mirror of
https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve.git
synced 2026-11-04 16:09:05 +00:00
9bf7164e2b68ed5c277f0235dfbbce1a8268bd2a
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
9bf7164e2b |
ci: capture UI (Playwright) per-test counts (ci_test_runs) (#12915)
## What Capture **UI (Playwright) per-test counts** in the `ci_test_runs` OpenObserve stream — `tests_total/passed/failed/flaky/skipped` per run. This was meant to land in #12914 but missed that squash-merge (pushed just after), so it's its own PR now. Companion: o2-enterprise#2046. ## How - `playwright.yml` merge job gains a `stats` output (from the merged `report.json`). - `report_to_openobserve` reads it and emits the test-count fields via a small generic **`EXTRA_JSON`** merge hook added to `o2-run-report.sh`. - Non-fatal as before; no-ops when secrets are unset. API (pytest) counts are not included (would need `--junitxml` + XML aggregation — separate change). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
94f6aab74e |
ci: live retry-aware metrics for playwright, api-testing + regression (#12914)
## What Makes the per-run test dashboards **live**. Adds non-fatal `report_to_openobserve` jobs that emit **one retry-aware run-summary doc per run** to OpenObserve, following the metrics work merged earlier (regression/docgen/council). Companion PR in the other repo mirrors this. **Scope (this PR):** 1. **`playwright.yml` + `api-testing.yml`** → new report jobs → `ci_test_runs` (`suite=ui` / `suite=api`). 2. **`playwright_regression.yml`** → retry-aware reporting → `ci_regression` (OSS: augments the existing job; ENT: adds the job — was uninstrumented). ## How it works - **Shared `.github/scripts/o2-run-report.sh`** (used by playwright/api) derives the run's `conclusion` from job results, wall-clock from the jobs API, and **sums cost across all attempts**. Regression jobs do the same inline (they also emit shard/build/test fields). - Emits: `run_id`, `run_attempt`, `retries`, `was_retried`, `conclusion`, `suite`, `repo`, `branch`, `author`, `commit_sha`, `pr_number`, `trigger`, `final_duration_sec`, `total_duration_sec`, `retry_wasted_sec`. - **Dedup model:** re-runs append one doc per attempt; dashboards keep the **latest attempt per `run_id`** via `row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY run_id ORDER BY run_attempt DESC)`. Retries become an *attribute*, never duplicate rows; `total_duration_sec` on the kept row carries cumulative compute. - **Safe by construction:** `continue-on-error` + the never-fail poster — can't fail/slow a test run; skips when no tests ran; **no-ops until `O2_REPORTING_*` secrets are set**. ## Review AI review addressed (mktemp payload, `GH_TOKEN` guard, non-negative duration clamp). YAML + jq unit-tested + `actionlint` clean on the added jobs. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
bfade1f4f3 |
ci: report regression run metrics to OpenObserve (ci_regression) (#12912)
## What
Adds a CI→OpenObserve metrics sidecar to the Playwright Regression
workflow. A new terminal job `report_to_openobserve` emits **one summary
JSON document per run** into the `ci_regression` OpenObserve stream, so
we can build reliability/performance dashboards.
This is the OSS half of a cross-repo change — the companion
o2-enterprise PR (`ci/o2-reporting`) instruments the DocGen and E2E
Council engines into `ci_docgen` / `ci_council`.
## How it works (safe by construction)
- **Non-invasive:** derives per-job timings + per-shard pass/fail from
the GitHub jobs API and the merged Playwright stats. The only edit to an
existing job is one additive `stats` output on
`merge_and_upload_reports`.
- **Cannot break CI:** the job is `continue-on-error` and posts through
`.github/scripts/o2-report.sh`, which always `exit 0`s (a missing secret
/ rotated passcode / unreachable host only warns).
- **No-ops until secrets exist** — safe to merge first.
## Metrics captured
Reliability (conclusion, shard pass/fail, test pass/fail/flaky/skipped),
duration & cost (wall-clock, `runner_seconds`, build time, per-shard
durations), throughput (trigger/actor/branch).
## Required secrets (this repo + o2-enterprise)
- `O2_REPORTING_INGEST_BASE` — `https://<host>/api/<org>`
- `O2_REPORTING_AUTH` — `base64("email:passcode")`
Full schema, dashboard SQL, and setup notes:
`.github/scripts/O2-REPORTING.md`.
## Validation
- YAML parse + jq unit tests + `actionlint` clean on the added code.
- Live **HTTP 200** test-ingest into the target instance, both via raw
curl and through the poster script.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
0ee8a667c2 |
test: E2E Council Refiner — remediate Sentinel findings instead of dead-ending (#12876)
## Why
The E2E Council blocked **#12857** (no test PR opened) because the
post-heal **Sentinel re-audit found 2 critical quality issues** — even
though **9/10 tests passed**. The tests were **not worthless**; 2 just
*under-claimed* (the body asserted something weaker than the test name
promised):
1. `"should not persist FTS default across page reload"` — re-searches
after reload and asserts the column visible, which passes whether it
*persisted* or *re-resolved*. Never verifies non-persistence.
2. `"should clear FTS marker and re-resolve for new stream on stream
change"` — only checks "table rendered", never that FTS actually
re-resolved.
Blocking was correct (green ≠ meaningful), but a **dead-end block throws
away the other 90%**. The pipeline should **fix the problem and make it
right**, not give up. A no-PR outcome should be a *true last resort*.
