mirror of
https://github.com/stablyai/orca.git
synced 2026-09-27 16:02:35 +00:00
d9bc75752c8a2309049b58c3aa635b22ef8d4a7a
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
69839c253e |
feat(zcode): explain a ZCode build that has no terminal UI (#22730)
* feat(zcode): explain a ZCode build that has no terminal UI ZCode ships one agent runtime behind two front ends. The desktop app bundles it without `@zcode/tui`, because it draws its own window in Electron. Put that bundle on PATH as `zcode` and it answers `--version`, runs `-p` headlessly, and passes `zcode doctor` — so Orca detects it, launches it, and installs hooks against it, all successfully. Only the interactive session fails, leaving a bare Node stack trace in the pane that reads as a broken Orca integration. Watch a freshly launched ZCode pane's first output and replace that with an explanation: Orca's hooks are fine, this `zcode` just cannot open a session, install one that ships the TUI. The rule keys on Node's own module-resolution error rather than on the healthy build's "TUI requires an interactive terminal." message, because ZCode localizes the latter (`TUI 需要交互式终端。` in zh-CN) and matching it would miss every non-English user. Node's error is not translated and names the package. Scoped so it costs a healthy pane nothing: it runs only for a pane Orca launched as `zcode`, and only over the first 8 KiB, because a module-resolution failure happens before the runtime renders anything. Evidence: `src/main/runtime/__fixtures__/zcode-missing-tui.txt`, a recorded PTY capture of the desktop bundle refusing to start, per docs/reference/agent-pty-transcript-capture.md. Reported-by: JWu527 * refactor(zcode): ask the CLI if it can open a session instead of watching for the failure The stream watcher this replaces never fired. Before/after screenshots were identical and instrumentation showed the hook never ran, so the sidecar was both misplaced and racing a failure that lands ~440ms after spawn. Replace it with a direct question, answered once per run and cached. Reading zai-org/ZCode shows why running it is the only way to ask, and why the answer is unambiguous. `--version` and `doctor` are byte-identical in shape between a build that has the terminal UI and one that does not, because the TUI is only ever touched on the `tui` command path. There, `runTuiCommand` calls `loadTuiRuntime()` before anything else, and `runTui` checks for a TTY only after that module is already loaded. So with stdin at EOF: - no TUI -> fails in the loader -> Node's module-resolution error - has TUI -> loads, then declines -> "TUI requires an interactive terminal." The module error is therefore present exactly when the terminal UI is absent. All three shipping shapes land correctly: an npm/node-bundle install resolves `@zcode/tui` as a real package (esbuild marks it external, so it is never inlined), a SEA build always carries it as embedded assets, and the desktop app's bundled runtime carries neither. Verified against both real builds on this machine rather than a mock: the desktop bundle answers `missing-tui`, a CLI built from source answers `interactive`, and a command that does not exist answers `unknown` — the probe fails open so an unrelated spawn failure never accuses a working CLI. * feat(zcode): warn at launch when the installed zcode cannot open a session Wires the capability probe to the one place a ZCode launch is first known: terminal tab creation, which runs before the pane connects, so the explanation reaches the screen alongside the failure rather than after it. - main exposes the cached probe over `preflight:zcodeInteractiveCapability`, beside the other "what can the installed CLIs do" answers - the web preload stub answers `unknown`, because a paired client has no business deciding anything about the host's CLI install - the renderer notice is advisory: a probe that cannot run never blocks a launch Verified in the running app against the real desktop bundle: creating a ZCode workspace now shows "This ZCode build has no terminal UI" next to the stack trace, where before the trace stood alone. |
||
|
|
90801e2deb |
feat(agents): add first-class ZCode harness (#22464)
