- Group tests by Postgres version
- Merge different build types
- Add a command to GitHub comment on how to rerun all failed tests
(different command for different Postgres versions)
- Restore a link to a test report in the build summary
This is prep for https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4255
[1/X] OpenAPI: share a single definition of TenantConfig
DRYs up the pageserver OpenAPI YAML's representation of
tenant config.
All the fields of tenant config are now located in a model schema
called TenantConfig.
The tenant create & config-change endpoints have separate schemas,
TenantCreateInfo and TenantConfigureArg, respectively.
These schemas inherit from TenantConfig, using allOf 1.
The tenant config-GET handler's response was previously named
TenantConfig.
It's now named TenantConfigResponse.
None of these changes affect how the request looks on the wire.
The generated Go code will change for Console because the OpenAPI code
generator maps `allOf` to a Go struct embedding.
Luckily, usage of tenant config in Console is still very lightweigt,
but that will change in the near future.
So, this is a good chance to set things straight.
The console changes are tracked in
https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/pull/5046
[2/x]: extract the tenant config parts of create & config requests
[3/x]: code movement: move TenantConfigRequestConfig next to
TenantCreateRequestConfig
[4/x] type-alias TenantConfigRequestConfig = TenantCreateRequestConfig;
They are exactly the same.
[5/x] switch to qualified use for tenant create/config request api
models
[6/x] rename models::TenantConfig{RequestConfig,} and remove the alias
[7/x] OpenAPI: sync tenant create & configure body names from Rust code
[8/x]: dedupe the two TryFrom<...> for TenantConfOpt impls
The only difference is that the TenantConfigRequest impl does
```
tenant_conf.max_lsn_wal_lag = request_data.max_lsn_wal_lag;
tenant_conf.trace_read_requests = request_data.trace_read_requests;
```
and the TenantCreateRequest impl does
```
if let Some(max_lsn_wal_lag) = request_data.max_lsn_wal_lag {
tenant_conf.max_lsn_wal_lag = Some(max_lsn_wal_lag);
}
if let Some(trace_read_requests) = request_data.trace_read_requests {
tenant_conf.trace_read_requests = Some(trace_read_requests);
}
```
As far as I can tell, these are identical.
## Problem
`neondatabase/zenith-coverage-data` is too big:
- It takes ~6 minutes to clone and push the repo
- GitHub fails to publish an HTML report to github.io
Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/3543
## Summary of changes
Replace pushing code coverage report to
`neondatabase/zenith-coverage-data` with uploading it to S3
With this patch, the attach handler now follows the same pattern as
tenant create with regards to instantiation of the new tenant:
1. Prepare on-disk state using `create_tenant_files`.
2. Use the same code path as pageserver startup to load it into memory
and start background loops (`schedule_local_tenant_processing`).
It's a bit sad we can't use the
`PageServerConfig::tenant_attaching_mark_file_path` method inside
`create_tenant_files` because it operates in a temporary directory.
However, it's a small price to pay for the gained simplicity.
During implementation, I noticed that we don't handle failures post
`create_tenant_files` well. I left TODO comments in the code linking to
the issue that I created for this [^1].
Also, I'll dedupe the spawn_load and spawn_attach code in a future
commit.
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/1555
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/886 (Tenant
Relocation)
[^1]: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4233
## Problem
Compatibility tests don't support Postgres 15 yet, but we're still
trying to upload compatibility snapshot (which we do not collect).
Ref
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/4991394158/jobs/8940369368#step:4:38129
## Summary of changes
Add `pg_version` parameter to `run-python-test-set` actions and do not
upload compatibility snapshot for Postgres 15
This commit replaces all usages of connection_manager.rs:
wait_for_active_timeline with Timeline::wait_to_become_active.
wait_to_become_active is better and in the right module.
close https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4189
Co-authored-by: Shany Pozin <shany@neon.tech>
Use an enum instead of an array. Before that there was no connection
between definition of the metric and point where it was used aside from
matching string literals. Now its possible to use IDE features to check
for references. Also this allows to avoid mismatch between set of
metrics that was defined and set of metrics that was actually used
What is interesting is that `init logical size` case is not used. I
think `LogicalSize` is a duplicate of `InitLogicalSize`. So removed the latter.
Conflicts:
- Changes in PG15's xlogrecovery.c resulted in non-substantial conflicts between
ecb01e6ebb5a67f3fc00840695682a8b1ba40461 and
aee72b7be903e52d9bdc6449aa4c17fb852d8708
Fixes#4207
This PR is simply the patch from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4008 except we enabled
`force_path_style` for custom endpoints. This is because at some
version, the s3 sdk by default uses the virtual-host style access, which
is not supported by MinIO in the default configuration. By enforcing
path style access for custom endpoints, we can pass all e2e test cases.
SDK 0.55 is not the latest version and we can bump it further later when
all flaky tests in this PR are resolved.
