mirror of
https://github.com/stablyai/orca.git
synced 2026-10-06 08:02:28 +00:00
stack-foundation
1
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
434365d2de |
Offer to reconnect native chats that were working when Orca restarted (#21096)
* feat(native-chat): resume structured chats that were working at restart
Teardown records a marker for every session this host was genuinely running a
turn for, derived from the LIVE runtime rather than a persisted status row, so
a stale `running` row left by an older crash can never trigger a resume. On the
next launch a modal lists exactly which chats would resume and resumes them via
native continuation (Claude resume/resumeSessionAt, Codex thread id) — never by
re-sending the prompt, which is what makes an agent redo finished work.
A session resumes only when all of these hold: a teardown marker exists and has
not expired, the record's lease is released and reconciled, a provider resume
cursor exists and still matches the marker, the journal's own turn record names
the same turn, and the marker has not already been spent. Markers are consumed
before the resume is submitted, so a crash mid-resume cannot double-fire, and an
admission gate refuses a second concurrent resume for one session. Resumes are
staggered three at a time rather than spawning every provider at once.
The modal's "Don't ask again" checkbox writes the nativeChatResumeWorkOnRestart
setting, which Settings can turn back off; automatic mode runs the identical
predicate and staggering and reports what it did. Declining consumes the markers
so the prompt cannot return every launch — nothing is lost, because opening a
chat still re-acquires it at the same cursor.
* fix(native-chat): compare handle ROOT and turn state when offering a resume
Four defects QA found in the restart-resume offer, fixed together because the
first two interact: shipping the root fix without the state fix would convert a
silent no-op into actively offering finished chats.
1. Claude was never offered (0/4). The marker recorded agentSessionProviderHandleKey,
which embeds Claude's leaf uuid — a branch cursor. The adapter's own close path
appends a `resumed` link with an advanced leaf during the SAME teardown, so the
marker went stale seconds after it was written and the drift guard refused every
Claude session forever. Record and compare agentSessionProviderHandleRoot instead:
the root is the part a resume must preserve, and changing it is a fork, which is
exactly what this guard is for. Codex is unaffected (its thread id is the whole
key) but uses the root too, so the rule is uniform.
2. The predicate compared turn IDENTITY but discarded turn STATE, so a `completed`
turn satisfied it as readily as an interrupted one. Eviction rewrites `running`
to `interrupted` and never to `completed`, so the state is what separates work
that was cut off from work that finished. Require `interrupted` or `unverifiable`.
3. A chat blocked on a pending approval or question was marked as working, because
the teardown reader accepted any `running` turn while the product's own projection
calls that state `attention`. Teardown now defers to that projection: an agent
waiting on the USER is not interrupted work.
4. "Resume all" could silently no-op. The modal fetched candidates at mount; by click
time the chat's own pane may have bound and taken the hold, moving the lease to
`live` so the predicate dropped it and the call returned no results, leaving the
dialog open behind a dead button. Re-derive at click time and settle an
already-live session as resumed — it is running, which is what the user asked for.
Test fakes now model the Claude close path that advances the leaf, which is why no
unit test could previously exhibit defect 1. Ablation covers all eleven guards.
* fix(native-chat): gate the already-live settlement on the full resume predicate
Two follow-ups from re-QA, both cases of a rule stated by intent rather than by
discriminator.
1. The already-live path bypassed the predicate. "Resume all" sends no session
ids, so the fallback's target set was every marker, and it was gated only on
the session having a live provider child. A chat the predicate had refused --
a completed turn, say -- whose pane happened to own the lease was therefore
settled as `already_live` and had its marker spent, inflating the "Resumed N"
count with chats that were never eligible. No provider spawned and no tokens
were spent, but a marker the predicate rejected must never be consumed.
The resumable set now takes an explicit `leaseState`. The already-live path
derives a second set with ONLY the released-lease clause relaxed, and settles
a session just when it is in that set. Every other clause still applies.
2. The `attention` rule was one-sided. Teardown refuses to mint a marker for a
chat blocked on the user, but the set predicate had no equivalent, so a marker
arriving by any other route was offered once eviction rewrote its turn to
`interrupted` -- the same asymmetry the completed-turn case had.
Gated on projectStructuredAgentSessionStatus === 'attention'. That projection
tests for a pending approval or question BEFORE it looks at turn state, so it
still reports `attention` after the turn is settled, which makes it the durable
signal and keeps one source of truth with teardown.
Ablation now covers thirteen guards, including one for each of the above.
