Cc: #3486
Adds a method to replace a particular layer from the LayerMap for the
purposes of remote layer download and layer eviction. In those use cases
read lock on layer map needs to be released after initial search, but
other operations could modify layermap before replacing thread gets to
run.
Co-authored-by: bojanserafimov <bojan.serafimov7@gmail.com>
refactor: use new type LayerFileName when referring to layer file names in PathBuf/RemotePath
Before this patch, we would sometimes carry around plain file names in
`Path` types and/or awkwardly "rebase" paths to have a unified
representation of the layer file name between local and remote.
This patch introduces a new type `LayerFileName` which replaces the use
of `Path` / `PathBuf` / `RemotePath` in the `storage_sync2` APIs.
Instead of holding a string, it contains the parsed representation of
the image and delta file name.
When we need the file name, e.g., to construct a local path or
remote object key, we construct the name ad-hoc.
`LayerFileName` is also serde {Dese,Se}rializable, and in an initial
version of this patch, it was supposed to be used directly inside
`IndexPart`, replacing `RemotePath`.
However,
commit 3122f3282f
Ignore backup files (ones with .n.old suffix) in download_missing
fixed handling of `*.old` backup file names in IndexPart, and we need
to carry that behavior forward.
The solution is to remove `*.old` backup files names during
deserialization. When we re-serialize the IndexPart, the `*.old` file
will be gone.
This leaks the `.old` file in the remote storage, but makes it safe
to clean it up later.
There is additional churn by a preliminary refactoring that got squashed
into this change:
split off LayerMap's needs from trait Layer into super trait
That refactoring renames `Layer` to `PersistentLayer` and splits off a subset
of the functions into a super-trait called `Layer`.
The upser trait implements just the functions needed by `LayerMap`, whereas
`PersisentLayer` adds the context of the pageserver.
The naming is imperfect as some functions that reside in `PersistentLayer`
have nothing persistence-specific to it. But it's a step in the right direction.
