## Problem
We don't carry run-* labels from external contributors' PRs to
ci-run/pr-* PRs. This is not really convenient.
Need to sync labels in approved-for-ci-run workflow.
## Summary of changes
Added the procedure of transition of labels from the original PR
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
We use ubuntu-latest as a default OS for running jobs. It can cause
problems due to instability, so we should use the LTS version of Ubuntu.
## Summary of changes
The image ubuntu-latest was changed with ubuntu-22.04 in workflows.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
## Problem
We want to regularly verify the performance of pgvector HNSW parallel
index builds and parallel similarity search using HNSW indexes.
The first release that considerably improved the index-build parallelism
was pgvector 0.7.0 and we want to make sure that we do not regress by
our neon compute VM settings (swap, memory over commit, pg conf etc.)
## Summary of changes
Prepare a Neon project with 1 million openAI vector embeddings (vector
size 1536).
Run HNSW indexing operations in the regression test for the various
distance metrics.
Run similarity queries using pgbench with 100 concurrent clients.
I have also added the relevant metrics to the grafana dashboards pgbench
and olape
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
A title for automatic proxy release PRs is `Proxy release`, and for
storage & compute, it's just `Release`
## Summary of changes
- Amend PR title for Storage & Compute releases to "Storage & Compute
release"
## Problem
We don't build our docker images for ARM arch, and that makes it harder
to run images on ARM (on MacBooks with Apple Silicon, for example).
## Summary of changes
- Build `neondatabase/neon` for ARM and create a multi-arch image
- Build `neondatabase/compute-node-vXX` for ARM and create a multi-arch
image
- Run `test-images` job on ARM as well
## Problem
Currently, `latest` tag is added to the images in several cases:
```
github.ref_name == 'main' || github.ref_name == 'release' || github.ref_name == 'release-proxy'
```
This leads to a race; the `latest` tag jumps back and forth depending on
the branch that has built images.
## Summary of changes
- Do not push `latest` images to prod ECR (we don't use it)
- Use `docker buildx imagetools` instead of `crane` for tagging images
- Unify `vm-compute-node-image` job with others and use dockerhub as a
first source for images (sync images with ECR)
- Tag images with `latest` only for commits in `main`
## Problem
`report-benchmarks-failures` got skipped if a dependent job fails.
## Summary of changes
- Fix the if-condition by adding `&& failures()` to it; it'll make the
job run if the dependent job fails.
## Problem
There are not enough arm runners and jobs in `neon-extra-builds` workflow
take about the same amount of time on a small-arm runner as on
large-arm.
## Summary of changes
- Switch `neon-extra-builds` workflow from `large-arm64` to
`small-arm64` runners
## Problem
`report-benchmarks-failures` job is triggered for any failure in the CI
pipeline, but we need it to be triggered only for failed `benchmarks`
job
## Summary of changes
- replace `failure()` with `needs.benchmarks.result == 'failure'` in the
condition
## Problem
`benchmarks` job that we run on the main doesn't block anything, so it's
easy to miss its failure.
Ref https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/13087
## Summary of changes
- Add `report-benchmarks-failures` job that report failures of
`benchmarks` job to a Slack channel
While switching to use nextest with the repository in f28bdb6, we had
not noticed that it doesn't yet support running doctests. Run the doc
tests before other tests.
## Problem
Move from aws based arm64 runners to bare-metal based
## Summary of changes
Changes in GitHub action workflows where `runs-on: arm64` used. More
parallelism added, build time for `neon with extra platform builds`
workflow reduced from 45m to 25m
## Problem
Ref https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C036U0GRMRB/p1688122168477729
## Summary of changes
- Add sha from postgres repo into postgres version string (via
`--with-extra-version`)
- Add a test that Postgres version matches the expected one
- Remove build-time hard check and allow only related tests to fail
## Problem
Benchmarks don't use the vectored read path.
## Summary of changes
* Update the benchmarks to use the vectored read path for both singular
and vectored gets.
* Disable validation for the benchmarks
## Problem
We are currently supporting two read paths. No bueno.
## Summary of changes
High level: use vectored read path to serve get page requests - gated by
`get_impl` config
Low level:
1. Add ps config, `get_impl` to specify which read path to use when
serving get page requests
2. Fix base cached image handling for the vectored read path. This was
subtly broken: previously we
would not mark keys that went past their cached lsn as complete. This is
a self standing change which
could be its own PR, but I've included it here because writing separate
tests for it is tricky.
3. Fork get page to use either the legacy or vectored implementation
4. Validate the use of vectored read path when serving get page requests
against the legacy implementation.
Controlled by `validate_vectored_get` ps config.
5. Use the vectored read path to serve get page requests in tests (with
validation).
## Note
Since the vectored read path does not go through the page cache to read
buffers, this change also amounts to a removal of the buffer page cache. Materialized page cache
is still used.
