mirror of
https://github.com/stablyai/orca.git
synced 2026-09-22 00:02:31 +00:00
* test(bench): count runtime-graph publications from main The build-provided `__orcaBenchmarkInstrumentation` is gone from the tree, so the typing bench could no longer report graph-publication counts at all. The renderer cannot supply them either: `window.api` is frozen by contextBridge, so `runtime.syncWindowGraph` is not wrappable. Count them where they land instead — main's `runtime:syncWindowGraph` invoke handler — behind ORCA_TYPING_BENCH_GRAPH_PROBE=1, and record the result in the bench report. Measured on an 870-worktree fixture: 21 publications over a 50 s metadata-only window versus ~1,205 with recurring OSC title/status traffic. The long-task fields ship unproven: an injected 250 ms renderer busy-wait produced zero entries even though `longtask` is in `supportedEntryTypes`, so their zeros mean "oracle unverified", not "no long task". The self-test knob exists to make that falsifiable, and the file says so; per-publication build time still needs a separate --cpu-profile run. * test(bench): optional CDP CPU throttle around the typing window * test(bench): report the throttle that ran and the long task the self-test caused Two ways the bench could misreport its own conditions. `cpuThrottleRate` was the requested rate, written into every report, but only two of the three scenarios wrapped their typing window in the throttle — a `--cpu-throttle 4` visible-split run claimed a 4x throttle it never applied. Recording the rate per scenario would have made the report honest; it would also have left one scenario silently ignoring the flag, and a fourth scenario would inherit the same omission. So both: every scenario now goes through one `measureTypingWindow` helper, and the value it returns is the rate the throttle actually applied. `writeBenchReport` takes that composite instead of a bare measurement, so a scenario cannot produce a report without saying what it ran under. Unthrottled runs are unchanged — rate 1 still opens no CDP session. `selfTestLongTaskMs` took the *earliest* long task starting before a cutoff captured after the busy-wait. The observer has been live since probe start, so any unrelated long task from fixture setup satisfied it — the field whose whole job is to prove the oracle is live was the easiest one to fake. The busy-wait now reports its own renderer-clock bounds and the matching entry is the one containing their midpoint: main-thread tasks never overlap, so at most one can, and it is the task the busy-wait ran in. That entry is then withheld from `longTasks`, `longestLongTasks`, and `longTasksAroundPublication`, which had been counting the oracle's injected 250 ms as workload. A zero still means "oracle unproven" — it now also means it honestly. * test(bench): stop the graph probe when the typing run throws * test(e2e): drain queued long-task records before the probe disconnects