mirror of
https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill.git
synced 2026-08-18 16:02:10 +00:00
0dbd9c1231
* perf: eliminate dual-connection DB pool contention across worker, queue, and api Reuse the held transaction (or move pool reads before begin()) instead of checking out a second pool connection while a tx is open, extending the fix from #9789/#7861. Targets the per-worker pool (max 5) hot paths plus several server-pool API handlers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: pass owned pool to get_email_from_permissioned_as in http trigger handler The generified signature takes impl PgExecutor; the http trigger handler passed &db where db is already &DB, yielding &&Pool which does not impl PgExecutor (only surfaced under the full feature set in CI). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: keep RLS-exposed reads on the non-RLS pool and isolate flow-eval reads in a savepoint Addresses review of the dual-connection sweep: - worker_flow: wrap the stop_after_all_iters_if reads in a SAVEPOINT. The caller swallows the error and keeps using tx, so a DB read failure must not leave the outer transaction aborted (it would fail the later commit). Matches the previous pool-read semantics. - Revert reads that were moved onto an RLS (user_db) transaction back to the non-RLS pool, since RLS row-visibility/role context can change results: push_scheduled_job (email/tag/settings lookups; reachable with a user_db tx from api-schedule/api-flows), push_inner native-retry dedicated_worker routing (RLS isolation variants), resources.rs app-namespace folder auto-create (non-admins must not be blocked), and the script archive/delete UPDATEs. Non-RLS db.begin() reuse and move-before-begin are kept. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: failpoint proving the stop_after_all_iters_if savepoint isolates an aborted read Adds a worker-crate failpoints feature and a data-driven hook: when the stop_after_all_iters_if expr is the magic sentinel, the in-evaluation read runs SELECT 1/0 to abort its (savepoint) transaction. The test asserts the flow still completes (iteration marked failed) — which only holds if the savepoint keeps the outer status-update transaction committable. Without the savepoint the abort would poison the outer tx and the job would never complete. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>