* fix(native-chat): capture awaits-user on the marker instead of re-deriving it
The awaits-user clause could never fire. It asked the live projection for
`attention`, which needs a prompt whose resolution is still `pending` -- but
teardown CANCELS that prompt a few phases after it writes the marker. By the next
launch the evidence is gone, for precisely the sessions the clause was written
for. QA measured the injection still being offered and then resumed.
This is the same shape as the leaf-drift bug: state read after teardown is not the
state that justified the marker. The discriminator, now applied across the whole
predicate:
- a fact teardown itself destroys or mutates must be CAPTURED on the marker
while it is still true;
- a fact that evolves on its own must be RE-DERIVED at read time, never
snapshotted.
So `awaitsUser` is now recorded at teardown and the predicate reads the recorded
value. Teardown still declines to mint a marker for such a session, so the
recorded flag is the second line rather than the only one.
Audit of every other clause against the same test:
- turn id (captured) -- teardown rewrites turn STATE but never the id. Correct.
- provider handle root (captured) -- the close path appends a resumed link, and
appendAgentSessionProviderHandleLink refuses one that changes the root, so the
root is invariant under exactly the mutation that broke the key. Correct.
- turn state (re-derived) -- DELIBERATE exception, stated here rather than left
implicit: we are not reading the state that justified the marker, we are
reading teardown's receipt that it settled the turn. A turn still `running`
means eviction never finished, and we refuse. Correct, and intentionally so.
- lease reconciled / released / handoff stage (re-derived) -- these answer a
different, launch-time question: may this host take the lease NOW. The
teardown-time value would be meaningless, and `unreconciled` is cleared by
this launch's own reconciliation. Correct.
- adapter support, marker TTL, marker consumption (re-derived) -- all evolve
independently of teardown. Correct.
Only awaitsUser was on the wrong side.
* fix(native-chat): drop the unreachable awaits-user marker flag
The captured flag was dead code. `awaitsUser` could only be true when the
projected status was `attention`, and `attention` hits the `continue` above the
push -- so every marker teardown can ever write carries `false` (QA measured
22 of 22 across two real teardowns). The predicate clause reading it was
unreachable by any production path.
A flag that is structurally always false is worse than no flag: it reads as a
safeguard, so the next person to touch this trusts it. The asymmetry it was
added to close was only ever reachable by fault injection, because teardown is
the sole writer of markers and already refuses attention sessions.
Removing it also drops an upgrade discontinuity: as a required field it made a
marker written by the previous build fail validation and be silently discarded,
costing a resume offer on precisely the upgrade where the user was mid-turn.
Markers predating the providerHandleRoot rename still will not parse, but those
carry a leaf-sensitive key the predicate would refuse anyway, so nothing usable
is lost.
In its place the teardown gate now states that `status !== 'working'` is the
SINGLE gate for awaiting-user sessions, why a predicate-side mirror would be
unreachable, and why it could not even re-derive the fact -- so the reasoning is
inherited rather than rediscovered.
Ablation is back to twelve guards; every other clause is unchanged.
* fix(native-chat): say reconnect, not resume, and show each offer's age
Two changes, both independent of the parked continuation decision.
1. The copy claimed something QA disproved. "Resuming continues each agent where
it left off" is false: reconnection restores the session at the point it
stopped, with full context and without re-sending the prompt, but the
interrupted reply does not continue on its own. The toast's "Resumed N chats"
implied work had restarted.
Audited every user-facing string against the rule that none may claim work
continues or that a reply resumes -- which caught more than the three strings
the fix started from. The title, the row button, "Resume all", "Resuming...",
the not-now hint ("picks it up where it left off"), the checkbox and its hint
("resume on their own"), the list's aria-label and the Settings row all made
the same claim. The user-facing verb is now reconnect throughout; the body and
update variant state outright that the interrupted reply will not continue.
en.json synced, runtime boot catalog regenerated.
If we later decide to send a continuation instruction, this is one commit to
change back. Shipping text we know to be false was the worse option.
2. Rows now show each offer's age. The TTL is 24 hours and a stale offer looked
identical to a fresh one. The marker already carried `recordedAt`, so this is
a render change plus one field on the renderer's candidate type, formatted
with the existing formatUiRelativeTime helper rather than a new one.
The clock is stamped once when the list arrives rather than read during render:
ages then stay stable across re-renders, and the render stays pure, which the
react(purity) rule requires.
Guards, predicate and RPC are untouched; ablation still covers twelve.
* feat(native-chat): show the workspace name on each reconnect row
A row read `codex · folder:8f3a1c22-… · 8 hours ago`. Recognising which chats
would reconnect is the entire point of the list, and at twenty rows a UUID
identifies nothing.
No RPC or host change was needed: the renderer can already resolve this id.
