# Windmill

Open-source platform for internal tools, workflows, API integrations, background jobs, and UIs. Rust backend + Svelte 5 frontend.

## Workflow

1. **Understand**: Before coding, explore the codebase (see Code Navigation below). Use `outline` to understand file structure, `body` to read specific symbols, `def`/`callers`/`callees` to trace code, `Grep` to find usages. Read `docs/` for domain context.
2. **Plan**: For non-trivial changes, use plan mode. For large features, break into reviewable stages
3. **Execute**: Follow coding patterns from skills (`rust-backend`, `svelte-frontend`)
4. **Validate**: After every change, run the appropriate checks per `docs/validation.md`

## Documentation

- **Validation**: `docs/validation.md` — what checks to run based on what you changed
- **Enterprise**: `docs/enterprise.md` — EE file conventions and PR workflow
- **Backend patterns**: use the `rust-backend` skill when writing Rust code
- **Frontend patterns**: use the `svelte-frontend` skill when writing Svelte code. Do NOT edit svelte files unless you have read that skill.
- **Frontend UUIDs**: do not call `crypto.randomUUID()` in frontend code. Import `randomUUID` from `$lib/utils/uuid` instead.
- **Code review**: review the current PR or branch against the shared review policy in `REVIEW.md` (severity triage, public-surface checklist, AGENTS.md compliance, test-coverage assessment). The skill at `.agents/skills/local-review/SKILL.md` orchestrates it. All three CLIs auto-discover the same SKILL — Claude reads `.claude/skills/` (symlinked to the canonical `.agents/skills/` file), Codex and Pi read `.agents/skills/` directly. Invoke with `/local-review` in Claude Code, `$local-review` (or `/skills` selector) in Codex, or `pi --skill local-review` / `/skill:local-review` in Pi. For a Codex-driven pass that mirrors the `codex-pr-review` GitHub action against your unpushed work (committed + uncommitted) before you push, use `/local-review-codex` (`.agents/skills/local-review-codex/`) — same `REVIEW.md` policy, `gpt-5.6-sol`, `xhigh` reasoning; requires the `codex` CLI >= 0.144.1.
- **Domain guides**: `.claude/skills/native-trigger/` and `frontend/tutorial-system-guide.mdc`
- **Brand/UI guidelines**: `frontend/brand-guidelines.md`
- **CLI commands**: when adding/modifying/removing a command, subcommand, option, or description in `cli/src/commands/`, run `python system_prompts/generate.py` to refresh `system_prompts/auto-generated/` and `cli/src/guidance/skills.gen.ts`. The CLI docs the agents use to operate `wmill` are derived from the source — stale generated files give agents the wrong flags.

## Dev Environment

- **Backend**: `cargo run` from `backend/` (API at http://localhost:8000)
- **DuckDB local jobs**: before running DuckDB scripts locally, build the FFI shared library with `cd backend/windmill-duckdb-ffi-internal && ./build_dev.sh`. Re-run it after clean builds or when `backend/target/debug/libwindmill_duckdb_ffi_internal.*` is missing. The bundled DuckDB compile (~2min) is cached in a per-user dir shared across worktrees, so a fresh worktree reuses it and the build is near-instant.
- **Data pipelines (DuckLake) from source**: a plain `cargo run` (even `--features quickjs`) advertises a `duckdb` worker tag but **cannot** execute DuckDB scripts and has **no** working S3 proxy (DuckLake writes 404). Build CE DuckLake with `cargo run --features quickjs,duckdb,parquet,private` (add `,python` for Python scripts, `,enterprise,license` for EE) **and** build the FFI (bullet above). See `backend/CLAUDE.md` → "Running data pipelines (DuckLake) from source" for the exact feature sets and the two feature-gate gotchas.
- **Frontend**: `REMOTE=http://localhost:8000 npm run dev` from `frontend/` (port 3000+)
- **DB**: `psql postgres://postgres:changeme@localhost:5432/windmill`
- **Login**: `admin@windmill.dev` / `changeme`
- **Instance settings**: navigate to `/#superadmin-settings`
- **Migrations**: use `cargo sqlx migrate add -r <name>` from `backend/` to create new migrations (never generate timestamps manually)

## Verifying Frontend Changes

After modifying frontend code, drive the running dev server with the **Playwright MCP** to verify the change in a real browser — don't claim a UI change works without exercising it.

Two MCP servers are registered in `.mcp.json`:
- `playwright` — headless Chromium, default for devboxes (no display required)
- `playwright-headed` — windowed Chromium, when a display is available

**One-time setup:** run `npx playwright install chromium` to download the browser binary (Playwright won't fetch it automatically on first use).

