dennis zhuang 0f625a7e92 fix(promql): correct counter reset accumulation in rate windows (#9089)
* fix(promql): correct counter reset accumulation in rate windows

`prom_rate` and `prom_increase` reused the previous window's counter-reset
correction when the next window slid forward by exactly one sample, adding
the entering reset and subtracting the leaving one. Running a sum through
addition and subtraction does not restore the earlier terms in f64: a large
reset absorbs the smaller ones that must survive it, and an expired infinity
leaves a NaN that no later window can clear. `prom_delta` shares the code but
is not a counter function, so it never took that path.

Index the reset positions of the value array once instead, and reduce each
window over the resets it contains, in sample order. The result is
bit-identical to scanning the window directly, so windows keep the direct
reduction when they request fewer sample pairs than the input has.

Also sweep the query step in the rate benchmarks: the cost of the reset
correction depends on how much the windows overlap, which no existing case
varied.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhuang <xzhuang@greptime.com>

* test(promql): cover counter reset precision over adjacent rate windows

The unit tests build the range windows directly, so they do not show that a
plain PromQL range query produces the window layout that lost the correction.
This case does: with a query step equal to the sample interval, `increase`
over the second window returns 1.333 before the fix and 2.667 after it.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhuang <xzhuang@greptime.com>

* perf(promql): advance the counter reset bounds instead of searching

Locating a window's resets with two binary searches costs more than the
reduction it replaces once a series resets often enough for the searches to
get deep: on a 20k-sample counter resetting every 37 samples, stepping the
windows by one sample was 2.7x slower than the previous code, against 1.2x
for a counter that never resets.

Windows normally advance, so walk the bounds forward from the previous
window and only search when they move back. The cost then no longer depends
on the reset density.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhuang <xzhuang@greptime.com>

* perf(promql): cut the per-window cost of the counter reset index

Two costs the index added showed up on a one-sample query step, where the
removed fast path used to answer each window with two comparisons.

Cache the two reset positions that bound the active slice. A window that only
advanced and reached neither of them covers the same resets as the previous
one, so the common case is four integer comparisons and no lookup at all.

Stop summing the requested sample pairs once they exceed one pass over the
values. The sum only decides which side of that comparison the input falls on,
and a query with a short lookback and a long step settles it after a few
windows instead of after every key.

Together these take the one-sample step from 25-32% slower than the previous
code down to 6-11%, measured as before / after / before to bound drift. No
other step value regresses, and a ten-sample step stays about 88% faster.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhuang <xzhuang@greptime.com>

* fix(promql): accumulate counter resets into the running result

`prom_rate` and `prom_increase` summed a window's counter-reset corrections
on their own and added that sum to `last - first`. Prometheus folds each
reset into the running result instead, and so did this code before #7880.
The two are not interchangeable in f64: over samples `[1e16, 1, 0, 1]` the
isolated sum rounds `1e16 + 1.0` back to `1e16`, which then cancels against
the first sample and reports no increase at all, where folding the resets in
one at a time keeps the 1.0.

Restore the original order. The reset index accumulates into the result the
same way, so it still matches a direct scan of the window bit for bit, but a
window's contribution can no longer be cached as a standalone value and is
re-added from its own difference each time. The bounds are still cached, so
a window that did not cross a reset skips the lookup, and one that holds no
resets returns without touching the index at all.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhuang <xzhuang@greptime.com>

* test(promql): note which reset boundaries the stride of one walks

Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhuang <xzhuang@greptime.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhuang <xzhuang@greptime.com>
2026-09-10 07:11:39 +00:00
2023-08-10 08:08:37 +00:00
2023-06-25 11:05:46 +08:00
2023-11-09 10:38:12 +00:00
2023-03-28 19:14:29 +08:00

GreptimeDB Logo

Metrics, logs, and traces.
One engine, on your infrastructure.

A columnar database for metrics, logs, and traces on object storage. Apache-2.0 licensed core.

User Guide | API Docs | Roadmap 2026

Stable Canary Nightly

stable for production  ·  canary includes pre-releases  ·  nightly is a weekly snapshot of main

Docker Pulls GitHub Actions Codecov License
Slack Twitter LinkedIn

Introduction

GreptimeDB is an open-source observability database. Metrics, logs, and traces run on one columnar engine over object storage and share one table model: tags, timestamp, and fields. When signals carry common identifiers such as service, host, or trace ID, you can correlate them in SQL without moving data between databases.

Ingest through OpenTelemetry, Prometheus Remote Write, Loki Push, or Elasticsearch Bulk. Use SQL across observability data and PromQL for metrics. Migrate ingestion one signal at a time without rebuilding your collectors.

Why You Might Use It

  • You run Prometheus plus Loki or Elasticsearch and want one backend instead of three
  • You have outgrown Prometheus on cardinality or retention and don't want the Thanos/Mimir operational surface
  • You need long retention on object storage without a separate analytics stack
  • You want to query telemetry with SQL, not only a domain query language
  • You are storing GenAI or agent telemetry (OTel GenAI conventions) alongside infrastructure signals
  • You need the same engine and semantics on resource-constrained devices

Learn more in Why GreptimeDB.

Overview

A quick overview of what GreptimeDB ingests, how it connects to other systems, and what its distributed engine lets you do.

