l0ng-ai df22d9be21 test(e2e): pin the tree and the registry agreeing under a race ...

Twelve `tab new` at once against one workspace, then check that every
tab landed exactly once and that the tree's pane count still matches the
registry's.

Both invariants this leans on are invisible to a single-threaded test.
The store takes `notify_order` before its state lock and holds it across
delivery, so subscribers see mutations in the order they happened; and
each `tab new` spawns its pane before the tree is asked to hold it, so a
refusal in between leaves a pane running that nothing references. That
second one is quiet — it shows up only as these two counts disagreeing,
which is what `pane close --orphans` exists to mop up.

Verified by hand first: twelve racing creates, and a mixed race of
splits, tab creates, renames and closes, both left the counts equal with
no orphans; the same held with a GUI mirroring the changes live, whose
log recorded no resync or divergence. This is that check, kept.

Also measured while here, and sound, so it is not re-run: 180 pane
create/close cycles move the daemon from 10 fds and 5 threads to 13 and
7, and then stay there across two further rounds — one-time overhead,
not a leak.

2026-08-16 07:55:15 +08:00

..

src

docs(cli): ws attach cannot hold what it claims to take

2026-08-16 07:37:53 +08:00

tests

test(e2e): pin the tree and the registry agreeing under a race

2026-08-16 07:55:15 +08:00

Cargo.toml

fix(cli): submit send enter outside paste bursts (#322)

2026-08-03 16:55:48 +08:00