml — and, once an auto-update pipeline exists to compare releases, by a maximum allowed drop in its policy file. To get the per-vector view back for your own debugging, set SUNDIAL_REPORT_AGE_RECIPIENT to an age public key — the full report is then kept encrypted to you and nobody else can open it.

Needs SUNDIAL_AUTOMATION_KEY (the password). SUNDIAL_USERNAME is optional and names the account, which is not a secret — it defaults to guest. Absent the password — a pull request from a fork — the job is skipped and the summary says so.

What actually stops a vector reaching the log

Asking for ?score=1 is a promise the caller makes, and a promise is not a mechanism. Today two things back it:

• guest cannot load the private vectors, and that is checked. sundial's middleware answers isPrivateVectorAsset paths with an empty stub for that role specifically. admin and private do get them — and /automated?key= resolves to private when handed the private key, which is indistinguishable from the guest one by looking at it. So "we set the right key" stays an assumption until something checks: the gate reads sundial's own /__auth/me and refuses to open the browser at all unless the session is a role the vectors are withheld from. Not knowing the role counts as not safe.
• A non-score payload fails the run. redact(require_score_mode=True) refuses to process a full report rather than folding it down, so a deployment that ignored score=1 is a red build, not a quiet leak.

What is still missing is a server that refuses the request. sundial's score-only ci role does exactly that — a bare /, auto=1 without score=1, ?mode=raw, ?download=true, ?key=, the /automated and /locale export routes, and any parameter not on its allow-list each get a 403, and on the pages it does serve the report is never written to a global, so there is nothing for page.evaluate, devtools or a screenshot to read. That role is not merged into sundial's master and so is not deployed. When it is, set SUNDIAL_USERNAME=ci; nothing here changes, because this side already behaves as though the server were enforcing it.

The distinction is worth keeping straight: under guest, dropping score=1 by accident would put the whole report in the collector and leave redact() as the only thing between it and a public artifact. Under ci, the same mistake is a 403 at the first request. --allow-full-report exists for a deliberate local run under an account that is allowed one.

Blocking a merge

Branch protection on main requires exactly one check: All tests passed, the gate job. Pointing at one job instead of a dozen means the required-check list does not need editing every time a suite is added, renamed, or resharded.

The gate allows exactly three skips, each for a stated reason:

Skipped	Because
build	the browser was fetched, not compiled
fetch-browser	the browser was compiled, not fetched
sundial	disabled in ci/sundial.yml, or a fork pull request with no stealth credentials

Anything else that is not success fails it — including skipped. A suite that did not run has not passed, and quietly skipping one is the cheapest route to a green tick.

build is also the one suite dropped from --require when the browser was fetched rather than compiled: that job writes no result, and requiring a name nothing produces fails a run where everything passed.

One suite may additionally record a skip result without failing the run, named explicitly in --allow-skip: sundial, and only when sundial itself is unreachable. It is a separate service on a separate host, so an outage there means this browser was never measured — neither a pass nor a failure is true, and blocking every merge in the repository on someone else's downtime is the wrong answer. The summary shows it as skipped with the reason. A rejected credential, a role that would be served the private vectors, a full report where a score was requested, or a score under the floor all still fail: those are answers, and an answer gets judged.

The settings live in ci/branch-protection.json so they are reviewable rather than lore. To apply them (needs admin):

gh api -X PUT repos/<owner>/<repo>/branches/main/protection \
  --input ci/branch-protection.json

Two choices worth knowing about:

• enforce_admins: false — you can still merge when CI itself is broken. Protection should stop mistakes, not lock you out of your own repository.
• strict: false — a pull request does not have to be rebased onto the latest main before merging. With true, every push to main would invalidate every open pull request and force another build, and a build here is over an hour cold.

Reviews are deliberately not required: a solo maintainer cannot approve their own pull request, so requiring one would block every merge.

Cost control

Each tier gates the next, so a two-second lint failure never reaches the build:

0  static    lint, self-tests, settled decisions        seconds
1  unit      pythonlib                                  ~1 min
2  browser   build  (patches/additions/settings/assets/upstream.sh/Makefile/scripts changed)
             fetch  (anything else -- driver changes test against the published release)
3a smoke     patch guards, build-tester                 ~15 min
3b full      Playwright x2, leaks, stealth              ~40 min
4  gate      the required check

Driver-only pull requests never build. There is nothing new to compile, so fetch-browser downloads the published release and the browser suites run against the build users are actually on — a minute instead of seventy.