Resolved the way automation dispatch resolves the same id space
(resolveAutomationDispatchWorkspace) -- a folder workspace by its full
`folder:<uuid>` key via getKnownWorktreeById, a git worktree by its bare
`repoId::path` id via allWorktrees. Both return a Worktree, whose displayName is
a required field, and DetectedWorktree extends Worktree so either shape answers.
Falls back to the id when nothing resolves, which is what the row showed before
and also covers the window before the worktree store has hydrated.
The lookup lives in a per-row subcomponent because a hook cannot run inside
`map`, and its selector returns a primitive string so repeated selector runs
cannot churn referential equality.
* feat(native-chat): group the reconnect modal by worktree and add opt-in continuation
Grouping. Rows are now grouped under a worktree heading with the repo glyph and
an agent count, using the sidebar's own collapse mechanics. Only presentational
pieces are reused -- RepoIconGlyph, CompactAgentExpansion, AgentIcon and
formatShortTimeAgo. The sidebar's agent row cannot be: worktree-card-compact-agent-row
imports DashboardAgentRow, the dashboard's own type, so both surfaces render one
live-agent model requiring a pane, tab and status entry. Every chat offered here
is by definition stopped, so supplying that would mean inventing live state.
Two things I had assumed were reusable and were not:
- DashboardHostBadge returns null unless hostKind is ssh or remote. Structured
chat is local-only, so it would always render nothing. The host line is
omitted rather than faked; the badge is the right element to add if and when
structured chat gains remote support.
- No state dot. Every AgentDotState misleads here: idle and unverifiable both
presuppose a live pane, interrupted renders red like an error, done green,
working a spinner. A missing dot beats one saying these agents are running.
One worktree renders flat with no heading -- a name, count and chevron around a
single group says nothing the dialog has not already said.
The age column now uses formatShortTimeAgo for sidebar consistency. It takes
(timestamp, now) and subtracts internally rather than taking a delta, so the call
is (recordedAt, listedAt); passing the old delta would have rendered plausible
nonsense. The clock is still stamped once into state, so ages stay stable and the
render stays pure.
Continuation. A secondary "Reconnect and continue" action sends one message, from
a single shared constant, identical for both providers. Reconnect is unchanged and
still sends nothing. An info popover quotes the literal message read from that
same constant, so what is shown cannot drift from what is sent.
Ablation now covers fourteen guards. Two are new: continuation only follows a
reconnect that actually happened, and -- inversely -- a send injected into the
reconnect path must turn the test red, since "don't ask again" rests on reconnect
never sending.
* feat(native-chat): say terminal sessions kept running, and clear the quality gate
The modal lists stopped chats with no way to tell that CLI agents are fine, and
the true state of the world is counterintuitive: the terminal sessions survived
the restart and the chats did not. One line now says so, next to the heading
where it frames the list rather than as a footnote at the bottom.
Wording follows the app's own vocabulary rather than inventing a term: the
catalog settles on "terminal sessions" (terminalSessionCount, "Terminal sessions
are grouped by workspace", "No terminal sessions yet"), and UpdateCard already
reassures with "Your terminal sessions won't be interrupted during the update" in
the same text-xs text-muted-foreground treatment. "kept running" rather than
"were restored" -- nothing reconnected them, they never stopped, and the line
says nothing about why.
Also clears check:code-quality:changed, which I had not been running -- oxlint
alone covers neither the design-system nor the casting audit, so 18 findings had
accumulated across the branch.
- design system (4): Button spacing hand-rolled as gap-1/px-2 is just size="xs";
PopoverContent and DialogTitle own their typography and spacing, so the
text-xs moved to the popover's own children and the title's icon gap moved to
a plain wrapper.
- casting (14): production code loses its assertions outright via Reflect.get,
the idiom already used in managed-hook-detection-commands and
worktree-name-retirement. The marker validator reads each field through
Reflect.get and now checks recordedAt is a number rather than asserting it;
the store-file parse uses the existing `file` shape instead of a second
assertion; the runner narrows the admission error's owner with typeof.
Test fixtures keep their assertions behind the line-specific SAFETY:
rationale the repo mandates for exactly this case.
One trap worth recording: the audit reports an assertion at the line its
EXPRESSION OPENS, not where `as` appears, so a disable-next-line above the
closing brace of a multi-line literal is inert and silently changes nothing.
Guards unchanged; ablation re-proved 14/14 at this head.
* fix(native-chat): give the reconnect row's provider icon an accessible name
Every row rendered the provider as a bare AgentIcon, whose svg carries no
aria-label, title or alt. With a Claude chat and a Codex chat in one worktree the
two rows were identical to any non-visual consumer, and the dialog offered
several identically-named "Reconnect" buttons with nothing to tell them apart.
A regression from
|