Files
windmill/docs/git-sync-gitlab-setup.md
T

7.5 KiB

Git sync with GitLab

GitLab has no equivalent of a GitHub App, so there is nothing to install and no consent screen. What Windmill needs instead is one credential you create in GitLab and paste once. With it, a GitLab repository gets the same managed features an app-backed GitHub repository has: instant pull over a webhook, merge requests opened on deploy, and a diff preview posted onto the merge request.

The credential

Create a project access token on the project you are syncing (Settings → Access tokens). It is a bot identity that outlives the person who created it, which is what you want for a credential the instance uses unattended, and it reaches exactly the one project.

Scope api
Role Developer to push deploy branches; Maintainer to also manage the webhook and open merge requests
Expiry Required. A group service account PAT can be non-expiring on self-managed (see below); an access token cannot

Use a separate token per repository. A group access token works too and reaches every project in the group, which is convenient for a lot of repositories — but Windmill stores the credential per repository, and renewal rewrites the repository it renewed for. Any other repository holding that same token keeps the revoked one and stops syncing until you paste a new token there. Each stranded repository says so on its card, so it is visible rather than silent, but a token per repository avoids it entirely.

api is a superset: it authorizes Git over HTTPS as well, so no separate write_repository is needed to clone and push, and it is also what makes the token renewable. A write_repository-only token can still push, but Windmill cannot inspect or renew it and reports that in the workspace's git sync settings.

The identity Windmill acts as

GitLab issues an access token to a bot user it creates for it — project_<id>_bot_… for a project token, group_<id>_bot_… for a group one — and the bot's display name is the name you gave the token. That name is the byline on everything Windmill does: the author of deploy commits, of the merge requests it opens, and of the preview notes it writes. Name it for what it is, windmill-sync or similar, rather than something only you will recognise.

Each token you create adds another bot member to the project or group. Renewal does not — it keeps the same bot — so a repository accumulates one bot, not one per year.

Renewal goes through GitLab's own self-rotation endpoint. Both kinds of access token are held as their bot user's personal access token, so the token rotates itself and Windmill never needs a credential with rights over the project or group.

Connecting a repository

In the resource form for a git_repository resource, use the GitLab button: paste the instance URL and the token, pick a project from the list, and Windmill stores the whole remote URL, credential included, in a secret variable and points the resource at it ("url": "$var:u/you/gitlab_host_group_project_url"). It refuses to write over a variable already holding a different repository, so a path collision cannot silently repoint an existing resource.

Renewal rewrites whichever of the two holds the URL, so a URL pasted straight into the resource is renewed as well. The variable is still the better place for it: the credential stays out of the resource, and everything else that references the variable keeps working when the token changes. What cannot be renewed is a variable held in an external secret backend, which Windmill can read but does not own the write to; that is reported on the repository.

Expiry and renewal

Windmill reads expires_at from the token itself and shows it on the repository in the workspace's git sync settings. Within three weeks of expiry it rotates the token through GitLab's own POST /personal_access_tokens/self/rotate, writes the replacement back to the variable, and verifies it. Only the token can rotate itself, so a token without api (or self_rotate) is a permanent warning rather than something Windmill can fix.

Rotation is deliberately never retried. GitLab revokes the old token the instant it issues the replacement, and presenting an already-rotated token to /rotate again is treated as reuse: it revokes the whole token family, including the live replacement. So a rotation that succeeded at GitLab but failed to persist is surfaced as an error to act on, not retried.

Non-expiring tokens are possible only for a group service account PAT on self-managed, with require_personal_access_token_expiry turned off in the instance's application settings. A group access token is always rejected without an expires_at.

What each managed feature needs

Feature Needs
Instant pull A project hook Windmill creates, so Maintainer; and a Windmill base URL GitLab can reach
Merge requests on deploy Developer, plus the api scope
Diff preview on a merge request The project hook, plus permission to post merge request notes

Instant pull falls back to checking the tracked branch about every minute when the hook cannot be created or delivered, so nothing silently stops syncing.

Self-managed differences

Webhooks to a private network are blocked by default. GitLab refuses to create a hook pointing at a private or local address until an administrator enables Allow requests to the local network from webhooks and integrations (Admin → Settings → Network → Outbound requests, allow_local_requests_from_web_hooks_and_services). A Windmill instance on the same private network as GitLab needs this; without it, hook creation fails with a "blocked" error and the repository keeps polling.

A relative-URL install is not supported. GitLab can be served under a path prefix (https://example.com/gitlab), and that prefix cannot be told apart from a group of the same name: example.com/a/b/c.git is either group a/b project c, or prefix a with group b project c. Windmill reads it as the nested group, so on a relative-URL install it derives the wrong API base and the managed features stay unavailable. Such a repository still syncs through its token URL, which needs no API base.

Everything else is identical: Windmill talks to <your-gitlab>/api/v4 and needs no inbound access of its own beyond the hook deliveries.

The deploy preview is a note, not a pipeline status

On GitHub the preview is a check run: its own object, advisory unless the repository makes it required. GitLab has no equivalent. Its only comparable primitive is a commit status, and posting one has side effects Windmill will not impose on a project:

  • GitLab files the status as a job inside whatever pipeline already covers that commit, so a failed Windmill status fails the project's own pipeline, and its reviewers see their test suite as failed.
  • allow_failure is ignored on the commit-status endpoint, so the status cannot be made advisory.
  • On a commit with no pipeline it creates an external pipeline instead, which then gates merging under Pipelines must succeed, including while it is still running.

So on GitLab the preview lives entirely in a merge request note that Windmill keeps up to date: it carries the workspace, the status line, the commit, a link to the job, and the full list of changes merging would deploy. A note cannot block a merge or change what the project's own CI reports.

The note is upserted rather than appended, so a merge request accumulates one Windmill comment however many times it is pushed to.