From 7a72fc0a1ff662471a38fdfda0cf8844bf3ceb0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brennan Benson <79079362+brennanb2025@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 01:29:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] docs(agent-launch): stop the receipt-wording comment claiming
 a migration

The decision was never moved out of orchestration-worker-start-mode; this PR
adds a second copy beside it. Say so, and name the unenforced agreement.
---
 ...stration-worker-start-receipt-wording.test.ts | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/main/runtime/rpc/methods/orchestration-worker-start-receipt-wording.test.ts b/src/main/runtime/rpc/methods/orchestration-worker-start-receipt-wording.test.ts
index 9ead671775f..b52263ba791 100644
--- a/src/main/runtime/rpc/methods/orchestration-worker-start-receipt-wording.test.ts
+++ b/src/main/runtime/rpc/methods/orchestration-worker-start-receipt-wording.test.ts
@@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
 /**
  * The exact sentences `orchestration.workerStart` puts in its mode receipt.
  *
- * These were unpinned when the decision moved to `main/agent-launch/agent-launch-mode`: the
- * existing suites assert `toContain` fragments ('terminal agent', 'cannot create'), and the CLI
- * suite asserts a receipt handed to it by a mock rather than one this code produced. Every one of
- * them stayed green against a deliberately corrupted vocabulary, so nothing was actually holding
- * the wording. A dispatch receipt is the only place a structured→terminal downgrade explains
- * itself, so the whole sentence is the contract, not a fragment of it.
+ * These were never pinned: the existing suites assert `toContain` fragments ('terminal agent',
+ * 'cannot create'), and the CLI suite asserts a receipt handed to it by a mock rather than one
+ * this code produced. Every one of them stayed green against a deliberately corrupted vocabulary,
+ * so nothing was actually holding the wording. A dispatch receipt is the only place a
+ * structured→terminal downgrade explains itself, so the whole sentence is the contract, not a
+ * fragment of it.
+ *
+ * This pins orchestration's own module, which this PR leaves in place. The neutral
+ * `agent-launch/agent-launch-mode` it introduces is a second copy of the same policy; nothing yet
+ * enforces that the two agree.
  */
 
 import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'