## Problem
This test has been flaky for a long time.
As far as I can tell, the test was simply wrong to expect postgres
activity to result in deterministic sizes: making the match fuzzy is not
a hack, it's just matching the reality that postgres doesn't promise to
write exactly the same number of pages every time it runs a given query.
## Summary of changes
Equalities now tolerate up to 4 pages different. This is big enough to
tolerate the deltas we've seen in practice.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/2962
It is usually not intended to notify a random member of the compute team
for pageserver PRs.
Leaving the notification of the storage team in place, because this
serves a purpose when some external contributor opens a PR and isn't
sure who to ask.
## Problem
Because `neon_local` by default runs with no remote storage, it was not
running the deletion queue workers, and the attempt to call into
`recover()` was failing.
This is a bogus configuration that will go away when we make remote
storage mandatory.
## Summary of changes
Don't try and do deletion queue recovery when remote storage is
disabled.
The reason we don't just unset `control_plane_api` to avoid this is that
generations will soon become mandatory, irrespective of when we make
remote storage mandatory.
This effectively reverts #3832.
There's a couple issues we just discovered with the free space monitor,
and to my knowledge, the fact we're putting the file cache on a separate
filesystem (even when on disk) that's guaranteed to have more room than
the maximum size means that this free space monitor should have no
effect.
More details:
1. The control plane sets the maximum file cache size based on max CU
2. The control plane sets the size of the filesystem underlying the file
cache based on the maximum user selectable CU (or, if the endpoint is
larger, then that size), so that there's always enough room
3. If postmaster gets SIGKILL'd, then the free space monitor process
does not exit
4. If the free space monitor is acting on the cache file but not subject
to locking or up-to-date metadata from a newer postgres instance, then
this could lead to data corruption.
So, in practice I belive the risk of data corruption is *low* but not
nothing, and given the issues we hit because of (3), and given that this
the free space monitor shouldn't be necessary because of (1) and (2),
it's best to just remove it outright.
See also: neondatabase/autoscaling#534, #5405
## Problem
We need to count metrics always when a connection is open. Not only when
the transfer is 0.
We also need to count bytes usage for HTTP.
## Summary of changes
New structure for usage metrics. A `DashMap<Ids, Arc<Counters>>`.
If the arc has 1 owner (the map) then I can conclude that no connections
are open.
If the counters has "open_connections" non zero, then I can conclude a
new connection was opened in the last interval and should be reported
on.
Also, keep count of how many bytes processed for HTTP and report it
here.
Part of #5172. Builds upon #5243, #5298. Includes the test changes:
- no more RemoteStorageKind.NOOP
- no more testing of pageserver without remote storage
- benchmarks now use LOCAL_FS as well
Support for running without RemoteStorage is still kept but in practice,
there are no tests and should not be any tests.
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
## Problem
Currently we don't have a way to migrate tenants from one pageserver to
another without a risk of gap in availability.
## Summary of changes
This follows on from https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4919
Migrating tenants between pageservers is essential to operating a
service
at scale, in several contexts:
1. Responding to a pageserver node failure by migrating tenants to other
pageservers
2. Balancing load and capacity across pageservers, for example when a
user expands their
database and they need to migrate to a pageserver with more capacity.
3. Restarting pageservers for upgrades and maintenance
Currently, a tenant may migrated by attaching to a new node,
re-configuring endpoints to use the new node, and then later detaching
from the old node. This is safe once [generation
numbers](025-generation-numbers.md) are implemented, but does meet
our seamless/fast/efficient goals:
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
## Problem
Over the past couple days, we've had a couple VMs hit issues with
postgres getting hit by memory.high throttling, even after #5303 was
supposed to fix that. The tl;dr of those issues is that because
vm-monitor startup sets the file cache size first, before interacting
with the cgroup, cgroup throttling can mean we timeout connecting to the
file cache and never reset the cgroup, even if memory has been upscaled
since then.
See e.g.:
- https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C03F5SM1N02/p1695218132208249
- https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C03F5SM1N02/p1695314613696659
## Summary of changes
This PR adds an additional step into vm-monitor startup, where we first
set the cgroup's memory.high value to 'max', removing the capacity for
throttling. This preferable to just setting memory.high before the file
cache, because it's theoretically possible that the new value of
memory.high could still be less than the current memory usage, in which
case postgres could continue to be throttled without sufficient memory
events to relieve that.