GreptimeDB Overview

What's Supported

Ingest OpenTelemetry (OTLP), Prometheus Remote Write, Loki Push, Elasticsearch Bulk, InfluxDB line protocol, gRPC
Query SQL, PromQL, Jaeger-compatible trace queries, MySQL and PostgreSQL wire protocols
Storage S3, GCS, Azure Blob and S3-compatible endpoints as primary storage, with memory and local-disk caches
Built in Retention policies, downsampling, continuous aggregation, explicit table partitioning, and inverted / skipping / fulltext indexes

Compute and storage are disaggregated: object storage holds the data, while memory and local-disk caches keep recent and frequently queried data close to compute.

Compatibility and Migration

Compatibility is per protocol, and query-side coverage is narrower than ingestion.

Compatible Not compatible
Prometheus Remote Write ingestion; PromQL queries Gaps are listed in PromQL compatibility
Loki Push ingestion; dual-write through Grafana Alloy makes the cutover gradual LogQL and the rest of the Loki query API
Elasticsearch _bulk ingestion in the open-source core; QueryDSL partially, in Enterprise Most other Elasticsearch APIs

Benchmarks:

Limitations and Edition Boundary

Cluster deployment, object storage, the Flow engine, and every ingestion protocol listed above are in the Apache-2.0 build. Repartitioning, region migration, and index creation are manual operations there.

Read replicas, workload isolation, and automated repartitioning are GreptimeDB Enterprise features, along with enterprise security and governance. The Enterprise overview has the current list, and pricing has the edition comparison.

Architecture

GreptimeDB can run in two modes:

  • Standalone — single binary for development and small deployments.
  • Distributed — four components, each independently scalable:
    • Frontend — protocol entry (OTel, Prometheus, MySQL/PostgreSQL, gRPC, ingestion APIs for Elasticsearch/InfluxDB/Loki) and the distributed query engine. Stateless, scales horizontally.
    • Datanode — region engine with WAL, memtable, SST, cache, compaction, and indexes. Persists data to object storage. Elastic.
    • Metasrv — metadata, routing, repartitioning, and security. Backed by a pluggable KV layer (etcd or RDS).
    • Flownode (optional) — continuous flow computation (streaming and materialized views).

For deeper coverage, see the architecture doc or DeepWiki.

GreptimeDB System Overview

Try GreptimeDB

For AI agents — paste this prompt into your agent:

Read https://docs.greptime.com/SKILL.md and follow the instructions
to deploy, configure, ingest, and query GreptimeDB.
docker run -p 127.0.0.1:4000-4003:4000-4003 \
  -v "$(pwd)/greptimedb_data:/greptimedb_data" \
  --name greptime --rm \
  greptime/greptimedb:latest standalone start \
  --http-addr 0.0.0.0:4000 \
  --grpc-bind-addr 0.0.0.0:4001 \
  --mysql-addr 0.0.0.0:4002 \
  --postgres-addr 0.0.0.0:4003

Dashboard: http://localhost:4000/dashboard

Read more in the full Install Guide.

Troubleshooting:

  • Cannot connect to the database? Ensure that ports 4000, 4001, 4002, and 4003 are not blocked by a firewall or used by other services.
  • Failed to start? Check the container logs with docker logs greptime for further details.

Getting Started

Build From Source

Prerequisites:

  • Rust toolchain — nightly, pinned by rust-toolchain.toml
  • Protobuf compiler (>= 3.15)
  • C/C++ building essentials: gcc / g++ / autoconf and the glibc dev package (libc6-dev on Ubuntu, glibc-devel on Fedora)
  • Python toolchain (optional, only for some test scripts)

Build and run:

make                          # build greptime binary
cargo run -- standalone start # start in standalone mode

Common dev commands:

make fmt            # format Rust code
make clippy         # lint (fails on warnings)
make test           # unit + integration tests (uses cargo-nextest)
make sqlness-test   # SQL regression tests

See the Contribution Guidelines for the full developer workflow.

Tools & Extensions

Project Status

GreptimeDB is generally available, with stable APIs and regular releases. It runs in production at scale — OceanBase Cloud operates 80+ GreptimeDB clusters managing 300 TB of logs, cutting log storage cost by 60%+ after migrating from Grafana Loki. See more in case studies.

Read the v1.0 highlights and 2026 roadmap, or browse the version reference.

If GreptimeDB is useful to you, please star the repo.

Known Users

Community

We invite you to engage and contribute!

License

GreptimeDB is an open-core project. Its core is licensed under the Apache License 2.0.

A small set of peripheral, enterprise-only features are gated behind the enterprise Cargo feature (not built by default) and are governed by the separate GreptimeDB Enterprise License. Source files under that license carry an explicit Enterprise License header.

Commercial Support

Scaling observability on your infrastructure? GreptimeDB Enterprise adds the operational, security, and support layer for production deployments. Contact us for details.

Contributing

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to all contributors! See AUTHOR.md.


All trademarks, logos, and brand names referenced in this README and in the Overview diagram are the property of their respective owners. Their use is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement or affiliation.

S
Description
Open-source, cloud-native, unified observability database for metrics, logs and traces, supporting SQL/PromQL/Streaming.
Readme Apache-2.0
1.1 GiB
Languages
Rust 98.4%
Python 0.8%
Shell 0.4%
JavaScript 0.2%