mirror of
https://github.com/cloud-shuttle/leptos-shadcn-ui.git
synced 2026-05-21 14:00:41 +00:00
0988aed57e
- Complete documentation reorganization into professional structure - Achieved 90%+ test coverage across all components - Created sophisticated WASM demo matching shadcn/ui quality - Fixed all compilation warnings and missing binary files - Optimized dependencies across all packages - Professional code standards and performance optimizations - Cross-browser compatibility with Playwright testing - New York variants implementation - Advanced signal management for Leptos 0.8.8+ - Enhanced testing infrastructure with TDD approach
73 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
73 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
# Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
|
|
|
|
This directory contains the Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for our data engineering consultancy. These documents capture important architectural decisions, their context, and consequences.
|
|
|
|
## ADR Index
|
|
|
|
| ADR | Title | Status | Date |
|
|
|-----|-------|--------|------|
|
|
| [ADR-001](./001-tdd-first-approach.md) | Test-Driven Development (TDD) First Approach | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
| [ADR-002](./002-testing-pyramid-strategy.md) | Testing Pyramid Strategy | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
| [ADR-003](./003-playwright-testing-demos.md) | Playwright Testing for Demos and Applications | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
| [ADR-004](./004-api-contracts-and-testing.md) | API Contracts and Testing Strategy | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
| [ADR-005](./005-pnpm-package-management.md) | PNPM Package Management Strategy | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
| [ADR-006](./006-leptos-versioning-strategy.md) | Leptos Versioning and Latest Support Strategy | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
| [ADR-007](./007-rust-coding-standards.md) | Rust Coding Standards and Latest Practices | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
| [ADR-008](./008-competitive-analysis-strategy.md) | Competitive Analysis and Capability Matching Strategy | ACCEPTED | 2024-09-08 |
|
|
|
|
## ADR Template
|
|
|
|
When creating new ADRs, use the following template:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# ADR-XXX: [Title]
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
**PROPOSED** / **ACCEPTED** / **DEPRECATED** / **SUPERSEDED** - YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
[Describe the context and problem statement]
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
[State the architectural decision]
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
### Positive
|
|
[Describe the positive consequences]
|
|
|
|
### Negative
|
|
[Describe the negative consequences]
|
|
|
|
### Mitigation
|
|
[Describe how negative consequences will be mitigated]
|
|
|
|
## Implementation
|
|
[Describe the implementation details]
|
|
|
|
## Review and Updates
|
|
[Describe the review process and update triggers]
|
|
|
|
## Related ADRs
|
|
[List related ADRs]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## ADR Process
|
|
|
|
1. **Proposal**: Create ADR with PROPOSED status
|
|
2. **Review**: Team review and discussion
|
|
3. **Decision**: Accept, reject, or modify
|
|
4. **Implementation**: Implement the decision
|
|
5. **Review**: Regular review and updates
|
|
|
|
## ADR Maintenance
|
|
|
|
- **Regular Reviews**: ADRs are reviewed quarterly
|
|
- **Updates**: ADRs are updated when decisions change
|
|
- **Deprecation**: ADRs are deprecated when superseded
|
|
- **Archival**: Deprecated ADRs are archived but not deleted
|
|
|
|
## Contact
|
|
|
|
For questions about ADRs, contact the architecture team at architecture@dataengineeringpro.com.
|