- Cleanup part for `docker/setup-buildx-action` started to fail with the following error (for no obvious reason):
```
/nvme/actions-runner/_work/_actions/docker/setup-buildx-action/v3/webpack:/docker-setup-buildx/node_modules/@actions/cache/lib/cache.js:175
throw new Error(`Path Validation Error: Path(s) specified in the action for caching do(es) not exist, hence no cache is being saved.`);
^
Error: Path Validation Error: Path(s) specified in the action for caching do(es) not exist, hence no cache is being saved.
at Object.rejected (/nvme/actions-runner/_work/_actions/docker/setup-buildx-action/v3/webpack:/docker-setup-buildx/node_modules/@actions/cache/lib/cache.js:175:1)
at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
at fulfilled (/nvme/actions-runner/_work/_actions/docker/setup-buildx-action/v3/webpack:/docker-setup-buildx/node_modules/@actions/cache/lib/cache.js:29:1)
```
- Downgrade `docker/setup-buildx-action` from v3 to v2
## Problem
For PRs, by default, we check out a phantom merge commit (merge a branch
into the main), but using a real branches head when finding `build-tools`
image tag.
## Summary of changes
- Change `COMMIT_SHA` to use `${{ github.sha }}` instead of `${{
github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}` for PRs
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
## Problem
`build-build-tools-image` workflow is designed to be run only in one
example per the whole repository. Currently, the job gets cancelled if a
newer one is scheduled, here's an example:
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/8419610607
## Summary of changes
- Explicitly set `cancel-in-progress: false` for all jobs that aren't
supposed to be cancelled
## Problem
During Nightly Benchmarks, we want to collect pgbench results for
sharded tenants as well.
## Summary of changes
- Add pre-created sharded project for pgbench
## Problem
Proxy release to a preprod automatically triggers a deployment of storage
controller (`deployStorageController=true` by default)
## Summary of changes
- Set `deployStorageController=false` for proxy releases to preprod
- Set explicitly `deployStorageController=true` for storage releases to
preprod and prod
## Problem
We don't want to run an excessive e2e test suite on neonvm if there are
no relevant changes.
## Summary of changes
- Check PR diff and if there are no relevant compute changes (in
`vendor/`, `pgxn/`, `libs/vm_monitor` or `Dockerfile.compute-node`
- Switch job from `small` to `ubuntu-latest` runner to make it possible
to use GitHub CLI
## Problem
We want to deploy releases to a preprod region first to perform required
checks
## Summary of changes
- Deploy `release-XXX` / `release-proxy-YYY` docker tags to a preprod region
These test runs usually take 20-30 minutes. if something hangs, we see
actions proceeding for several hours: it's more convenient to have them
time out sooner so that we notice that something has hung faster.
All of production is using it now as of
https://github.com/neondatabase/aws/pull/1121
The change in `flaky_tests.py` resets the flakiness detection logic.
The alternative would have been to repeat the choice of io engine in
each test name, which would junk up the various test reports too much.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
The current implementation of `deploy-prod` workflow doesn't allow to
run parallel deploys on Storage and Proxy.
## Summary of changes
- Call `deploy-proxy-prod` workflow that deploys only Proxy components,
and that can be run in parallel with `deploy-prod` for Storage.
## Problem
We build compute-tools binary twice — in `compute-node` and in
`compute-tools` jobs, and we build them slightly differently:
- `cargo build --locked --profile release-line-debug-size-lto`
(previously in `compute-node`)
- `mold -run cargo build -p compute_tools --locked --release`
(previously in `compute-tools`)
Before:
- compute-node: **6m 34s**
- compute-tools (as a separate job): **7m 47s**
After:
- compute-node: **7m 34s**
- compute-tools (as a separate step, within compute-node job): **5s**
## Summary of changes
- Move compute-tools image creation to `Dockerfile.compute-node`
- Delete `Dockerfile.compute-tools`
## Problem
`pin-build-tools-image` job doesn't have access to secrets and thus
fails. Missed in the original PR[0]
- [0] https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6795
## Summary of changes
- pass secrets to `pin-build-tools-image` job
## Problem
Currently, after updating `Dockerfile.build-tools` in a PR, it requires
a manual action to make it `pinned`, i.e., the default for everyone. It
also makes all opened PRs use such images (even created in the PR and
without such changes).
This PR overhauls the way we build and use `build-tools` image (and uses
the image from Docker Hub).
## Summary of changes
- The `neondatabase/build-tools` image gets tagged with the latest
commit sha for the `Dockerfile.build-tools` file
- Each PR calculates the tag for `neondatabase/build-tools`, tries to
pull it, and rebuilds the image with such tag if it doesn't exist.
- Use `neondatabase/build-tools` as a default image
- When running on `main` branch — create a `pinned` tag and push it to
ECR
- Use `concurrency` to ensure we don't build `build-tools` image for the
same commit in parallel from different PRs
## Problem
In the original PR[0], I've missed a couple of `release` occurrences
that should also be handled for `release-proxy` branch
- [0] https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6797
## Summary of changes
- Add handling for `release-proxy` branch to allure report
- Add handling for `release-proxy` branch to e2e tests malts.com
## Problem
To "build" a compute image that doesn't have anything new, kaniko takes
13m[0], docker buildx does it in 5m[1].
Also, kaniko doesn't fully support bash expressions in the Dockerfile
`RUN`, so we have to use different workarounds for this (like `bash -c
...`).
