fix: before/after order (#1907)

This commit is contained in:
Lei, HUANG
2023-07-07 19:41:21 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent cd5afc8cb7
commit 4cc42e2ba6

View File

@@ -15,56 +15,7 @@ Refactor table engines to address several historical tech debts.
Both `Frontend` and `Datanode` have to deal with multiple regions in a table. This results in code duplication and additional burden to the `Datanode`.
Before:
```mermaid
graph TB
subgraph Frontend["Frontend"]
direction LR
subgraph MyTable
A("region 0, 2 -> Datanode0")
B("region 1, 3 -> Datanode1")
end
end
MyTable --> MetaSrv
MetaSrv --> ETCD
MyTable-->RegionEngine
MyTable-->RegionEngine1
subgraph Datanode0
RegionEngine("region engine")
region0
region2
RegionEngine-->region0
RegionEngine-->region2
end
subgraph Datanode1
RegionEngine1("region engine")
region1
region3
RegionEngine1-->region1
RegionEngine1-->region3
end
RegionManifest0("region manifest 0")
RegionManifest1("region manifest 1")
RegionManifest2("region manifest 2")
RegionManifest3("region manifest 3")
region0-->RegionManifest0
region1-->RegionManifest1
region2-->RegionManifest2
region3-->RegionManifest3
```
`Datanodes` can update the same manifest file for a table as regions are assigned to different nodes in the cluster. We also have to run procedures on `Datanode` to ensure the table manifest is consistent with region manifests. "Table" in a `Datanode` is a subset of the table's regions. The `Datanode` is much closer to `RegionServer` in `HBase` which only deals with regions.
In cluster mode, we store table metadata in etcd and table manifest. The table manifest becomes redundant. We can remove the table manifest if we refactor the table engines to region engines that only care about regions. What's more, we don't need to run those procedures on `Datanode`.
After:
```mermaid
graph TB
@@ -128,6 +79,54 @@ region2-->RegionManifest2
region3-->RegionManifest3
```
`Datanodes` can update the same manifest file for a table as regions are assigned to different nodes in the cluster. We also have to run procedures on `Datanode` to ensure the table manifest is consistent with region manifests. "Table" in a `Datanode` is a subset of the table's regions. The `Datanode` is much closer to `RegionServer` in `HBase` which only deals with regions.
In cluster mode, we store table metadata in etcd and table manifest. The table manifest becomes redundant. We can remove the table manifest if we refactor the table engines to region engines that only care about regions. What's more, we don't need to run those procedures on `Datanode`.
After:
```mermaid
graph TB
subgraph Frontend["Frontend"]
direction LR
subgraph MyTable
A("region 0, 2 -> Datanode0")
B("region 1, 3 -> Datanode1")
end
end
MyTable --> MetaSrv
MetaSrv --> ETCD
MyTable-->RegionEngine
MyTable-->RegionEngine1
subgraph Datanode0
RegionEngine("region engine")
region0
region2
RegionEngine-->region0
RegionEngine-->region2
end
subgraph Datanode1
RegionEngine1("region engine")
region1
region3
RegionEngine1-->region1
RegionEngine1-->region3
end
RegionManifest0("region manifest 0")
RegionManifest1("region manifest 1")
RegionManifest2("region manifest 2")
RegionManifest3("region manifest 3")
region0-->RegionManifest0
region1-->RegionManifest1
region2-->RegionManifest2
region3-->RegionManifest3
```
This RFC proposes to refactor table engines into region engines as a first step to make the `Datanode` acts like a `RegionServer`.