- Refuse `// materialize` on a dbt script, the producer half of the rule the
trigger loop already applies to `// on`: the graph ingest republishes that
path's asset rows wholesale, so a declared write is wiped by the deploy that
accepted it while its runs keep stamping the relation.
- `dormant_dbt_subscriptions` now spells the same predicate its singular sibling
does: the producer set has to be non-empty (nothing produces it yet is deploy
order, not a dormant edge) and excludes the subscriber's own path (a script
never wakes itself). Both divergences are pinned by tests.
- The docs no longer claim the dbt deploy log covers a native producer that drops
its `// materialize`; it does not, and nothing else reports that case.
- An integration test over the deploy contract, since only a real deploy proves
the handler feeds `sole_dbt_producer` the canonical key `asset.path` holds —
the spelling that has to agree across the materialize target, the `// on` ref
and the refusal that joins them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ruben FiszelandClaude Opus 5
addcb4c525