* feat(agents): add first-class ZCode harness Add ZCode (Z.ai's `zcode` CLI) as a supervised Orca agent: managed lifecycle hooks on local, SSH and Windows hosts; status, question and approval reporting; synthetic status titles; session resume; orchestration worker launch options; and desktop + mobile agent-picker registration. Written against the newly open-sourced `zai-org/ZCode` (agent CLI 0.16.9), not against a remembered screen: - ZCode's hook runner writes a Claude-compatible stdin alias set, so it routes through the existing Claude-compatible vendor path while keeping its own identity in the sidebar. - `PermissionRequest` fires only once the approval card is on screen and racing the user's answer, so it is proof the pane is blocked, not an auto-approval. - ZCode's clarification tool is literally `AskUserQuestion` with Claude's questions/options shape, so Orca's question card renders it unchanged. - ZCode's `hooks.enabled` defaults to false, which is why configured hooks were reported as never firing; the installer sets it. - ZCode renames its own process to `zcode-cli`, so the expected foreground process cannot be the launch command or dispatch refuses the pane. - ZCode emits no OSC title in any state and repaints its ASCII banner forever, so readiness comes from Orca's synthetic hook title and launch drafts wait on the composer box rather than on a quiet render window. Three files crossed their max-lines limit, so each is split along a real seam: command-line entrypoint parsing out of agent process recognition, skill classification out of skill root discovery, and registry coverage out of the remote hook installer tests. Refs #10564 * fix(zcode): drop the session-option catalog and pin the orchestration contract ZCode's CLI exposes no `--model` flag at all, and the session-option launch path refuses to apply any option until a model id is chosen. A catalog therefore could not deliver `--mode` per worker, and would have accepted `--model` only to drop it silently. Take opencode's position instead: no catalog, so `worker-start --model` is refused with a clear message and ZCode launches with the model from its own config. `--mode` stays reachable through agent args, which is also how the yolo default is applied. Add a contract test covering the parts that make ZCode a usable worker: dispatchable foreground process, stdin prompt delivery, the prompt staying out of the launch command, and the composer-gated draft paste. * refactor(zcode): reuse shared helpers and cut the harness down No behaviour change; every ZCode test still passes. - Use installer-utils' own `hookDefinitionHasManagedCommand` instead of re-walking a hook definition by hand, which also drops a local string reader. - Share one `readZCodeEventMap` instead of keeping the same narrowing in both hook-settings and hook-config-json. - Collapse five identical error returns into one `zcodeHookError` builder, and return early from the status branches instead of assigning through `let`. - Split the event-to-status decision out of `normalizeZCodeEvent` into a pure `readZCodeTurn`, so the normalizer reads as decide-then-build and stops computing the tool name for events that never look at it. - Take a script file name in `readManagedZCodeHookEvents` like its siblings, which removes a `Parameters<typeof …>` indirection at the call site. - Drop the unused `ZCodeHookEvent` export and inline a single-use path helper. - Correct a stale comment: ZCode's loader is a strict `JSON.parse`, so the in-place edit preserves key order and indentation, not comments. * fix(zcode): address review — keep unmanaged event keys, correct comment, de-dupe README - `removeZCodeManagedHooks` deleted any event key whose list ended up empty, so an unrelated `"Notification": []` the user wrote was removed as collateral whenever a managed hook elsewhere made the write happen. Only touch an event Orca actually owned something in; covered by a new regression test. - The `isNewTurnEvent` comment claimed UserPromptSubmit was ZCode's only turn boundary while the expression below it also returned true for SessionStart. Say what the code does: SessionStart lands the idle boundary, UserPromptSubmit is the turn boundary (the Codex/Claude shape). - ZCode appeared twice in the README's single agent-badge block; keep the local-icon entry the link checker validates and drop the favicon duplicate. * docs(zcode): call out that the desktop bundle's CLI cannot open a session From live testing on #22464: pointing `zcode` at the desktop app's bundled `glm/zcode.cjs` installs Orca's hooks fine but then fails with `Cannot find package '@zcode/tui'`, so the pane never opens a session. The symptom reads as a broken harness when the CLI simply has no TUI. Say which build to use and how to check before reporting a problem. Reported-by: JWu527 |