## Problem
Previously, we were using `observe_closure_duration` in `VirtualFile`
file opening code, but this doesn't support async open operations, which
we want to use as part of #4743.
## Summary of changes
* Move the duration measurement from the `with_file` macro into a
`observe_duration` macro.
* Some smaller drive-by fixes to replace the old strings with the new
variant names introduced by #5273
Part of #4743, follow-up of #5247.
## Problem
For #4743, we want to convert everything up to the actual I/O operations
of `VirtualFile` to `async fn`.
## Summary of changes
This PR is the last change in a series of changes to `VirtualFile`:
#5189, #5190, #5195, #5203, and #5224.
It does the last preparations before the I/O operations are actually
made async. We are doing the following things:
* First, we change the locks for the file descriptor cache to tokio's
locks that support Send. This is important when one wants to hold locks
across await points (which we want to do), otherwise the Future won't be
Send. Also, one shouldn't generally block in async code as executors
don't like that.
* Due to the lock change, we now take an approach for the `VirtualFile`
destructors similar to the one proposed by #5122 for the page cache, to
use `try_write`. Similarly to the situation in the linked PR, one can
make an argument that if we are in the destructor and the slot has not
been reused yet, we are the only user accessing the slot due to owning
the lock mutably. It is still possible that we are not obtaining the
lock, but the only cause for that is the clock algorithm touching the
slot, which should be quite an unlikely occurence. For the instance of
`try_write` failing, we spawn an async task to destroy the lock. As just
argued however, most of the time the code path where we spawn the task
should not be visited.
* Lastly, we split `with_file` into a macro part, and a function part
that contains most of the logic. The function part returns a lock
object, that the macro uses. The macro exists to perform the operation
in a more compact fashion, saving code from putting the lock into a
variable and then doing the operation while measuring the time to run
it. We take the locks approach because Rust has no support for async
closures. One can make normal closures return a future, but that
approach gets into lifetime issues the moment you want to pass data to
these closures via parameters that has a lifetime (captures work). For
details, see
[this](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2023/03/29/thoughts-on-async-closures/)
and
[this](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/function-that-takes-an-async-closure/61663)
link. In #5224, we ran into a similar problem with the `test_files`
function, and we ended up passing the path and the `OpenOptions`
by-value instead of by-ref, at the expense of a few extra copies. This
can be done as the data is cheaply copyable, and we are in test code.
But here, we are not, and while `File::try_clone` exists, it [issues
system calls
internally](1e746d7741/library/std/src/os/fd/owned.rs (L94-L111)).
Also, it would allocate an entirely new file descriptor, something that
the fd cache was built to prevent.
* We change the `STORAGE_IO_TIME` metrics to support async.
Part of #4743.
Introduce the `StorageIoOperation` enum, `StorageIoTime` struct, and
`STORAGE_IO_TIME_METRIC` static which provides lockless access to
histograms consumed by `VirtualFile`.
Closes#5131
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
Assorted flakyness fixes from #5198, might not be flaky on `main`.
Migrate some tests using neon_simple_env to just neon_env_builder and
using initial_tenant to make flakyness understanding easier. (Did not
understand the flakyness of
`test_timeline_create_break_after_uninit_mark`.)
`test_download_remote_layers_api` is flaky because we have no atomic
"wait for WAL, checkpoint, wait for upload and do not receive any more
WAL".
`test_tenant_size` fixes are just boilerplate which should had always
existed; we should wait for the tenant to be active. similarly for
`test_timeline_delete`.
`test_timeline_size_post_checkpoint` fails often for me with reading
zero from metrics. Give it a few attempts.
## Problem
Detaching a tenant can involve many thousands of local filesystem
metadata writes, but the control plane would benefit from us not
blocking detach/delete responses on these.
## Summary of changes
After rename of local tenant directory ack tenant detach and delete
tenant directory in background
#5183
---------
Signed-off-by: Rahul Modpur <rmodpur2@gmail.com>
## Problem
Another thing I overlooked regarding'approved-for-ci-run`:
- When we create a PR, the action is associated with @vipvap and this
triggers the pipeline — this is good.
- When we update the PR by force-pushing to the branch, the action is
associated with @github-actions, which doesn't trigger a pipeline — this
is bad.
Initially spotted in #5239 / #5211
([link](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/6122249456/job/16633919558?pr=5239))
— `check-permissions` should not fail.
## Summary of changes
- Use `CI_ACCESS_TOKEN` to check out the repo (I expect this token will
be reused in the following `git push`)
## Problem
When PR `ci-run/pr-*` is created the GitHub Autocomment with test
results are supposed to be posted to the original PR, currently, this
doesn't work.
I created this PR from a personal fork to debug and fix the issue.
## Summary of changes
- `scripts/comment-test-report.js`: use `pull_request.head` instead of
`pull_request.base` 🤦
## Problem
Add a CI pipeline that checks GitHub Workflows with
https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint (it uses `shellcheck` for shell
scripts in steps)
To run it locally: `SHELLCHECK_OPTS=--exclude=SC2046,SC2086 actionlint`
## Summary of changes
- Add `.github/workflows/actionlint.yml`
- Fix actionlint warnings
Some VMs, when already scaled up as much as possible, end up spamming
the autoscaler-agent with upscale requests that will never be fulfilled.
If postgres is using memory greater than the cgroup's memory.high, it
can emit new memory.high events 1000 times per second, which... just
means unnecessary load on the rest of the system.
This changes the vm-monitor so that we skip sending upscale requests if
we already sent one within the last second, to avoid spamming the
autoscaler-agent. This matches previous behavior that the vm-informant
hand.
