Files
leptos-shadcn-ui/docs/remediation/03-file-size-remediation.md
Peter Hanssens c3759fb019 feat: Complete Phase 2 Infrastructure Implementation
🏗️ MAJOR MILESTONE: Phase 2 Infrastructure Complete

This commit delivers a comprehensive, production-ready infrastructure system
for leptos-shadcn-ui with full automation, testing, and monitoring capabilities.

## 🎯 Infrastructure Components Delivered

### 1. WASM Browser Testing 
- Cross-browser WASM compatibility testing (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Mobile)
- Performance monitoring with initialization time, memory usage, interaction latency
- Memory leak detection and pressure testing
- Automated error handling and recovery
- Bundle analysis and optimization recommendations
- Comprehensive reporting (HTML, JSON, Markdown)

### 2. E2E Test Integration 
- Enhanced Playwright configuration with CI/CD integration
- Multi-browser testing with automated execution
- Performance regression testing and monitoring
- Comprehensive reporting with artifact management
- Environment detection (CI vs local)
- GitHub Actions workflow with notifications

### 3. Performance Benchmarking 
- Automated regression testing with baseline comparison
- Real-time performance monitoring with configurable intervals
- Multi-channel alerting (console, file, webhook, email)
- Performance trend analysis and prediction
- CLI benchmarking tools and automated monitoring
- Baseline management and optimization recommendations

### 4. Accessibility Automation 
- WCAG compliance testing (A, AA, AAA levels)
- Comprehensive accessibility audit automation
- Screen reader support and keyboard navigation testing
- Color contrast and focus management validation
- Custom accessibility rules and violation detection
- Component-specific accessibility testing

## 🚀 Key Features

- **Production Ready**: All systems ready for immediate production use
- **CI/CD Integration**: Complete GitHub Actions workflow
- **Automated Monitoring**: Real-time performance and accessibility monitoring
- **Cross-Browser Support**: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Mobile Chrome, Mobile Safari
- **Comprehensive Reporting**: Multiple output formats with detailed analytics
- **Error Recovery**: Graceful failure handling and recovery mechanisms

## 📁 Files Added/Modified

### New Infrastructure Files
- tests/e2e/wasm-browser-testing.spec.ts
- tests/e2e/wasm-performance-monitor.ts
- tests/e2e/wasm-test-config.ts
- tests/e2e/e2e-test-runner.ts
- tests/e2e/accessibility-automation.ts
- tests/e2e/accessibility-enhanced.spec.ts
- performance-audit/src/regression_testing.rs
- performance-audit/src/automated_monitoring.rs
- performance-audit/src/bin/performance-benchmark.rs
- scripts/run-wasm-tests.sh
- scripts/run-performance-benchmarks.sh
- scripts/run-accessibility-audit.sh
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml
- playwright.config.ts

### Enhanced Configuration
- Enhanced Makefile with comprehensive infrastructure commands
- Enhanced global setup and teardown for E2E tests
- Performance audit system integration

### Documentation
- docs/infrastructure/PHASE2_INFRASTRUCTURE_GUIDE.md
- docs/infrastructure/INFRASTRUCTURE_SETUP_GUIDE.md
- docs/infrastructure/PHASE2_COMPLETION_SUMMARY.md
- docs/testing/WASM_TESTING_GUIDE.md

## 🎯 Usage

### Quick Start
```bash
# Run all infrastructure tests
make test

# Run WASM browser tests
make test-wasm

# Run E2E tests
make test-e2e-enhanced

# Run performance benchmarks
make benchmark

# Run accessibility audit
make accessibility-audit
```

### Advanced Usage
```bash
# Run tests on specific browsers
make test-wasm-browsers BROWSERS=chromium,firefox

# Run with specific WCAG level
make accessibility-audit-wcag LEVEL=AAA

# Run performance regression tests
make regression-test

# Start automated monitoring
make performance-monitor
```

## 📊 Performance Metrics

- **WASM Initialization**: <5s (Chrome) to <10s (Mobile Safari)
- **First Paint**: <3s (Chrome) to <5s (Mobile Safari)
- **Interaction Latency**: <100ms average
- **Memory Usage**: <50% increase during operations
- **WCAG Compliance**: AA level with AAA support

## 🎉 Impact

This infrastructure provides:
- **Reliable Component Development**: Comprehensive testing and validation
- **Performance Excellence**: Automated performance monitoring and optimization
- **Accessibility Compliance**: WCAG compliance validation and reporting
- **Production Deployment**: CI/CD integration with automated testing

## 🚀 Next Steps

Ready for Phase 3: Component Completion
- Complete remaining 41 components using established patterns
- Leverage infrastructure for comprehensive testing
- Ensure production-ready quality across all components

**Status**:  PHASE 2 COMPLETE - READY FOR PRODUCTION

Closes: Phase 2 Infrastructure Implementation
Related: #infrastructure #testing #automation #ci-cd
2025-09-20 12:31:11 +10:00

5.9 KiB

File Size Remediation Plan

Issue Summary

Severity: 🟡 HIGH
Effort: 20-30 hours
Priority: P1 (Blocks testing and LLM comprehension)

Problem Description

Multiple files exceed 300-line limit, impacting:

  • Test granularity and isolation
  • LLM context understanding
  • Code review efficiency
  • Maintainability and debugging

Files Exceeding Limit:

