## Problem
We've got several issues with the current `benchmarks` job setup:
- `benchmark_durations.json` file (that we generate in runtime to
split tests into several jobs[0]) is not consistent between these
jobs (and very not consistent with the file if we rerun the job). I.e.
test selection for each job can be different, which could end up in
missed tests in a test run.
- `scripts/benchmark_durations` doesn't fetch all tests from the
database (it doesn't expect any extra directories inside
`test_runner/performance`)
- For some reason, currently split into 4 groups ends up with the 4th
group has no tests to run, which fails the job[1]
- [0] https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4683
- [1] https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6629
## Summary of changes
- Generate `benchmark_durations.json` file once before we start
`benchmarks` jobs (this makes it consistent across the jobs) and pass
the file content through the GitHub Actions input (this makes it
consistent for reruns)
- `scripts/benchmark_durations` fix SQL query for getting all required
tests
- Split benchmarks into 5 jobs instead of 4 jobs.
## Problem
We were archiving the pref benchmarks to
- neon DB
- git repo `zenith-perf-data`
As the pref batch ran in parallel when the uploading of results to
zenith-perf-data` git repo resulted in merge conflicts.
Which made the run flaky and as a side effect the build started failing
.
The problem is been expressed in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5160
## Summary of changes
As the results were not used from the git repo it was redundant hence in
this PR cleaning up the results uploading of of perf results to git repo
The shell script `generate_and_push_perf_report.sh` was using a py
script
[git-upload](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/compare/remove-perf-benchmark-git-upload?expand=1#diff-c6d938e7f060e487367d9dc8055245c82b51a73c1f97956111a495a8a86e9a33)
and
[scripts/generate_perf_report_page.py](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6590/files#diff-81af2147e72d07e4cf8ee4395632596d805d6168ba75c71cab58db2659956ef8)
which are not used anywhere else in repo hence also cleaning that up
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat the commit message to not include the
above checklist
## Problem
We have switched to new test results and new coverage results, so no
need to collect these data in old formats.
## Summary of changes
- Remove "Upload coverage report" for old coverage report
- Remove "Store Allure test stat in the DB" for old test results format
## Problem
`black` is slow sometimes, we can replace it with `ruff format` (a new
feature in 0.1.2 [0]), which produces pretty similar to black style [1].
On my local machine (MacBook M1 Pro 16GB):
```
# `black` on main
$ hyperfine "BLACK_CACHE_DIR=/dev/null poetry run black ."
Benchmark 1: BLACK_CACHE_DIR=/dev/null poetry run black .
Time (mean ± σ): 3.131 s ± 0.090 s [User: 5.194 s, System: 0.859 s]
Range (min … max): 3.047 s … 3.354 s 10 runs
```
```
# `ruff format` on the current PR
$ hyperfine "RUFF_NO_CACHE=true poetry run ruff format"
Benchmark 1: RUFF_NO_CACHE=true poetry run ruff format
Time (mean ± σ): 300.7 ms ± 50.2 ms [User: 259.5 ms, System: 76.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 267.5 ms … 420.2 ms 10 runs
```
## Summary of changes
- Replace `black` with `ruff format` everywhere
- [0] https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/
- [1] https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/#black-compatibility
## Problem
Some existing tests are written in a way that's incompatible with tenant
generations.
## Summary of changes
Update all the tests that need updating: this is things like calling
through the NeonPageserver.tenant_attach helper to get a generation
number, instead of calling directly into the pageserver API. There are
various more subtle cases.
## Problem
We started to store test results in a new format in
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4549.
This PR switches scripts to query this db.
(we can completely remove old DB/ingestions scripts in a couple of
weeks after the PR merged)
## Summary of changes
- `scripts/benchmark_durations.py` query new database
- `scripts/flaky_tests.py` query new database
## Problem
When PR `ci-run/pr-*` is created the GitHub Autocomment with test
results are supposed to be posted to the original PR, currently, this
doesn't work.
I created this PR from a personal fork to debug and fix the issue.
## Summary of changes
- `scripts/comment-test-report.js`: use `pull_request.head` instead of
`pull_request.base` 🤦
## Problem
A bunch of fixes for different test-related things
## Summary of changes
- Fix test_runner/pg_clients (`subprocess_capture` return value has
changed)
- Do not run create-test-report if check-permissions failed for not
cancelled jobs
- Fix Code Coverage comment layout after flaky tests. Add another
healing "\n"
- test_compatibility: add an instruction for local run
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
## Problem
We've got `approved-for-ci-run` to work 🎉
But it's still a bit rough, this PR should improve the UX for external
contributors.
