Files
orca/src
Neil cd99d6693e fix(runtime): give "same publisher" one answer across the epoch fences
Separable from the retraction fix beneath it, and it changes handover-path
behaviour: a superseded generation that republishes under a merged epoch is now
rejected where it was previously accepted. Take it independently or not at all.

`publisher-identity-fences.ts` held two answers to "is this the same publisher".
`noteRetiredValue` treated a `:headless-merge:` epoch as a SUCCESSOR of its base
and retired the base when the merged form became current, while
`sameSessionTabsPublicationLineage` treated the two as ONE publisher. Those are
contradictory, and the retired-value check's exact-string match was the shim
that kept them from ever meeting: a merged frame was a different string, so it
never looked retired no matter what had been retired.

The cost was that the same predecessor was accepted or rejected depending on
which shape it arrived in. A generation a successor had replaced was fenced when
it republished bare and admitted when it republished merged — the fail-open half
of the same disagreement whose fail-closed half was the removal defect, and the
reason that defect reproduced 1 run in 6 rather than every time.

This cannot be fixed in the fence alone. Making the fence lineage-aware while a
merged epoch still retires its base has the generation retire itself: the
rebuild arrives, retires its own base, and the fence then rejects it as a
retired generation. So both sides move together — a lineage sibling advances the
current epoch instead of superseding it, and inherits its generation's
retirement instead of escaping it.

Scoped to the publication-epoch functions. Runtime-id retirement keeps exact
matching, and `local-structured-session-tabs-sync` keeps its own
`hasRetiredValue` call, where a lineage sibling is already excused explicitly
and a retired epoch is deliberately not treated as proof of a dead generation.
2026-09-10 20:09:51 -07:00
..