  • select/src/implementation_tests.rs - 891 lines
  • button/src/tests.rs - 844 lines
  • switch/src/implementation_tests.rs - 760 lines
  • table/src/data_table.rs - 689 lines
  • Plus 15 more files 500+ lines

Root Cause Analysis

  1. Monolithic Test Files: All tests crammed into single files
  2. God Objects: Complex components not properly decomposed
  3. Copy-Paste Inflation: Repeated test patterns instead of helpers
  4. Missing Abstractions: No shared test utilities

Remediation Strategy

Phase 1: Test File Decomposition (12-16 hours)

Break down by test category:

button/src/tests.rs (844 lines) →
├── tests/
│   ├── rendering_tests.rs      (~150 lines)
│   ├── interaction_tests.rs    (~150 lines) 
│   ├── accessibility_tests.rs  (~150 lines)
│   ├── variant_tests.rs        (~150 lines)
│   ├── edge_case_tests.rs      (~150 lines)
│   └── integration_tests.rs    (~100 lines)
└── test_utils.rs               (~50 lines)

Example Decomposition:

// button/src/tests/rendering_tests.rs
use super::super::*;
use crate::test_utils::*;

#[cfg(test)]
mod rendering {
    use super::*;
    
    #[wasm_bindgen_test]
    fn renders_default_button() {
        let result = render_component(|| {
            view! { <Button>"Test"</Button> }
        });
        
        assert_button_has_class(&result, "bg-primary");
        assert_button_text(&result, "Test");
    }
    
    // More focused rendering tests...
}

Phase 2: Component Decomposition (8-12 hours)

Break down large components:

table/src/data_table.rs (689 lines) →
├── components/
│   ├── table_header.rs         (~100 lines)
│   ├── table_row.rs           (~100 lines)
│   ├── table_cell.rs          (~80 lines)
│   ├── table_pagination.rs    (~120 lines)
│   └── table_sorting.rs       (~100 lines)
├── hooks/
│   ├── use_table_state.rs     (~80 lines)
│   └── use_sorting.rs         (~60 lines)
└── lib.rs                     (~60 lines - exports only)

Phase 3: Shared Test Utilities (4-6 hours)

Create common test infrastructure:

// packages/test-utils/src/component_testing.rs
pub fn render_component<F, V>(component: F) -> ComponentTestResult 
where
    F: Fn() -> V + 'static,
    V: IntoView,
{
    // Standard component mounting and testing setup
}

pub fn assert_button_has_class(result: &ComponentTestResult, class: &str) {
    // Reusable assertion logic
}

pub fn assert_accessibility_compliance(result: &ComponentTestResult) {
    // Shared a11y testing
}

Implementation Plan

Week 1: Critical Test Files

Day 1-2: button/src/tests.rs → 6 focused test files Day 3-4: select/src/implementation_tests.rs → category-based split Day 5: switch/src/implementation_tests.rs → interaction focus

Week 2: Component Architecture

Day 1-2: table/src/data_table.rs → component decomposition Day 3-4: Remaining large implementation files Day 5: Shared utilities and cleanup

File Size Rules Going Forward

// Add to rustfmt.toml or clippy config
max_lines = 300

// Add to CI checks
- name: Check File Sizes
  run: |
    large_files=$(find packages/leptos -name "*.rs" -type f -exec wc -l {} + | awk '$1 > 300 {print $2 " has " $1 " lines"}')
    if [ -n "$large_files" ]; then
      echo "Files exceeding 300 line limit:"
      echo "$large_files"
      exit 1
    fi

Specific File Remediation

select/implementation_tests.rs (891 lines)

Split into:

  • select_rendering_tests.rs (150 lines)
  • select_option_tests.rs (150 lines)
  • select_keyboard_tests.rs (150 lines)
  • select_accessibility_tests.rs (150 lines)
  • select_performance_tests.rs (100 lines)
  • select_integration_tests.rs (150 lines)

button/tests.rs (844 lines)

Split into:

  • button_variants_tests.rs (200 lines)
  • button_interactions_tests.rs (200 lines)
  • button_accessibility_tests.rs (200 lines)
  • button_edge_cases_tests.rs (200 lines)

table/data_table.rs (689 lines)

Architecture refactor:

  • Extract sorting logic → table_sorting.rs
  • Extract pagination → table_pagination.rs
  • Extract row rendering → table_row_renderer.rs
  • Core table logic → max 200 lines

Success Criteria

  • No files exceed 300 lines
  • Test files split by logical categories
  • Shared test utilities reduce duplication
  • CI enforces line limits going forward
  • Component architecture follows single responsibility
  • Documentation updated for new structure

Benefits

  1. Better Test Isolation: Easier to run specific test categories
  2. Improved LLM Context: Each file fits in model context windows
  3. Faster Code Reviews: Reviewers can focus on specific areas
  4. Better Test Parallelization: Categories can run independently
  5. Easier Debugging: Smaller surface area per file

Risk Mitigation

  • Risk: Breaking existing imports during refactor

  • Mitigation: Use pub use re-exports to maintain compatibility

  • Risk: Test discovery issues after split

  • Mitigation: Update Cargo.toml test configurations

  • Risk: Increased compilation time from more files

  • Mitigation: Profile build times, optimize if needed

Dependencies

  • Working knowledge of Rust module system
  • Test infrastructure already in place
  • CI pipeline for enforcement

Owner

Primary: Senior Rust Engineer familiar with component architecture
Secondary: Test Engineer for test splitting validation Reviewer: Staff Engineer for architectural approval