- [0]
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/8011512414/job/21884933687
- [1]
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/8008245697/job/21874278162
## Summary of changes
- Use docker buildx to build `compute-node` images
- Use docker buildx to build `neon-image` image
- Use docker buildx to build `compute-tools` image
- Use docker hub for image cache (instead of ECR)
## Problem
We want to release Proxy at a different cadence.
## Summary of changes
- build-and-test workflow:
- Handle the `release-proxy` branch
- Tag images built on this branch with `release-proxy-XXX` tag
- Trigger deploy workflow with `deployStorage=true` &
`deployStorageBroker=true` on `release` branch
- Trigger deploy workflow with `deployPgSniRouter=true` &
`deployProxy=true` on `release-proxy` branch
- release workflow (scheduled creation of release branch):
- Schedule Proxy releases for Thursdays (a random day to make it
different from Storage releases)
## Problem
For PRs from external contributors, we're still running `actionlint` and
`neon_extra_builds` workflows (which could fail due to lack of
permissions to secrets).
## Summary of changes
- Extract `check-permissions` job to a separate reusable workflow
- Depend all jobs from `actionlint` and `neon_extra_builds` workflows on
`check-permissions`
This PR introduces a new vectored implementation of the read path.
The search is basically a DFS if you squint at it long enough.
LayerFringe tracks the next layers to visit and acts as our stack.
Vertices are tuples of (layer, keyspace, lsn range). Continuously
pop the top of the stack (most recent layer) and do all the reads
for one layer at once.
The search maintains a fringe (`LayerFringe`) which tracks all the
layers that intersect the current keyspace being searched. Continuously
pop the top of the fringe (layer with highest LSN) and get all the data
required from the layer in one go.
Said search is done on one timeline at a time. If data is still required for
some keys, then search the ancestor timeline.
Apart from the high level layer traversal, vectored variants have been
introduced for grabbing data from each layer type. They still suffer from
read amplification issues and that will be addressed in a different PR.
You might notice that in some places we duplicate the code for the
existing read path. All of that code will be removed when we switch
the non-vectored read path to proxy into the vectored read path.
In the meantime, we'll have to contend with the extra cruft for the sake
of testing and gentle releasing.
## Problem
We use a bunch of deprecated actions.
See https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/7958569728
(Annotations section)
```
Node.js 16 actions are deprecated. Please update the following actions to use Node.js 20: actions/checkout@v3, actions/setup-java@v3, actions/cache@v3, actions/github-script@v6. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-09-22-github-actions-transitioning-from-node-16-to-node-20/.
```
## Summary of changes
- `actions/cache@v3` -> `actions/cache@v4`
- `actions/checkout@v3` -> `actions/checkout@v4`
- `actions/github-script@v6` -> `actions/github-script@v7`
- `actions/setup-java@v3` -> `actions/setup-java@v4`
- `actions/upload-artifact@v3` -> `actions/upload-artifact@v4`
## Problem
We have finite amount of runners and intermediate results are often
wanted before a PR is ready for merging. Currently all PRs get e2e tests
run and this creates a lot of throwaway e2e results which may or may not
get to start or complete before a new push.
## Summary of changes
1. Skip e2e test when PR is in draft mode
2. Run e2e when PR status changes from draft to ready for review (change
this to having its trigger in below PR and update results of build and
test)
3. Abstract e2e test in a Separate workflow and call it from the main
workflow for the e2e test
5. Add a label, if that label is present run e2e test in draft
(run-e2e-test-in-draft)
6. Auto add a label(approve to ci) so that all the external contributors
PR , e2e run in draft
7. Document the new label changes and the above behaviour
Draft PR : https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/7729128470
Ready To Review :
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/7733779916
Draft PR with label :
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/7725691012/job/21062432342
and https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/7733854028
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
We use an outdated version of Python (3.9.2)
## Summary of changes
- Update Python to the latest patch version (3.9.18)
- Unify the usage of python caches where possible
## Problem
We've got several issues with the current `benchmarks` job setup:
- `benchmark_durations.json` file (that we generate in runtime to
split tests into several jobs[0]) is not consistent between these
jobs (and very not consistent with the file if we rerun the job). I.e.
test selection for each job can be different, which could end up in
missed tests in a test run.
- `scripts/benchmark_durations` doesn't fetch all tests from the
database (it doesn't expect any extra directories inside
`test_runner/performance`)
- For some reason, currently split into 4 groups ends up with the 4th
group has no tests to run, which fails the job[1]
- [0] https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4683
- [1] https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6629
## Summary of changes
- Generate `benchmark_durations.json` file once before we start
`benchmarks` jobs (this makes it consistent across the jobs) and pass
the file content through the GitHub Actions input (this makes it
consistent for reruns)
- `scripts/benchmark_durations` fix SQL query for getting all required
tests
- Split benchmarks into 5 jobs instead of 4 jobs.
## Problem
We have switched to new test results and new coverage results, so no
need to collect these data in old formats.
## Summary of changes
- Remove "Upload coverage report" for old coverage report
- Remove "Store Allure test stat in the DB" for old test results format
