mirror of
https://github.com/l0ng-ai/tty7.git
synced 2026-09-22 00:02:23 +00:00
l0ng-ai
a7240f394d
The fork row said "Branch Session" on Claude Code and "Fork Session" everywhere else, on the strength of a source comment claiming "Claude Code calls it branching". It does not. `claude --help` documents the flag as `--fork-session`, described as "When resuming, create a new session ID instead of reusing the original"; the only occurrences of "branch" in its help are an unrelated git-branch review option. The claim came from otty's own UI wording, which I mistook for Claude's vocabulary and then wrote into the source as fact — so the comment goes with the special case rather than being left behind as a false statement about someone else's tool. The split was also inconsistent with itself: Grok takes the identical `--fork-session` flag and was already labelled "Fork Session". Every agent that has the capability calls it forking — `codex fork`, `--fork-session` on Claude Code and Grok, `--fork` on OpenCode — so one wording covers all four. `fork_label` keeps returning `Option<&'static str>`: it is still the UI's single capability gate (`None` = no verified fork command, no row offered), and per-agent wording stays expressible should one ever genuinely diverge. Generated commands are untouched — the existing table test still pins `claude --resume <id> --fork-session` and the other three verbatim. Also drops the two doc sentences that promised the per-agent label, and the stale "Branch Session" mentions left in comments; no occurrence survives anywhere in the tree.