This PR also (hopefully) fixes flaky test
`test_ondemand_download_timetravel`.
close https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4008
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi <iskyzh@gmail.com>
Should fix flakiness caused by the error
```
FATAL: could not resize shared memory segment "/PostgreSQL.3944613150" to 1048576 bytes: No space left on device
```
## Describe your changes
`pageserver_disconnect()` calls `PQfinish()` which deallocates resources
on the connection structure. `PQerrorMessage()` hands back a pointer to
an allocated resource. Duplicate the error message prior to calling
`pageserver_disconnect()`.
## Issue ticket number and link
Fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4214
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [x] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [x] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [x] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [x] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Await for upload to complete before returning 201 Created on
`branch_timeline` or when `bootstrap_timeline` happens. Should either of
those waits fail, then on the retried request await for uploads again.
This should work as expected assuming control-plane does not start to
use timeline creation as a wait_for_upload mechanism.
Fixes#3865, started from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/3857/files#r1144468177
Co-authored-by: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@neon.tech>
After tenant attach, there is a window where the child timeline is
loaded and accepts GetPage requests, but its parent is not. If a
GetPage request needs to traverse to the parent, it needs to wait for
the parent timeline to become active, or it might miss some records on
the parent timeline.
It's also possible that the parent timeline is active, but it hasn't
yet received all the WAL up to the branch point from the safekeeper.
This happens if a pageserver crashes soon after creating a timeline,
so that the WAL leading to the branch point has not yet been uploaded
to remote storage. After restart, the WAL will be re-streamed and
ingested from the safekeeper, but that takes a while. Because of that,
it's not enough to check that the parent timeline is active, we also
need to wait for the WAL to arrive on the parent timeline, just like
at the beginning of GetPage handling. We probably should change the
behavior at create_timeline so that a timeline can only be created
after all the WAL up to the branch point has been uploaded to remote
storage, but that's not currently the case and out of scope for this
PR (see github issue #4218).
@NanoBjorn encountered this while working on tenant migration. After
migrating a tenant with a parent and child branch, connecting to the
child branch failed with an error like:
```
FATAL: "base/16385" is not a valid data directory
DETAIL: File "base/16385/PG_VERSION" is missing.
```
This commit adds two tests that reproduce the bug, with slightly
different symptoms.
Before this PR, the gather_inputs() calls made to imitate synthetic size
calculation accesses were accounted towards the real logical size
calculation metric.
This PR forces all callers to declare the cause for making logical size
calculations, making the decision which cause counts towards which
metric explicit.
This is follow-up to
```
commit 1d266a6365
Author: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
Date: Thu May 11 16:09:29 2023 +0200
logical size calculation metrics: differentiate regular vs imitated (#4197)
```
After merging this patch, I hope to be able to explain why we have ca
30x more "logical size" ops in prod than "imitate logical size" for any
given observation interval.
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4154
We already have the warn!() log line for this condition. This PR adds a
corresponding metric on which we can have a dedicated alert. Cheaper and
more reliable than alerting on the logs, because, we run into log rate
limits from time to time these days.
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4222
Effectively, this means we use the tokio runtime's spawn_blocking-thread-pool
to execute the layer reads, instead of doing the reads on the
tokio runtime's main executor threads.
The use of the thread pool adds some overhead, but, not blocking
the main executor threads is more important, because they can now
execute other async tasks while we do the IO.
With a sufficiently large spawn_blocking-thread-pool, we also get more
IO parallelism between timelines than with blocking the main executor
threads. So, we might push the pageserver's NVMe closer to its limits.
But right now, there's lots of headroom.
fails with
cs@devvm:[~/src/neon]: cargo check -p pageserver --features testing
Checking pageserver v0.1.0 (/home/cs/src/neon/pageserver)
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> pageserver/src/tenant/timeline/walreceiver/connection_manager.rs:426:33
|
426 | let connection_handle = TaskHandle::spawn(move |events_sender, cancellation| {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ future created by async block is not `Send`
|
= help: within `Instrumented<[async block@pageserver/src/tenant/timeline/walreceiver/connection_manager.rs:427:13: 439:14]>`, the trait `std::marker::Send` is not implemented for `std::sync::RwLockReadGuard<'_, LayerMap<dyn PersistentLayer>>`
note: future is not `Send` as this value is used across an await
--> pageserver/src/tenant/timeline.rs:872:46
|
850 | let layers = self.layers.read().unwrap();
| ------ has type `std::sync::RwLockReadGuard<'_, LayerMap<dyn PersistentLayer>>` which is not `Send`
...
872 | self.freeze_inmem_layer(true).await;
| ^^^^^^ await occurs here, with `layers` maybe used later
...
881 | }
| - `layers` is later dropped here
note: required by a bound in `TaskHandle::<E>::spawn`
--> pageserver/src/tenant/timeline/walreceiver.rs:196:52
|
192 | fn spawn<Fut>(
| ----- required by a bound in this
...
196 | Fut: Future<Output = anyhow::Result<()>> + Send,
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `TaskHandle::<E>::spawn`
error: could not compile `pageserver` due to previous error
Without this, the seocnd read().unwrap() becomes an await point,
which makes the future not-Send, but, we require it to be Send
because it runs inside task_mgr::spawn, which requires the Fut's to be Send
- Timeline::get calls reconstruct data ⇒ turn that into a Pin<Box<dyn Future…>> .