## Summary of changes
- `build_and_test.yml`: add `check-permissions` job, which fails if PR is
created from a fork. Make all jobs in the workflow to be dependant on
`check-permission` to fail fast
- `approved-for-ci-run.yml`: add `cleanup` job to close `ci-run/pr-*`
PRs and delete linked branches when the parent PR is closed
- `approved-for-ci-run.yml`: fix the layout for the `ci-run/pr-*` PR
description
- GitHub Autocomment: add a comment with tests result to the original PR
(instead of a PR from `ci-run/pr-*` )
## Problem
- `SCALE: unbound variable` from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/5079
- The layout of the GitHub auto-comment is broken if the code coverage
section follows flaky test section from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4999
## Summary of changes
- `benchmarking.yml`: Rename `SCALE` to `TEST_OLAP_SCALE`
- `comment-test-report.js`: Add an extra new-line before Code coverage
section
## Problem
We still need to rerun some builds manually because flaky tests weren't
detected automatically.
I found two reasons for it:
- If a test is flaky on a particular build type, on a particular
Postgres version, there's a high chance that this test is flaky on all
configurations, but we don't automatically detect such cases.
- We detect flaky tests only on the main branch, which requires manual
retrigger runs for freshly made flaky tests.
Both of them are fixed in the PR.
## Summary of changes
- Spread flakiness of a single test to all configurations
- Detect flaky tests in all branches (not only in the main)
- Look back only at 7 days of test history (instead of 10)
## Problem
The current test history format is a bit inconvenient:
- It stores all test results in one row, so all queries should include
subqueries which expand the test
- It includes duplicated test results if the rerun is triggered manually
for one of the test jobs (for example, if we rerun `debug-pg14`, then
the report will include duplicates for other build types/postgres
versions)
- It doesn't have a reference to run_id, which we use to create a link
to allure report
Here's the proposed new format:
```
id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
parent_suite TEXT NOT NULL,
suite TEXT NOT NULL,
name TEXT NOT NULL,
status TEXT NOT NULL,
started_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
stopped_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL,
duration INT NOT NULL,
flaky BOOLEAN NOT NULL,
build_type TEXT NOT NULL,
pg_version INT NOT NULL,
run_id BIGINT NOT NULL,
run_attempt INT NOT NULL,
reference TEXT NOT NULL,
revision CHAR(40) NOT NULL,
raw JSONB COMPRESSION lz4 NOT NULL,
```
## Summary of changes
- Misc allure changes:
- Update allure to 2.23.1
- Delete files from previous runs in HTML report (by using `sync
--delete` instead of `mv`)
- Use `test-cases/*.json` instead of `suites.json`, using this directory
allows us to catch all reruns.
- Until we migrated `scripts/flaky_tests.py` and
`scripts/benchmark_durations.py` store test results in 2 formats (in 2
different databases).
Add infrastructure to dynamically load postgres extensions and shared libraries from remote extension storage.
Before postgres start downloads list of available remote extensions and libraries, and also downloads 'shared_preload_libraries'. After postgres is running, 'compute_ctl' listens for HTTP requests to load files.
Postgres has new GUC 'extension_server_port' to specify port on which 'compute_ctl' listens for requests.
When PostgreSQL requests a file, 'compute_ctl' downloads it.
See more details about feature design and remote extension storage layout in docs/rfcs/024-extension-loading.md
---------
Co-authored-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <anastasia@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alek Westover <alek.westover@gmail.com>
We need some real extensions in S3 to accurately test the code for
handling remote extensions.
In this PR we just upload three extensions (anon, kq_imcx and postgis), which is
enough for testing purposes for now. In addition to creating and
uploading the extension archives, we must generate a file
`ext_index.json` which specifies important metadata about the
extensions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <anastasia@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Bayandin <alexander@neon.tech>
## Problem
Benchmarks run takes about an hour on main branch (in a single job),
which delays pipeline results. And it takes another hour if we want to
restart the job due to some failures.
## Summary of changes
- Use `pytest-split` plugin to run benchmarks on separate CI runners in
4 parallel jobs
- Add `scripts/benchmark_durations.py` for getting benchmark durations
from the database to help `pytest-split` schedule tests more evenly. It
uses p99 for the last 10 days' results (durations).
The current distribution could be better; each worker's durations vary
from 9m to 35m, but this could be improved in consequent PRs.
## Problem
Postgres submodule can be changed unintentionally, and these changes are
easy to miss during the review.
