l0ng-ai 9e49b6a412 test(cli): walk the nested verbs when checking the reference for flags ...

`the_reference_documents_every_flag_of_the_verbs_it_covers` read one level:
`cli.get_subcommands()`, then that verb's own arguments. Two things followed.

It never descended, so every flag a level down was unchecked — `tab new --cwd`,
`pane ls --all`, `pane split --ratio`, `pane close --orphans`,
`server restart --hard`. And its gate for "is this verb documented" looked only
for ``` `tty7 <name> ```, which the page uses for leaf verbs; a group is headed
``` ## `pane` — panes ```. So `ws`, `tab`, `pane`, `machine` and `server` were
skipped whole, taking their children with them. Fifteen flags were checked
where there are twenty-two.

Both fixed: the walk recurses, and the gate accepts either heading shape. The
reference turns out to be complete — nothing was actually undocumented, which
is worth knowing rather than assuming.

The matching rule was too strict as well, and the extension is what showed it:
requiring a backtick immediately before the dashes reported
`server restart --hard` missing when it has its own table row, written as
``` `server restart --hard` ```. It now looks for the flag anywhere on the
page.

The floor is five named nested flags rather than a count, because a count
drifts with the surface and what has to hold is that the walk went down.
Verified both ways: dropping `--orphans` from the page is reported, and
stopping the recursion is reported by name.

2026-08-23 07:28:52 +08:00

..

src

test(cli): walk the nested verbs when checking the reference for flags

2026-08-23 07:28:52 +08:00

tests

fix(cli): an error quoting a name cannot drive the terminal either

2026-08-16 11:56:54 +08:00

Cargo.toml

fix(cli): submit send enter outside paste bursts (#322)

2026-08-03 16:55:48 +08:00