mirror of
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon.git
synced 2026-07-13 17:10:39 +00:00
review doc comment
This commit is contained in:
@@ -46,19 +46,21 @@
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The `HandleInner` is allocated as a `Arc<Mutex<HandleInner>>` and
|
||||
//! referenced weakly and strongly from various places which we are now illustrating.
|
||||
//! For bevity, we will omit the `Arc<Mutex<>>` part in the following.
|
||||
//! For brevity, we will omit the `Arc<Mutex<>>` part in the following and instead
|
||||
//! use `strong ref` and `weak ref` when referring to the `Arc<Mutex<HandleInner>>`
|
||||
//! or `Weak<Mutex<HandleInner>>`, respectively.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! - The `Handle` is a strong ref.
|
||||
//! - The `WeakHandle` is a weak ref.
|
||||
//! - The only long-lived strong reference is stored in the `PerTimelineState`.
|
||||
//! - The `Cache` stores a weak ref.
|
||||
//! - The `PerTimelineState` contains a `HashMap<CacheId, strong ref>`.
|
||||
//! - The `Cache` is a `HashMap<unique identifier for the shard, weak ref>`.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Lifetimes:
|
||||
//! - `WeakHandle` and `Handle`: single pagestream request.
|
||||
//! - `Cache`: single page service connection.
|
||||
//! - `PerTimelineState`: lifetime of the Timeline object (i.e., i.e., till `Timeline::shutdown`).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Request Handling Flow
|
||||
//! ## Request Handling Flow (= filling and using the `Cache``)
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! To dispatch a request, the page service connection calls `Cache::get`.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
@@ -86,7 +88,7 @@
|
||||
//! > method invocation.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Why do we want to avoid that?
|
||||
//! Because the gate is a shared location in memory and entering it invovles
|
||||
//! Because the gate is a shared location in memory and entering it involves
|
||||
//! bumping refcounts, which leads to cache contention if done frequently
|
||||
//! from multiple cores in parallel.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
@@ -94,17 +96,19 @@
|
||||
//! That `Arc` is private to the `HandleInner` and hence to the connection.
|
||||
//! (Review the "Data Structures" section if that is unclear to you.)
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! A `WeakHandle` is a weak ref to the HandleInner.
|
||||
//! When upgrading a `WeakHandle`, we acquire a strong ref to the `Arc<GateGuard>`.
|
||||
//! A `WeakHandle` is a weak ref to the `HandleInner`.
|
||||
//! When upgrading a `WeakHandle`, we upgrade to a strong ref to the `HandleInner` and
|
||||
//! further acquire an additional strong ref to the `Arc<GateGuard>` inside it.
|
||||
//! Again, this manipulation of ref counts is is cheap because `Arc` is private to the connection.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! When downgrading a `Handle` to a `WeakHandle`, we drop the `Arc<GateGuard>`.
|
||||
//! Again, this is cheap because the `Arc` is private to the connection.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! In addition to the GateGuard, we need to provide `impl Deref for Handle` and `impl Deref for WeakHandle`.
|
||||
//! In addition to the GateGuard, we need to provide `Deref<Target=Timeline>` impls
|
||||
//! for `Handle` or `WeakHandle`.
|
||||
//! For this, both `Handle` and `WeakHandle` need access to the `Arc<Timeline>`.
|
||||
//! Upgrading a `WeakHandle` does not consume the `Handle`, so we can't move the `Arc<Timeline>` out of
|
||||
//! `Handle` into `WeakHandle`.
|
||||
//! Upgrading a `WeakHandle` does not consume the `Handle`, so we can't move the
|
||||
//! `Arc<Timeline>` out of `Handle` into `WeakHandle`.
|
||||
//! We could clone the `Arc<Timeline>` when upgrading a `WeakHandle`, but that would cause contention
|
||||
//! on the shared memory location that trakcs the refcount of the `Arc<Timeline>`.
|
||||
//! Instead, we wrap the `Arc<Timeline>` into another `Arc`.
|
||||
@@ -125,7 +129,8 @@
|
||||
//! ```
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The former cycle is a memory leak if not broken.
|
||||
//! The latter cycle further prevent the Timeline from shutting down.
|
||||
//! The latter cycle further prevents the Timeline from shutting down
|
||||
//! because we certainly won't drop the Timeline while the GateGuard is alive.
|
||||
//! Preventing shutdown is the whole point of this handle/cache system,
|
||||
//! but when the Timeline needs to shut down, we need to break the cycle.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
@@ -137,19 +142,17 @@
|
||||
//! [`HandleInner::ShutDown`], which drops the only long-lived strong ref to the
|
||||
//! `Arc<GateGuard>`.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! `PerTimelineState::shutdown` drops all the `HandleInners` it contains,
|
||||
//! thereby breaking the cycle.
|
||||
//! It also initiates draining of already existing `Handle`s, by
|
||||
//! poisoning things so that no new `HandleInner`'s can be tracked
|
||||
//! in the shut down `PerTimelineState`.
|
||||
//! It also initiates draining of already existing `Handle`s by
|
||||
//! poisoning things so that no new `HandleInner`'s can be added
|
||||
//! to the `PerTimelineState`, which will make subsequent `Cache::get` fail.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Concurrently existing / already upgraded `Handle`s will extend the
|
||||
//! existence of the cycle.
|
||||
//! lifetime of the `Arc<Mutex<HandleInner>>` and hence cycles.
|
||||
//! However, since `Handle`s are short-lived and new `Handle`s are not
|
||||
//! handed out after either `PerTimelineState::shutdown` or `Cache` drop,
|
||||
//! that extension of the cycle is bounded.
|
||||
//! handed out from `Cache::get` or `WeakHandle::upgrade` after
|
||||
//! `PerTimelineState::shutdown`, that extension of the cycle is bounded.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Concurrently existing `WeakHandle`s will fail to `upgrade()`:
|
||||
//! while they will succeed in upgradingtheir weak arc ref to a strong ref,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user