From 7c97e01914ca87ecbdac4845cd8a46dfcacc5889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guilhem Lemouel Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 01:38:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] style: the fork refusal uses the design system's alert The refusal panel was hand-built from a div and two paragraphs with literal colors, copied from the Runs page's own operator refusal. The frontend's rules say to use the design-system component, and `Alert` already draws exactly this. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) --- .../(root)/(logged)/user/(user)/fork_workspace/+page.svelte | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/frontend/src/routes/(root)/(logged)/user/(user)/fork_workspace/+page.svelte b/frontend/src/routes/(root)/(logged)/user/(user)/fork_workspace/+page.svelte index d376ec0520..3be417202c 100644 --- a/frontend/src/routes/(root)/(logged)/user/(user)/fork_workspace/+page.svelte +++ b/frontend/src/routes/(root)/(logged)/user/(user)/fork_workspace/+page.svelte @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ @@ -8,9 +9,8 @@ `operator`). The server still accepts the call — this refuses the page, it does not enforce the rule; see docs/operator-write-rights.md. --> {#if $userStore?.operator} -