Changing Juggler's JavaScript does not rebuild the browser. Measured on a real build: ccache reported a 98.63% hit rate, so almost none of those 24 minutes was compiling C++ — it was Rust, linking libxul, and packaging, none of which a .js file affects. And in the unpackaged dist/bin that CI archives there is no omni.ja at all: Juggler is loose files under chrome/juggler/, so delivering new JavaScript is a file copy.

So the build cache is keyed on a hash of the compiled inputs only (ci/browser_inputs.py). If that hash matches, the compiled half is identical by construction — no diff required, and no dependence on what the pull request base happened to contain — and this branch's resources are laid over the restored browser. A Juggler JavaScript change costs about a minute instead of twenty-four.

Two things make that dangerous, and both are closed and mutation-tested:

Trap	What closes it
additions/juggler/ is not all JavaScript — it holds the screencast encoder and the debugging pipe (5 .cpp, 5 .h, 2 .idl, 3 components.conf, 4 moz.build)	Only files jar.mn actually lists are resources. Everything else — including any extension nobody has considered yet — is native and forces a build. jar.mn itself is native, so removing an entry cannot leave a stale file behind
The source→destination mapping is per-file, not a prefix	It is read from jar.mn. TargetRegistry.js → content/TargetRegistry.js (a level added), content/FrameTree.js → content/content/FrameTree.js (preserved), content/JugglerFrameChild.sys.mjs → content/JugglerFrameChild.sys.mjs (dropped). Two files in one source directory landing at different depths is exactly what a prefix rule gets wrong — and it would run stale Juggler while every suite went green

A browser that is already built is not built again. browser_changed is computed against the pull request's base, so it stays true for every push to a branch that touched patches/ even once. That is right — the published release does not contain that branch's browser changes, so it cannot be tested against — but taken alone it meant recompiling a byte-identical browser on every push, 24 minutes at a time, to fix a typo in ci/.

The build job therefore asks a narrower question first: not "does this branch change the browser" but "has the browser changed since the last one we built". The answer is a cache keyed on a hash of every input that can alter the binary — the same path list browser_changed uses, plus this workflow, which pins the toolchain. On a hit, a 634 MB camoufox-dist.tar.zst is restored and every build step is skipped; the run still records a build result saying the browser was restored rather than compiled, because a required suite that reports nothing fails the gate, and "nothing was compiled" should be a fact in the evidence rather than a hole in it.

Deliberately no restore-keys on that cache. Everywhere else a partial match is fine — a partly warm ccache is still warm — but here it would hand the test jobs a browser built from different sources, and every suite would report on it looking perfectly healthy. A self-test asserts the key covers every path browser_changed considers browser-affecting, so the two cannot drift apart.

The ccache is kept warm from main. Pushes to main populate it and a twice-weekly schedule keeps it from being evicted (GitHub drops a cache after seven days unused). Pull requests restore it through restore-keys, so a build in a pull request starts warm even though its own key is new.

A prebuilt image in ghcr.io with the object cache baked in would be warmer still and would not need the eviction guard. It also needs registry credentials and a rebuild pipeline of its own; this is the version that works with no setup.

Preparing the tree retries the network, and nothing else. mach bootstrap pulls toolchains from Taskcluster, and a connection reset there used to fail the whole pull request. ci.run_prepare runs setup-minimal → dir → mozbootstrap, retrying the two that download things and only when the failure text reads as transient. A failed patch hunk or a compile error still fails on the first attempt — retrying a broken tree only spends a runner to reach the same answer, and a retry loop that swallows a real breakage turns a red build into a slow red build.

One consequence of cancel-in-progress: pushing to a branch cancels its running build. That is right while iterating, but a 70-minute build will not survive a push made 20 minutes in.

Running a piece by hand

python3 -m ci.run_playwright --binary path/to/camoufox-bin
python3 -m ci.run_playwright --binary path/to/camoufox-bin --shard 3/6
python3 -m ci.run_native     --subset rules            # no browser needed
python3 -m ci.run_native     --subset browser --binary path/to/camoufox-bin
python3 -m ci.run_sundial    --binary path/to/camoufox-bin
python3 -m ci.summarize      --results-dir .ci-work/results

Each writes one result file to .ci-work/results/. ci/summarize.py folds the shards, decides, and renders the table. A required suite that produced no result file is a failure, never a skip — otherwise deleting a job would be the cheapest way to a green tick.

Self-tests

ci/tests/ asserts the pipeline reports honestly: redaction leaks nothing, skips carry reasons, shards partition exactly once, version resolution never picks a suite newer than the browser. These run in the static job on every pull request.