Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Stas Kelvic <stas@neon.tech>
# Context
This PR contains PoC-level changes for a product feature that allows
onboarding large databases into Neon without going through the regular
data path.
# Changes
This internal RFC provides all the context
* https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/pull/19799
In the language of the RFC, this PR covers
* the Importer code (`fast_import`)
* all the Pageserver changes (mgmt API changes, flow implementation,
etc)
* a basic test for the Pageserver changes
# Reviewing
As acknowledged in the RFC, the code added in this PR is not ready for
general availability.
Also, the **architecture is not to be discussed in this PR**, but in the
RFC and associated Slack channel instead.
Reviewers of this PR should take that into consideration.
The quality bar to apply during review depends on what area of the code
is being reviewed:
* Importer code (`fast_import`): practically anything goes
* Core flow (`flow.rs`):
* Malicious input data must be expected and the existing threat models
apply.
* The code must not be safe to execute on *dedicated* Pageserver
instances:
* This means in particular that tenants *on other* Pageserver instances
must not be affected negatively wrt data confidentiality, integrity or
availability.
* Other code: the usual quality bar
* Pay special attention to correct use of gate guards, timeline
cancellation in all places during shutdown & migration, etc.
* Consider the broader system impact; if you find potentially
problematic interactions with Storage features that were not covered in
the RFC, bring that up during the review.
I recommend submitting three separate reviews, for the three high-level
areas with different quality bars.
# References
(Internal-only)
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/17507
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/company_projects/issues/293
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/company_projects/issues/309
* refs https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/20646
---------
Co-authored-by: Stas Kelvich <stas.kelvich@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: John Spray <john@neon.tech>
## Problem
Follow up of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9682, that patch
didn't fully address the problem: what if shutdown fails due to whatever
reason and then we reattach the tenant? Then we will still remove the
future layer. The underlying problem is that the fix for #5878 gets
voided because of the generation optimizations.
Of course, we also need to ensure that delete happens after uploads, but
note that we only schedule deletes when there are no ongoing upload
tasks, so that's fine.
## Summary of changes
* Add a test case to reproduce the behavior (by changing the original
test case to attach the same generation).
* If layer upload happens after the deletion, drain the deletion queue
before uploading.
* If blocked_deletion is enabled, directly remove it from the
blocked_deletion queue.
* Local fs backend fix to avoid race between deletion and preload.
* test_emergency_mode does not need to wait for uploads (and it's
generally not possible to wait for uploads).
* ~~Optimize deletion executor to skip validation if there are no files
to delete.~~ this doesn't work
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
The HTTP router allowlists matched both on the path and the query
string. This meant that only `/profile/cpu` would be allowed without
auth, while `/profile/cpu?format=svg` would require auth.
Follows #9764.
## Summary of changes
* Match allowlists on URI path, rather than the entire URI.
* Fix the allowlist for Safekeeper to use `/profile/cpu` rather than the
old `/pprof/profile`.
* Just use a constant slice for the allowlist; it's only a handful of
items, and these handlers are not on hot paths.
## Problem
In https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9754 and the flakiness of
`test_readonly_node_gc`, we saw that although our logic for controlling
GC was sound, the validation of getpage requests was not, because it
could not consider LSN leases when requests arrived shortly after
restart.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9754
## Summary of changes
This is the "Option 3" discussed verbally -- rather than holding back gc
cutoff, we waive the usual validation of request LSN if we are still
waiting for leases to be sent after startup
- When validating LSN in `wait_or_get_last_lsn`, skip the validation
relative to GC cutoff if the timeline is still in its LSN lease grace
period
- Re-enable test_readonly_node_gc
## Problem
We don't have a convenient way to gather CPU profiles from a running
binary, e.g. during production incidents or end-to-end benchmarks, nor
during microbenchmarks (particularly on macOS).
We would also like to have continuous profiling in production, likely
using [Grafana Cloud
Profiles](https://grafana.com/products/cloud/profiles-for-continuous-profiling/).
We may choose to use either eBPF profiles or pprof profiles for this
(pending testing and discussion with SREs), but pprof profiles appear
useful regardless for the reasons listed above. See
https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/14888.
This PR is intended as a proof of concept, to try it out in staging and
drive further discussions about profiling more broadly.
Touches #9534.
Touches https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/14888.
## Summary of changes
Adds a HTTP route `/profile/cpu` that takes a CPU profile and returns
it. Defaults to a 5-second pprof Protobuf profile for use with e.g.
`pprof` or Grafana Alloy, but can also emit an SVG flamegraph. Query
parameters:
* `format`: output format (`pprof` or `svg`)
* `frequency`: sampling frequency in microseconds (default 100)
* `seconds`: number of seconds to profile (default 5)
Also integrates pprof profiles into Criterion benchmarks, such that
flamegraph reports can be taken with `cargo bench ... --profile-duration
<seconds>`. Output under `target/criterion/*/profile/flamegraph.svg`.
Example profiles:
* pprof profile (use [`pprof`](https://github.com/google/pprof)):
[profile.pb.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17756788/profile.pb.gz)
* Web interface: `pprof -http :6060 profile.pb.gz`
* Interactive flamegraph:
[profile.svg.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17756782/profile.svg.gz)
## Problem
We saw a scale test failure when one shard went
secondary->attached->secondary in a short period of time -- the metrics
for the shard failed a validation assertion that is meant to ensure the
size metric matches the sum of layer sizes in the SecondaryDetail
struct.
This appears to be due to two SecondaryTenants being alive at the same
time -- the first one was shut down but still had its contributions to
the metrics.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9628
## Summary of changes
- Refactor code for validating metrics and call it in shutdown as well
as during downloads
- Move code for dropping per-tenant secondary metrics from drop() into
shutdown(), so that once shutdown() completes it is definitely safe to
instantiate another SecondaryTenant for the same tenant.
## Problem
We were hitting this assertion in debug mode tests sometimes.
This case was being hit when the parent shard has no resident layers.
For instance, this is the case on split retry where the previous attempt
shut-down the parent and deleted local state for it. If the logical size
calculation does not download some layers before we get to the
hardlinking, then the assertion is hit.
## Summary of Changes
Remove the assertion. It's fine for the ancestor to not have any
resident layers at the time of the split.
Closes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9412