## What — The Refiner (Phase 5.5)
A remediation loop **inside `verify_heal`**, after the Sentinel re-audit
and before the quality gate (**reuses the already-booted binary** — no
rebuild):
- **Only fires when needed.** If the re-audit is clean (PASS / 0
critical), the step reads the verdict, sets `ran=false`, and exits —
**no DeepSeek call, no test re-run**. Cheap on the happy path.
- **Strengthen-first.** Feeds the exact Sentinel findings to the
Refiner, which **adds/tightens assertions** so each test verifies what
its name promises → re-runs on the live binary (**green must hold**) →
re-checks assertion-integrity → re-audits. Capped at **2 rounds**.
- **Anti-laundering (the whole game).** Assertions may only be
**ADDED/strengthened — never dropped, inverted in place, or
renamed-to-dodge** a missing assertion. If strengthening goes red
because the **feature isn't wired**, it takes the honest `test.fixme` +
evidence exit (no green-wash).
- **`assert_integrity.py --strengthen`**: permits *added* negative
matchers (assert-absence is legit strengthening) while **still blocking
any dropped assertion** (removed/skipped guards + all static checks
stay). Unit-proven in the commit.
- **Quality gate** now judges the **post-refine** state; blocks only if
the Refiner couldn't keep the spec green honestly.
- **No-PR report** now phrases a block as a true last resort ("the
Refiner attempted to strengthen … but could not resolve every finding
honestly").
### Reuse path (clobber off)
`verify_heal` now also runs on **reuse runs**, and the "already covered"
short-circuit is suppressed on reuse — so **re-running `/e2e` on a
previously-BLOCKED spec re-validates + refines the existing tests into a
PR** instead of stopping at "already covered". No new tests are added on
reuse; the Refiner only strengthens what's there. (Cost: a reuse run
rebuilds even when tests were already perfect — acceptable since re-runs
are explicit; can add a "skip if a green test PR already exists" guard
later.)
## Validation
- `assert_integrity.py` unit-checked: added negative → FAIL without
`--strengthen`, PASS with it; dropped assertion → still FAIL with
`--strengthen`.
- Workflow YAML validated; step order confirmed **Sentinel re-audit →
Refiner → Quality gate**.
- Live end-to-end best validated by re-running `/e2e` on **#12857 with
clobber off** — the Refiner should strengthen the 2 flagged tests and
open the PR.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
900ebe67c6 |
ci(e2e-council): test-quality gate — stop certifying green-but-worthless specs (#12722)
## The problem (from the #12719 review) The pipeline's only hard gate was **"the Healer's authoritative run is green."** That objective *rewards* making a spec pass by gutting the assertions that test the feature. In #12719 the result was a suite that: - dropped the fix-query-card assertion, - asserted `count >= 0` (a tautology), - buried real assertions inside `if`s whose `else` just logs, and - **asserted the feature is absent** (`expectFixQueryCardNotVisible`) — certifying a half-built feature and set to **turn red when the feature is finished**. > A passing test and a valuable test are different things, and we only measured the first. This PR makes **"done" mean "the tests would fail if the feature were broken."** ## Deterministic backbone (no LLM) — `.github/scripts/assert_integrity.py` The most important guards don't depend on the model behaving: - **Diff-aware heal guard** — snapshot the spec's assertions *before* healing; **reject** any heal that **deleted**, **inverted** (`toBeVisible` → `not.toBeVisible`), or **skipped** assertions to reach green. - **Static anti-patterns** — tautologies (`count >= 0`, `expect(true)`) and **conditional-only** tests (every `expect` inside an `if` → the test can pass asserting nothing). - Conservative by design (only high-confidence patterns) — a gate with false positives gets disabled by humans. Restored from a **trusted ref** in verify_heal (never the PR tree's copy). ## Workflow - New **Assertion-integrity gate** after the authoritative run + a combined **Quality gate decision** (integrity **+** Sentinel verdict). `pr_back` now requires `quality_status == pass` → a green-but-worthless spec **never becomes a PR**. - The post-heal **Sentinel re-audit now feeds the blocking gate** (was advisory-only). LLM flakiness fails **open**; the deterministic gate is the hard teeth. - **`feature-incomplete`** honest exit: when a test can't pass because the feature isn't wired, the Healer parks it `test.fixme` + writes **evidence**; the workflow opens **no PR** and posts the gap (file:line) on the source PR — the single highest-value output. - `pr_back` **reconciles `test-summary.json` against the FINAL spec** (drops phantom rows) so the PR body can't claim tests that don't exist. ## Prompts - **Healer:** hard anti-weakening rules + the `feature-incomplete` honest exit. - **Sentinel:** tautology / conditional-only / negative-only-on-feature / name-mismatch as **CRITICAL** checks. - **Engineer:** no dead page-object scaffolding; ban `waitForTimeout` as a sync primitive; assertions must be real and match the test name. - **Architect:** one spec = one area (no Frankenstein specs); de-duplicate scenarios. ## Considered and deferred: mutation-sanity (extra feature-absent build) Theoretically the cleanest definition of a valuable test, but **dropped for now**: it overlaps the cheap static checks, has **no clean "feature-absent" baseline** under merged/multi-PR input, risks false positives that erode trust, and doubles the build. The static guards catch the same #12719 failures at near-zero cost; prevention (Healer can't invert + honest `feature-incomplete`) beats the expensive detector. ## Testing - `assert_integrity.py` unit-tested against tautology / conditional-only (incl. single-line) / heal-removed / heal-inverted fixtures, with no false positive on a legit `if` + unconditional `expect`. - Workflow YAML validated; analyzer compiles. - **First live run still needed** (per the project's "run the path before done" rule) — to see the gate block a real weak spec and the `feature-incomplete` comment fire. Stacked on #12716 (ENT sister flow); the diff collapses to just the quality program once #12716 lands. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |