Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Translation Management
Automated translation system for OpenObserve using DeepSeek (an LLM) via its OpenAI-compatible API.
Overview
This system automatically translates the English locale file (en-US.json) into multiple languages. It intelligently preserves existing translations and only translates new keys, making it safe to run repeatedly.
🚀 How It Works
Translations are generated inside the PR that changes en-US.json:
- Developer updates
en-US.jsonon a branch and opens a PR - The PR is reviewed as normal. No translation run happens yet — see When the run fires for why
- The author clicks "Merge when ready" (or marks a draft ready for review)
- Translation script runs using DeepSeek to update all language files
- A commit is pushed back onto the PR's own branch (
chore(i18n): update translations from en-US.json) - The PR merges as a unit — English strings and their translations land together
- The merge queue double-checks via the separate Verify Translations workflow, which blocks the merge if any string is still untranslated
This means translations are always up-to-date without any manual intervention, and they are reviewed by the person who added the English strings — no ownerless follow-up PR to chase.
When the run fires
The generation workflow triggers on the auto_merge_enabled and ready_for_review
pull-request types, not on every push.
It used to run on every push that changed en-US.json. The problem was not the
translation job itself — that is cheap — but its commit: pushing to the PR branch
re-runs the PR's entire check suite (playwright, unit-tests, api-testing, …) on the
new head SHA. On a PR where you iterate on English strings five times, that is five
extra full CI cycles, and then the merge queue runs everything a sixth time. Firing
once, at the point you signal the PR is finished, collapses that to one.
Why not run it in the merge queue itself? That is the obvious idea and it cannot
work. Merge-queue branches (gh-readonly-queue/*) are read-only, and the commits in a
queue entry are frozen — the entire point of a merge queue is that what gets tested is
exactly what gets merged. A merge_group run has nowhere to put the translation
commit. Pushing to the PR's branch from a merge_group run is worse: it ejects the
PR from the queue, so everything behind it waits while it re-queues.
So the queue gets a check instead of a generator — Verify Translations, which
compares en-US.json against the locale files and .translation_state.json. It makes
no API calls, needs no API key, and installs nothing, so it costs a few seconds.
Supported Languages
The list lives in LANGUAGE_NAMES in translator.py — that dict is the single
source of truth for both the locale codes and the language names used in the prompt.
- 🇸🇦 Arabic (ar-SA)
- 🇹🇷 Turkish (tr-TR)
- 🇨🇳 Simplified Chinese (zh-CN)
- 🇹🇼 Traditional Chinese (zh-TW)
- 🇫🇷 French (fr-FR)
- 🇪🇸 Spanish (es-ES)
- 🇩🇪 German (de-DE)
- 🇮🇹 Italian (it-IT)
- 🇵🇹 Portuguese (pt-PT)
- 🇯🇵 Japanese (ja-JP)
- 🇰🇷 Korean (ko-KR)
- 🇳🇱 Dutch (nl-NL)
- 🇷🇺 Russian (ru-RU)
- 🇵🇱 Polish (pl-PL)
- 🇻🇳 Vietnamese (vi-VN)
How It Works
- Source File: All translations originate from
web/src/locales/languages/en-US.json - Translation: New/changed keys are translated by DeepSeek, in batches, with
interpolation placeholders (
{count},%s,@:linked.key) and vue-i18n literal escapes ({'{'},{'@'}) validated per string - Context: every string is sent together with its i18n key path (so a bare
"Open" under
alerts.incidents.statusOpentranslates as a status, not a verb) and the prompt carries theTERMSglossary (an "event" is a record, not a party; a "stream" is a data stream, not a brook — plus per-locale pinned renderings like zh-CNevent→事件) and the locale's own established module names mined from itsmenu.*translations (zh-CN: Alerts → 告警, Pipelines → 流水线, Dashboards → 仪表盘) - Preservation: Existing translations are never overwritten unless their English source changed
- Nested Support: Handles nested JSON structures correctly
A translation is rejected (and retried on the next run) when it is empty, drops or
adds an interpolation token, changes the | plural-form count, or is something
vue-i18n cannot compile. That last check exists because vue-i18n compiles messages
just-in-time and a compile error is thrown, not warned: a model that helpfully
localises a placeholder name — {identifier} → {标识符} — blanks every page that
renders the string. web/src/locales/localeMessages.spec.ts re-checks the same
property against the committed locale files, so a bad string cannot reach main
even if it predates this validation.
Local Development
Prerequisites
- Python 3.11+
- DeepSeek API key exported as
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY
Setup
cd scripts/translations
pip3 install -r requirements.txt
Configure the API key for Local Development
export DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=your_api_key
# optional overrides:
export DEEPSEEK_MODEL=deepseek-v4-flash # model id
export DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://api.deepseek.com
export TRANSLATION_BATCH_SIZE=50 # strings per API call
export TRANSLATION_CONCURRENCY=4 # batches in flight per locale (1 = serial)
Running Translations
Translate all languages:
cd scripts/translations
python3 main.py
Translate specific languages:
cd scripts/translations
python3 main.py fr-FR es-ES de-DE
See what is pending without translating anything — no API key, no dependencies, no cost. This is exactly what the merge-queue gate runs:
cd scripts/translations
python3 main.py --check # exits 2 if anything is pending, 0 if clean
GitHub Actions Workflow
There are two workflows, with different jobs.
update-translations.yml — generates
- Trigger: a pull request whose
web/src/locales/languages/en-US.jsondiffers from the base branch, on theauto_merge_enabledandready_for_reviewtypes only — i.e. when you click Merge when ready or take a draft out of draft. Plus manualworkflow_dispatchfrom a feature branch. - Branches: the PR's own head branch. Same-repo PRs only — see Fork PRs.
- Secrets:
DEEPSEEK_API_KEYand the push PAT. - Action:
- Runs the Python translation script (retrying failed strings in-process)
- Updates all language JSON files
- Commits them onto the PR branch as
chore(i18n): update translations from en-US.json
verify-translations.yml — gates
- Trigger: every pull request and every
merge_groupentry. Nopaths:filter — a required check that gets filtered out sits at "Expected — waiting for status" forever and blocks the PR. - Secrets: none, deliberately. It runs for fork PRs, so it holds nothing worth stealing.
- Action: runs
main.py --check, which is a pure file comparison — no API calls, no API key, nopip install(theopenaiimport is lazy). A few seconds, zero tokens. - Result: on a PR it reports and stays green (pending strings are normal
mid-review). In the merge queue it fails, ejecting the entry rather than letting
English-only strings reach
main.
Make Verify translations are up to date a required status check on
main. Nothing about this design guarantees anything until you do — that is the single configuration step this PR depends on.
Run lifecycle guarantees
These properties of the workflow matter when you are reading a run:
- A superseding run cancels the one in flight, and the cancelled run commits
nothing. The concurrency group is keyed on the PR number with
cancel-in-progress: true, and the commit steps are gated on!cancelled()— deliberately notalways(), which would include cancellation and let the superseded run race the newer one to push partially-written locale files. The surviving run re-derives the full pending set from.translation_state.json, so a cancelled run loses spend, never progress. - Failed strings are retried inside the same run, up to three attempts. Each
attempt re-derives what is pending from state, so it only re-sends the strings that
actually failed — a retry after a near-complete run is nearly free. This has to
happen in-process now: the workflow no longer fires on
synchronize, so its own commit does not bring it back for another go. - Partial progress is still shipped. Locale files are written atomically, one
locale at a time. A run that is still incomplete after three attempts commits the
locales it finished and marks the commit
Translation-Run: partial, so a later re-run picks the rest up instead of being short-circuited by the skip-guard. The merge-queue gate is what stops that PR merging in the meantime. - The push re-runs the PR's checks. The commit is pushed with a user PAT rather
than
GITHUB_TOKEN, because GitHub deliberately does not trigger workflows forGITHUB_TOKENpushes — the new head SHA would carry no status checks and required checks could never pass. - A deleted head branch is never recreated. If the PR merges mid-run, the job
checks that the branch still exists on origin before pushing and bails with a
warning rather than resurrecting it as a stray. Those strings stay pending for the
next PR that touches
en-US.json.
Setup Requirements
The workflow needs two repository secrets:
| Secret | Value | Why |
|---|---|---|
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY |
Your DeepSeek API key | Authenticates the translation calls |
TRANSLATIONS_APPROVE_TOKEN |
Fine-grained PAT for a real user account, scoped to this repository only with Contents: read and write |
Pushes the translation commit so the PR's checks re-run |
Set them under Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions → New repository secret
(or via gh secret set …). The workflow fails fast with a clear error if
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY is missing; if TRANSLATIONS_APPROVE_TOKEN is missing it falls
back to GITHUB_TOKEN, which still commits the translations but leaves the PR's
checks unre-run on the new head SHA.
Why the PAT must be fine-grained
This workflow triggers on pull_request, which runs from the PR's merge ref — so
requirements.txt, main.py, translator.py and this workflow file itself come
from the PR, not from main. (That is the difference from pull_request_target,
which always uses the base branch's workflow definition.) A same-repo PR can therefore
change anything about what runs in this job. Fork PRs are skipped and
would not receive secrets in any case, so the blast radius is "anyone with push
access" — but a classic repo-scope PAT belonging to a human account grants far more
than that, across every repository they can reach. Scope it down.
Three things in the workflow narrow the exposure. None of them is a boundary — a PR that edits the workflow file can undo all three — but they mean an accidental leak (a dependency that phones home, a stack trace with the environment in it) has much less to reach:
actions/checkoutruns withpersist-credentials: false, so the push token is not sitting in.git/configwhile PR-authored Python runs.- The token is a step-level
env:on the commit step only — nothing above it, includingpip installandpython3 main.py, has it in the environment. requirements.txtcarries an upper version bound so a major release cannot land unreviewed. (Full hash pinning viapip install --require-hashesis the stronger form and is still worth doing.)
The only real boundary is a workflow_run split: this workflow produces the locale
files as an artifact and holds no secrets that survive it, and a second workflow —
which workflow_run always runs from main's definition, never the PR's — holds the
push token and does the commit. Until that lands, the security model here is "every
account with push access to this repo is trusted with both secrets", and the
fine-grained PAT is what keeps that from meaning "trusted with a human's whole GitHub
account".
Fork PRs
A fork PR's branch lives in the contributor's repository, which no token in this
workflow can push to, so the job is skipped for fork PRs. Handle those by running
the workflow manually (workflow_dispatch) once the branch is available locally, or
by letting the next same-repo PR that touches en-US.json pick the keys up — the
state file makes it translate everything still pending, not just that PR's strings.
Workflow Behavior
graph TD
A[PR opened / pushed] --> V[Verify Translations runs<br/>reports pending, stays green]
V --> P[Review happens - no API spend yet]
P --> A2["Author clicks Merge when ready<br/>(or marks a draft ready)"]
A2 --> C{en-US.json differs<br/>from the base branch?}
C -->|No| E[No generation run is created]
C -->|Yes| B{Head commit is a complete<br/>translation commit?}
B -->|Yes| G2[Skip - nothing to do]
B -->|No, or marked partial| D[Translate pending keys only<br/>retrying failures up to 3x]
D --> L{Cancelled by a<br/>superseding run?}
L -->|Yes| M[Commit nothing -<br/>the newer run redoes it]
L -->|No| I[Commit onto the PR branch<br/>marked partial if any string failed]
I --> J[Push re-runs the PR's checks - ONCE]
J --> Q[PR enters the merge queue]
G2 --> Q
Q --> R{Verify Translations<br/>in merge_group}
R -->|Pending strings| S[Block - eject from queue]
R -->|All translated| K[Merged with its translations]
Workflow Execution Order:
- PR opened / pushed →
Verify Translationsreports what is pending. Green either way; no generation, no API spend - Author signals the PR is done → GitHub's
paths:filter decides whether a generation run is created - Script reconciles
en-US.jsonagainst.translation_state.json- New / changed keys: translated
- Everything else: kept, never re-sent to the API
- If any file changed → one commit pushed onto the PR's head branch, which re-runs the PR's checks exactly once
- Merge queue →
Verify Translationsblocks if anything is still untranslated - The PR merges carrying both the English strings and their translations
Key Features:
- ✅ Cheap trigger - a PR without
en-US.jsonchanges creates no generation run - ✅ One extra CI cycle per PR - not one per edit to
en-US.json - ✅ Free gate - the merge-queue check makes no API calls and installs nothing
- ✅ Smart detection - only new or modified keys are translated
- ✅ Owned and reviewed - translations land in the author's PR, not an ownerless follow-up PR
- ✅
mainis never missing translations - enforced by the merge-queue gate, once you make it a required check - ✅ Crash safe - failed strings are retried in-process; whatever completes is still committed
- ✅ Cancel safe - a superseded run commits nothing, so it can never overwrite the newer run's work; the next run re-derives everything still pending
- ✅ No re-billing across branches - the committed state file means each string is translated once, on whichever branch first introduces it
Manual Workflow Trigger
You can also run translations manually:
- Go to Actions tab in GitHub
- Select Update Translations workflow
- Choose the feature branch to run against (not
main— the workflow commits to the branch it runs on and refuses to targetmain) - (Optional) Specify specific languages:
fr-FR es-ES de-DE - Translations are committed directly to the branch you ran it from
Note: a subset run (specific languages) intentionally does not advance
.translation_state.json— see Change detection. Use it to unblock or backfill one language; run all languages to persist state.
File Structure
scripts/translations/
├── README.md # This file
├── main.py # Entry point for translation script
├── translator.py # Core translation logic
└── requirements.txt # Python dependencies
web/src/locales/languages/
├── en-US.json # Source file (English)
├── ar-SA.json # Arabic translations
├── tr-TR.json # Turkish translations
├── zh-CN.json # Chinese translations
├── fr-FR.json # French translations
├── es-ES.json # Spanish translations
├── de-DE.json # German translations
├── it-IT.json # Italian translations
├── pt-PT.json # Portuguese translations
├── ja-JP.json # Japanese translations
├── ko-KR.json # Korean translations
├── nl-NL.json # Dutch translations
├── zh-TW.json # Traditional Chinese translations
├── ru-RU.json # Russian translations
├── pl-PL.json # Polish translations
└── vi-VN.json # Vietnamese translations
Adding New Languages
- Add the locale code and language name to
LANGUAGE_NAMESintranslator.py(get_supported_languages()is derived from it) - Wire the locale into the web app's locale registry (
web/src/locales/) - Update the README to reflect the new language
- Run the translation script
Troubleshooting
No Run Was Created for My en-US.json Change
Symptom: You changed en-US.json but no Update Translations run appears.
Most likely this is working as intended. Generation no longer fires on push — it
waits until you click Merge when ready or mark a draft ready for review. See
When the run fires. The Verify Translations check will show
you what is pending in the meantime.
If you want the translations now, without merging, trigger it by hand: Actions → Update Translations → Run workflow, selecting your branch.
Otherwise check, in order:
# 1. Does the PR's diff really touch the source file?
git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD | grep en-US.json
# 2. Is the PR from a fork? Fork PRs are skipped — see "Fork PRs" above.
gh pr view --json headRepositoryOwner,isCrossRepository
# 3. What does the workflow think is pending? (free, no API key needed)
cd scripts/translations && python3 main.py --check
If a run exists but produced no commit, the keys were already recorded in
.translation_state.json — nothing was pending, and --check will agree.
My PR Got Ejected From the Merge Queue
Symptom: you clicked Merge when ready, the PR queued, then fell out with "the head branch was updated".
Any push to a queued PR's branch ejects it, and the translation commit is such a push. Clicking Merge when ready is exactly what starts the translation run, so if all your other checks were already green the PR can enter the queue before the translation commit lands, and the commit then knocks it out.
This is self-healing — do nothing. Auto-merge stays enabled through the eject, so once the checks re-run on the translation commit the PR re-queues by itself. You pay one extra queue pass, not a manual re-queue.
To avoid it entirely on a PR you know touches en-US.json, run Actions → Update
Translations on your branch first, then click Merge when ready once the chore(i18n)
commit is on the branch. The generation run is then a no-op.
I Force-Pushed and It Re-Translated Everything
A rebase or amend that drops the translation commit also drops the
.translation_state.json update that came with it. The next run sees those keys as
pending again and pays for them a second time.
Solution: when rebasing, keep the chore(i18n) commit (it is a normal commit —
git rebase preserves it unless you explicitly drop or squash it away). If you did
lose it, nothing breaks; the run simply re-bills those strings.
Two PRs Conflict in the Generated Locale Files
Symptom: two open PRs both changed en-US.json; the second to merge has conflicts
in the 15 locale files and in .translation_state.json.
This is inherent to generating in each PR rather than in one serialised bot PR. Both branches rewrote the same generated files. Generating at merge time rather than on every push makes it much rarer — the two runs have to overlap, instead of both PRs carrying translation commits for their whole review — but it is still possible when two PRs are queued close together.
Solution: do not hand-resolve generated JSON. Take the base branch's copies of the
generated files, keep your own en-US.json, and let the workflow regenerate the rest.
git fetch origin main
git rebase origin/main
When the rebase stops on the conflict (note the inversion: during a rebase --ours is
the branch you are rebasing onto, --theirs is your commit being replayed):
# Generated files: take main's copies.
git checkout --ours -- web/src/locales/languages/ scripts/translations/.translation_state.json
# If en-US.json is also conflicted, keep YOUR English strings instead.
git checkout --theirs -- web/src/locales/languages/en-US.json
git add -- web/src/locales/languages/ scripts/translations/.translation_state.json
git rebase --continue
git push --force-with-lease
The push does not re-fire generation (it only fires on Merge when ready), so click
Merge when ready again — or run the workflow by hand. Either way it re-derives
exactly the keys still pending: both your PR's strings and any the other PR left
undone. python3 main.py --check tells you what that will be before you spend
anything.
The PR Merged Before Its Translations Landed
This should not happen once Verify translations are up to date is a required check
— that is the whole point of it. The queue entry fails and the PR is ejected before it
can merge untranslated.
If it does happen (the check is not required yet, or someone merged with admin
override), the branch is gone by the time the job pushes. The job detects this and
does not recreate the branch as a stray; the run's Summary says so, and the strings
stay pending in .translation_state.json for the next PR that touches en-US.json (or
a manual workflow_dispatch on a fresh branch). Nothing is lost, main is just
briefly English-only for those keys.
API Key Error
DEEPSEEK_API_KEY is not set — cannot reach the translation service.
Solution: Set the DEEPSEEK_API_KEY secret (CI) or environment variable (local).
Import Error
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'openai'
Solution: Run pip3 install -r requirements.txt from scripts/translations
Translation Quality Issues
- Machine translations are not perfect
- Review translations before merging PRs
- Consider manual review for critical UI text
- Native speakers should review translations
- An ambiguous or unstable term belongs in the
TERMStable intranslator.py: itssenseline fixes the meaning for every language at once, and an optional per-locale entry (zh-CNevent→事件) pins one language's rendering. This only affects future translations; an already-translated key is re-sent only when its English source changes (edit the existing translation by hand, or remove the key's hash from.translation_state.jsonto force a re-run)
Build Has Old Translations
Symptom: Build doesn't have the latest translations
Solution: Translations reach main inside the PR that changed en-US.json, so
check that PR:
- Go to Actions → find the Update Translations run for that PR → read its Summary
- Confirm the
chore(i18n): update translations from en-US.jsoncommit is on the branch. If the run finished after the PR merged, the strings missed the train — they will be picked up by the next PR that touchesen-US.json, or by a manualworkflow_dispatchrun on a fresh branch - Builds started before that PR merged will still carry the old strings
Workflow Example
Scenario: Adding New UI Text
-
Developer adds new text to
en-US.json:{ "dashboard": { "newFeature": "This is a new feature" } } -
Push the
en-US.jsonchange and open a PR:git add web/src/locales/languages/en-US.json git commit -m "feat: add new dashboard feature text" git push -u origin feat/new-dashboard-text gh pr create -
Get it reviewed. No translation run yet —
Verify Translationsshows the new keys as pending and stays green. Push as many times as you like; none of it costs API spend or an extra CI cycle. -
Click "Merge when ready". Now the workflow:
- Triggers, because
en-US.jsondiffers from the base branch - Translates only the new or modified keys to all 15 languages
- Pushes
fr-FR.json,es-ES.json, etc. plus.translation_state.jsononto your branch - That one push re-runs your PR's checks; then it queues and merges
- Triggers, because
-
Afterwards:
git pullto pick up the translation commit before your next push- Review the generated strings alongside your own change
Why in the PR, and not on
main? Re-translation across branches is already prevented by the committed state file, not by the trigger: a string is translated once, on whichever branch first introduces it. Generating onmaininstead meant a separatechore/update-translationsPR that nobody was assigned to review, and a window wheremaincarried English strings with no translations.
Change detection (.translation_state.json)
scripts/translations/.translation_state.json records, per locale, a hash of the
English source each translated value was derived from. On every run the script:
- Translates a key only when it is new, missing in a target file, or its English source text changed since the last run (so editing an existing label re-translates it).
- Keeps already-translated text whose source is unchanged — it is never re-sent to the API, and English is never "translated" to English.
- Prunes keys that were removed from
en-US.json. - Bootstraps safely: a key that already has a translation but no recorded hash is adopted as-is (no costly full re-translation, no overwriting manual fixes). This is also what lets a partially-completed run heal: once its locale files merge, those new keys are adopted rather than translated again.
State is only rewritten on a full run (every supported language), because a key's
hash is recorded only when the translation is present in every locale. A subset run
(python3 main.py fr-FR) translates correctly but deliberately leaves state untouched.
Commit .translation_state.json together with the translation files — it is the
source of truth that keeps subsequent runs incremental.
Best Practices
- Review Commits: Check auto-generated translation commits for accuracy
- Test in UI: Verify translations display correctly in the application
- Manual Fixes: Manual edits to a key are preserved until its English source changes
- Context Matters: Some terms may need manual translation for proper context
- Pull before you push: the workflow commits to your branch, so
git pullafter a translation run to avoid a rejected push - Check before you merge:
python3 main.py --checkcosts nothing and tells you exactly what the merge-queue gate will see
Cost Considerations
Translation is billed per token by DeepSeek. The whole en-US.json is ~10,700
strings; a full 15-language rebuild is a one-time cost, and day-to-day runs only
translate the handful of new/changed keys in a given PR.
Cost Optimization:
- ✅ Only new or modified keys are translated (unchanged text is never re-sent)
- ✅ Strings are sent in batches (
TRANSLATION_BATCH_SIZE, default 50) to cut request overhead - ✅ Runs only when a PR changes
en-US.json; the committed state file stops the same string being re-translated on another branch or after a rebase - ✅ Runs once per PR, at merge time — not once per push. Iterating on English
strings during review costs nothing, and the PR pays for one translation run and one
extra CI cycle no matter how many times you edit
en-US.json - ✅ The merge-queue gate is free: pure file comparison, no API calls, no API key,
no
pip install - ✅ Batches run concurrently (
TRANSLATION_CONCURRENCY, default 4) so a run finishes well within a normal PR review cycle - ✅ Failed strings are retried inside the same run, and each retry re-derives what is pending, so only the strings that actually failed are re-sent
- ⚠️ A superseded run is cancelled before it commits, so its spend is lost and the surviving run re-translates those keys. That is the deliberate trade: letting a cancelled run commit would race the newer run and regress locale files, which costs more to untangle than the tokens do. Rare now that generation fires once per PR.
- ✅ Partial progress from a run that finished with failures is still committed — work already paid for is never discarded
Alternative Translation Services
To use a different backend, modify translate_batch() in translator.py. It uses
the OpenAI-compatible chat-completions API, so any provider exposing that interface
(OpenAI, DeepSeek, or a self-hosted model) drops in by changing DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL
and DEEPSEEK_MODEL.
Support
For issues or questions:
- Check this README first
- Review existing GitHub issues
- Create a new issue with the
translationslabel