Implementing this properly involved adding a method to our internal
cgroup interface, and it seemed like there was duplicated functionality
there, so this PR unifies that as well, making things a bit more
consistent.
## Problem
Control plane API calls in prod will need authentication.
## Summary of changes
`control_plane_api_token` config is loaded and set as HTTP
`Authorization` header.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5139
When you log more than a few blocks, you need to reserve the space in
advance. We didn't do that, so we got errors. Now we do that, and
shouldn't get errors.
Fixes#3978. `test_partial_evict_tenant` can fail multiple times so even
though we retry it as flaky, it will still haunt us.
Originally was going to just relax the comparison, then ended up
replacing warming up to use full table scans instead of `pgbench
--select-only`. This seems to help by producing the expected layer
accesses. There might be something off with how many layers pg16
produces compared to pg14 and pg15. Created #5392.
## Problem
Pageservers must not delete objects or advertise updates to
remote_consistent_lsn without checking that they hold the latest
generation for the tenant in question (see [the RFC](
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/blob/main/docs/rfcs/025-generation-numbers.md))
In this PR:
- A new "deletion queue" subsystem is introduced, through which
deletions flow
- `RemoteTimelineClient` is modified to send deletions through the
deletion queue:
- For GC & compaction, deletions flow through the full generation
verifying process
- For timeline deletions, deletions take a fast path that bypasses
generation verification
- The `last_uploaded_consistent_lsn` value in `UploadQueue` is replaced
with a mechanism that maintains a "projected" lsn (equivalent to the
previous property), and a "visible" LSN (which is the one that we may
share with safekeepers).
- Until `control_plane_api` is set, all deletions skip generation
validation
- Tests are introduced for the new functionality in
`test_pageserver_generations.py`
Once this lands, if a pageserver is configured with the
`control_plane_api` configuration added in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5163, it becomes safe to
attach a tenant to multiple pageservers concurrently.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
Fixes#5072. See proof from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5072#issuecomment-1735580798.
Turns out multiple threads can get the same nanoseconds since epoch, so
switch to using millis (for finding the prefix later on) and randomness
via `thread_rng` (protect against adversial ci runners).
Also changes the "per test looking alike" prefix to more "general"
prefix.
The TaskKind dimension added in #5339 is insufficient to understand what
kind of data causes the cache hits.
Regarding performance considerations: I'm not too worried because we're
moving from 3 to 4 one-byte sized fields; likely the space now used by
the new field was padding before. Didn't check this, though, and it
doesn't matter, we need the data.
What I don't like about this PR is that we have an `Unknown` content
type, and I also don't like that there's no compile-time way to assert
that it's set to something != `Unknown` when calling the page cache.
But, this is what I could come up with before tomorrow’s release, and I
think it covers the hot paths.
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C033RQ5SPDH/p1694595347598249
## Summary of changes
Update last written LSN after walloging all createdb stuff
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Should have added them in the initial PR #5186.
Would have been nice to test the failure cases as well, but, without
mocking the FS, that's too hard / platform-dependent.
This PR adds a `task_kind` label to page cache access metrics.
These are to validate our hypothesis that the high hit page cache rate
we observe in prod is due to internal tasks, not getpage requests from
compute.
We believe the latter should near-always be a pageserver-page-cache
_miss_ because compute has it's own page cache, and hence there is no
locality of reference for its accesses to pageserver page cache.
Before this PR, we didn't have `RequestContext` propagation to any code
below the on-demand downloader.
The vast majority of changes in this PR is concerned with adding that
propagation.
## Problem
Compute start time has improved, but the timing of connection retries
from the proxy is rather slow, meaning we could be making clients wait
hundreds of milliseconds longer than necessary.
## Summary of changes
Previously, retry time in ms was `100 * 1.5**n`, and `n` starts at 1,
giving: 150, 225, 337, 506, 759, 1139, 1709, ...
This PR changes that to `25 * sqrt(2)**(n - 1)` instead, giving: 25, 35,
50, 71, 100, 141, 200, ...
## Problem
Do not allow new installation of deprecated `hnsw` extension.
The same approach as in https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5345
## Summary of changes
- Remove `trusted = true` from `hnsw.control`
- Remove `hnsw` related targets from Makefile
## Problem
Before releasing new version to production, we'd like to run a set of
required checks on the incoming release.