Typical flow:
1. Ensure backend (`cargo run`) and frontend (`REMOTE=http://localhost:8000 npm run dev`) are running
2. `mcp__playwright__browser_navigate` to the relevant page (login at `admin@windmill.dev` / `changeme`)
3. `mcp__playwright__browser_snapshot` to inspect the accessibility tree (preferred over screenshots for reading the DOM)
4. `mcp__playwright__browser_click` / `browser_fill_form` / `browser_type` to interact
5. `mcp__playwright__browser_take_screenshot` for visual confirmation
6. `mcp__playwright__browser_console_messages` / `browser_network_requests` to surface errors

**Attach the screenshots to the PR.** For any change under `frontend/`, embed screenshots of the affected UI in the PR body — the `pr` skill requires this and carries the upload recipe.

If you cannot exercise a UI change (no dev server, etc.), say so explicitly rather than claiming success.

## Banned Patterns

### `$bindable(default_value)` on optional props

Using `$bindable(default_value)` on props that can be `undefined` is **banned**. This pattern causes subtle bugs because the default value masks the `undefined` state.

**Bad:**

```svelte
let { my_prop = $bindable(default_value) }: { my_prop?: string } = $props()
```

**Correct alternatives:**

1. **Use `$derived` with nullish coalescing** — handle the potential `undefined` at the usage site:

   ```svelte
   let { my_prop = $bindable() }: { my_prop?: string } = $props()
   let effective_value = $derived(my_prop ?? default_value)
   ```

2. **Create a `useMyPropState()` helper** — encapsulate the undefined-handling logic in a reusable function and call it higher in the component tree, so the child component always receives a defined value.

## Code Navigation

`wm-ts-nav` is an AST-aware code navigator. Use **wm-ts-nav** for structural queries — it skips comments/strings and understands symbol boundaries.

**MUST use `outline` before `Read`** on unfamiliar files — a 500-line file costs ~500 lines of context, while `outline` costs ~20. Then **MUST use `body "X"`** instead of reading a full file to see one function/struct. Use `Read` with offset/limit only when you need surrounding context that `body` doesn't capture.
- `refs "X" --caller` instead of reading files to find which function contains each reference
- `callers "X"` / `callees "X"` for call-graph questions

EE files (`*_ee.rs`, `*_ee.ts`, `*_ee.svelte`) are indexed — you can `outline`, `def`, `body`, `refs` etc. on them just like regular files.

```bash
NAV="sh wm-ts-nav/nav"
# Use --root backend for Rust, --root frontend/src for TS/Svelte
$NAV --root backend outline backend/path/to/file.rs      # file structure
$NAV --root backend def "ServiceName"                     # find definition
$NAV --root backend body "decrypt_oauth_data"             # extract source code
$NAV --root backend search "%" --parent ServiceName       # methods on a type
$NAV --root backend search "Trigger" --kind struct        # find by kind
$NAV --root backend refs "X" --file handler.rs --caller   # scoped refs with caller
$NAV --root backend callers "X"                           # who calls X?
$NAV --root backend callees "X"                           # what does X call?
```

**Limitations** — syntax-level analysis, no type inference. Use **Grep** instead when completeness matters (finding all usages, exhaustiveness checks):
- `refs`/`callers`/`callees` can't follow re-exports, glob imports, or different import paths to the same symbol
- Trait impls, macro-generated symbols (`sqlx::FromRow`), and namespace member access (`ns.X`) are invisible
- `callees` shows all identifiers in a function body, not just actual calls

## Core Principles

- **MUST `outline` before `Read`** on unfamiliar files — then `body` or `Read` with offset/limit for specifics
- Search for existing code to reuse before writing new code
- Follow established patterns in the codebase
- Keep changes focused — don't refactor beyond what's asked
- **Ship only the tests the PR needs.** A committed test must pin behavior a future change could plausibly break, and be the smallest setup that exercises the new logic. While developing, write as many exhaustive tests and do as much manual testing as you need to convince yourself the change works — then remove that scaffolding before marking the PR ready, keeping only the essential regression guard(s). A test that merely re-exercises pre-existing behavior, or needs elaborate fixtures to assert something trivial, is scaffolding: delete it. If nothing meaningful is left to guard, ship no test rather than a ceremonial one.
- **Comments record constraints, not narration.** Write a comment only for what the code can't show: why a non-obvious approach is required, what breaks if it's "simplified" away. State each invariant once, at the place where someone would break it, in ≤4 lines. Don't describe what the next line does, don't repeat the same rationale at multiple sites, and don't address the PR reviewer (justifying a change belongs in the PR description, not the code). Reference nothing ephemeral — no numbered steps from your dev flow, no "the poller / the test does X" scaffolding, no transient state that won't exist for the next reader; keep only the essential, durable rationale. Describe the code as it is, never its drafting history: "we no longer do X", "unchanged behavior", "instead of the previous approach" are meaningless to a reader who never saw the earlier iteration — before finishing, reread your comments as if the current state is the only state that ever existed.
- **Never attribute work to a specific customer, account, or "requested by a customer" in repo-tracked content** (PR descriptions, commit messages, code comments, docs). Describe changes by their technical motivation instead.