- Problem there: we call layer.get_reconstruct_data while holding layer map lock ⇒ it’s a std rwlock ⇒ need to turn it into tokio mutex
- Problem there: we sometimes hold the Tenant::timelines std mutex while holding layer map lock (branching?) ⇒ need to turn it into tokio mutex
- Prolem there: tenant.rs `self.state.send_modify(|| { ... timelines.lock().await })`;
Can't await inside the closure, and we don't have async closures.
And we don't control the tokio::sync::watch API.
So, tackle things in reverse here.
This PR adds tests runs on Postgres 15 and created unified Allure report
with results for all tests.
- Split `.github/actions/allure-report` into
`.github/actions/allure-report-store` and
`.github/actions/allure-report-generate`
- Add debug or release pytest parameter for all tests (depending on
`BUILD_TYPE` env variable)
- Add Postgres version as a pytest parameter for all tests (depending on
`DEFAULT_PG_VERSION` env variable)
- Fix `test_wal_restore` and `restore_from_wal.sh` to support path with
`[`/`]` in it (fixed by applying spellcheck to the script and fixing all
warnings), `restore_from_wal_archive.sh` is deleted as unused.
- All known failures on Postgres 15 marked with xfail
While investigating https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4154 I
found that the `Calculating logical size for timeline` tracing events
created from within the logical size computation code are not always
attributable to the background task that caused it.
My goal is to be able to distinguish in the logs whether a `Calculating
logical size for timeline` was logged as part of a real synthetic size
calculation VS an imitation by the eviction task.
I want this distinction so I can prove my assumption that the disk IO
peaks which we see every 24h on prod are due to eviction's imitate
synthetic size calculations.
The alternative here, which I would have preferred, but is more work:
link RequestContext's into a child->parent list and dump this list when
we log `Calculating logical size for timeline`.
I would have preferred that over what we have in this PR because,
technically, the ondemand logical size computation can outlive the
caller that spawned it. This is against the idea of correctly nested
spans.
I guess in OpenTelemetry land, the correct modelling would be a link
between the caller's span and the task_mgr task's span.
Anyways, I think the case where we hang up on the spawned ondemand
logical size calculation is quite rare. So, I'm willing to tolerate
incorrectly nested spans for these edge-cases.
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4154
I would like to know whether and by how much the eviction iterations
spike in the $period-sized window that happens every $threshold , when
all the timelines do the imitate accesses.
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4154
I tried to use failpoint_sleep_millis_async(...) in a source file that
didn't do `use std::time::Duration`, and got a compiler error:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `Duration`
--> pageserver/src/walingest.rs:316:17
|
316 | utils::failpoint_sleep_millis_async!("wal-ingest-logical-message-sleep");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `utils::failpoint_sleep_millis_async` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: consider importing one of these items
|
24 | use chrono::Duration;
|
24 | use core::time::Duration;
|
24 | use humantime::Duration;
|
24 | use serde_with::__private__::Duration;
|
and 2 other candidates
```
I want this distinction so I can prove my assumption that the disk IO
peaks which we see every 24h on prod are due to eviction's imitate
synthetic size calculations.
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/4154
Control Plane currently [^1] polls for `has_in_progress_downloads ==
false` after /attach to determine that an attach operation succeeded.
As pointed out in the OpenAPI spec as of neon#4151, polling for
`has_in_progress_downloads` is incorrect.
This patch changes the situation by
- removing `has_in_progress_downloads`
- adding a new field `attachment_status.`
- changing instructions for `/attach` to poll for `attachment_status ==
attached`.
This makes the instructions in `/attach` actionable for Control Plane.
NB that we don't expose the TenantState in the OpenAPI docs, even though
we expose it in the endpoint. That is with good reason because we don't
want to commit to a fixed set of tenant states forever. Hence, the
separate `attachment_status` field that exposes the bare minimum
required to make /attach + subsequent polling 100% safe wrt split brain.
It would have been nice to report failures explicitly, but the problem
is that we lose that state when we restart. So, we return `attached`
upon attach failure. The tenant is Broken in that case, causing Control
Plane's subsequent health check will fail. Control Plane can roll back
the relocation operation then.
NB: the reliance on the subsequent health check is no change to what we
had before this patch!
NB: we can always add additional TenantAttachmentStatus'es in the future
to communicate failure.
This PR also moves the attach-marker file's creation to the API
handler's synchronous part. That was done to avoid the need to
distinguish
* `Attaching but marker not yet written => AttachmentStatus::Maybe` from
* `Attaching, marker written, but attach failed for other reason =>
AttachmentStatus::Attached`
Coincidentally, this also adds more transactionality to the /attach API
because we only return 202 once we've written the marker file. But, in
the end, it doesn't affect how the control plane interacts with us or
how it needs to do retries. So, we don't mention any of this in the API
docs.
[^1]: The one-click tenant relocation PR cloud#4740, currently WIP, is
the first real user.