The simplest approach, which doesn't require many changes — dedicate one
staging region to `preprod` installation.
The proposed changes to the release flow are the following:
- When a release PR is merged into the release branch — trigger
deployment from the release branch to a dedicated staging-preprod region
(for now, it's going to be `eu-west-1` — Ireland)
Corresponding infrastructure PR:
https://github.com/neondatabase/aws/pull/585
## Summary of changes
- Trigger `deploy.dev` workflow with `-f deployPreprodRegion=true` for
release branch
## Problem
In 83e7e5dbbd dependencies were only
updated for Mac users. Without libicu, postgres 16 build fails.
## Summary of changes
Update dependencies on Ubuntu and fedora to include libicu.
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C05L7D1JAUS/p1693775881474019
## Summary of changes
Do not perform local file cache resizing in processes having no PGPROC
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Split off from #5297. Builds upon #5326. Handles original review
comments which I did not move to earlier split PRs. Completes test
support for verifying events by notifying of the last batch of events.
Adds cleaning up of tempfiles left because of an unlucky shutdown or
SIGKILL.
Finally closes#5175.
Co-authored-by: Arpad Müller <arpad-m@users.noreply.github.com>
Only notable change is including neondatabase/autoscaling#523, which we
hope will help with making sure that TCP connections are properly
terminated before shutdown (which hopefully fixes a leak in the
pageserver).
## Problem
We didn't have a Postgres 16 snapshot of data to run compatibility tests
on, but now we have it (since the release).
## Summary of changes
- remove `@skip_on_postgres(PgVersion.V16, ...)` from compatibility
tests
this should allow test
test_delete_tenant_exercise_crash_safety_failpoints with
debug-pg16-Check.RETRY_WITH_RESTART-mock_s3-tenant-delete-before-remove-timelines-dir-True
to pass more reliably.
The test is still flaky, perhaps more after #5233, see #3831.
Do one more `timeline_checkpoint` *after* shutting down safekeepers
*before* shutting down pageserver. Put more effort into not compacting
or creating image layers.
With the addition of the "stateful event verification" the
test_consumption_metrics.py is now too crowded. Split it up for
pageserver and proxy.
Split from #5297.
Write collected metrics to disk to recover previously sent metrics on
restart.
Recover the previously collected metrics during startup, send them over
at right time
- send cached synthetic size before actual is calculated
- when `last_record_lsn` rolls back on startup
- stay at last sent `written_size` metric
- send `written_size_delta_bytes` metric as 0
Add test support: stateful verification of events in python tests.
Fixes: #5206
Cc: #5175 (loggings, will be enhanced in follow-up)
Split off from #5297.
There should be no functional changes here:
- refactor tenant metric "production" like previously timeline, allows
unit testing, though not interesting enough yet to test
- introduce type aliases for tuples
- extra refactoring for `collect`, was initially thinking it was useful
but will do a inline later
- shorter binding names
- support for future allocation reuse quests with IdempotencyKey
- move code out of tokio::select to make it rustfmt-able
- generification, allow later replacement of `&'static str` with enum
- add tests that assert sent event contents exactly
## Problem
VM should be updated if XLH_LOCK_ALL_FROZEN_CLEARED flags is set in
XLOG_HEAP_LOCK,XLOG_HEAP_2_LOCK_UPDATED WAL records
## Summary of changes
Add handling of this records in walingest.rs
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
It was utterly broken on v15 before commit 83e7e5dbbd, which fixed the
incorrect definition of XLOG_DBASE_CREATE_WAL_LOG. We never noticed
because we had no tests for it.
## Problem
In many places in test code, paths are built manually from what
NeonEnv.tenant_dir and NeonEnv.timeline_dir could do.
## Summary of changes
1. NeonEnv.tenant_dir and NeonEnv.timeline_dir moved under class
NeonPageserver as the path they use is per-pageserver instance.
2. Used these everywhere to replace manual path building
Closes#5258
---------
Signed-off-by: Rahul Modpur <rmodpur2@gmail.com>
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C05L7D1JAUS/p1694614585955029https://www.notion.so/neondatabase/Duplicate-key-issue-651627ce843c45188fbdcb2d30fd2178
## Summary of changes
Swap old/new block references
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
