mirror of
https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill.git
synced 2026-09-05 08:02:18 +00:00
Ruben FiszelandClaude Opus 5
fcdcad1810
Round 6's two findings, both regressions this branch introduced: - The decode returned `Continue` on the edge that FILLED the direct-edge budget, so a `scan`-only tail after it decoded to the 4M-row backstop with nowhere to put anything. The read now ends on that edge. - Seam 3 made the pipeline page choose between the dbt graph and the producer one. They share node ids — `// column total <- dbt://wh/analytics/orders.amount` mints the same `(dbt, path, column)` node dbt's own lineage does — so choosing ended a trace at the boundary in both directions. They are merged again, and a ducklake selection asks about the dbt relation its producers name so the chain continues past it. The dbt editor gets the same merge. Also: the component is walked in Rust rather than by a recursive CTE. A CTE has no index, so the recursive term rescanned the doubled edge set once per level — 1243ms against 59ms for the query alone on a 3000-model project, 11.7M rows in the plan. Same answers, same tests; end to end 1.48s to 0.73s there and 1.60s to 0.26s on a 1000-deep chain. The client stops re-asking for a component it already holds, which is most clicks within one project. The four doc sites that described a whole-project answer are rewritten around what it now is, rather than edited where they disagreed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>