Adding a check that should prevent this from happening, the check fails
`build-neon` job with the following message:
```
Expected postgres-v14 rev to be at '1414141414141414141414141414141414141414', but it is at '1144aee1661c79eec65e784a8dad8bd450d9df79'
Expected postgres-v15 rev to be at '1515151515151515151515151515151515151515', but it is at '1984832c740a7fa0e468bb720f40c525b652835d'
Please update vendors/revisions.json if these changes are intentional.
```
This is an alternative approach to
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4603
## Summary of changes
- Add `vendor/revisions.json` file with expected revisions
- Add built-time check (to `build-neon` job) that Postgres submodules
match revisions from `vendor/revisions.json`
- A couple of small improvements for logs from
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4603
- Fixed GitHub autocomment for no tests was run case
---------
Co-authored-by: Joonas Koivunen <joonas@neon.tech>
## Problem
All tests have already been parametrised by Postgres version and build
type (to have them distinguishable in the Allure report), but despite
it, it's anyway required to have DEFAULT_PG_VERSION and BUILD_TYPE env
vars set to corresponding values, for example to
run`test_timeline_deletion_with_files_stuck_in_upload_queue[release-pg14-local_fs]`
test it's required to set `DEFAULT_PG_VERSION=14` and
`BUILD_TYPE=release`.
This PR makes the test framework pick up parameters from the test name
itself.
## Summary of changes
- Postgres version and build type related fixtures now are
function-scoped (instead of being sessions scoped before)
- Deprecate `--pg-version` argument in favour of DEFAULT_PG_VERSION env
variable (it's easier to parse)
- GitHub autocomment now includes only one command with all the failed
tests + runs them in parallel
## Problem
When I switched `psycopg2.connect` from context manager to a regular
function call in https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/4382 I
embarrassingly forgot about commit, so it doesn't really put data into DB 😞
## Summary of changes
- Enable autocommit for data ingestion scripts
## Problem
If the script fails to generate a test summary, the step also fails the
job/workflow (despite this could be a non-fatal problem).
## Summary of changes
- Separate JSON parsing and summarisation into separate functions
- Wrap functions calling into try..catch block, add an error message to
GitHub comment and do not fail the step
- Make `scripts/comment-test-report.js` a CLI script that can be run
locally (mock GitHub calls) to make it easier to debug issues locally
## Problem
In the future, we want to compare code coverage on a PR with coverage on
the main branch.
Currently, we store only code coverage HTML reports, I suggest we start
storing reports in "lcov info" format that we can use/parse in the
future. Currently, the file size is ~7Mb (it's a text-based format and
could be compressed into a ~400Kb archive)
- More about "lcov info" format:
https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/jammy/man1/geninfo.1.html#files
- Part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/3543
## Summary of changes
- Change `scripts/coverage` to output lcov coverage to
`report/lcov.info` file instead of stdout (we already upload the whole
`report/` directory to S3)
## Problem
GitHub Autocomment script posts a comment only for PRs. It's harder
to debug failed tests on main or release branches.
## Summary of changes
- Change the GitHub Autocomment script to be able to post a comment to
either a PR or a commit of a branch
## Problem
`pytest` 6 truncates error messages and this is not configured.
It's fixed in `pytest` 7, it prints the whole message (truncating limit
is higher) if `--verbose` is set (it's set on CI).
## Summary of changes
- `pytest` and `pytest` plugins are updated to their latest versions
- linters (`black` and `ruff`) are updated to their latest versions
- `mypy` and types are updated to their latest versions, new warnings
are fixed
- while we're here, allure updated its latest version as well
- Group tests by Postgres version
- Merge different build types
- Add a command to GitHub comment on how to rerun all failed tests
(different command for different Postgres versions)
- Restore a link to a test report in the build summary
This PR adds tests runs on Postgres 15 and created unified Allure report
with results for all tests.
- Split `.github/actions/allure-report` into
`.github/actions/allure-report-store` and
`.github/actions/allure-report-generate`
- Add debug or release pytest parameter for all tests (depending on
`BUILD_TYPE` env variable)
- Add Postgres version as a pytest parameter for all tests (depending on
`DEFAULT_PG_VERSION` env variable)
- Fix `test_wal_restore` and `restore_from_wal.sh` to support path with
`[`/`]` in it (fixed by applying spellcheck to the script and fixing all
warnings), `restore_from_wal_archive.sh` is deleted as unused.
- All known failures on Postgres 15 marked with xfail
- Increase `connect_timeout` to 30s, which should be enough for
most of the cases
- If the script cannot connect to the DB (or any other
`psycopg2.OperationalError` occur) — do not fail the script, log
the error and proceed. Problems with fetching flaky tests shouldn't
block the PR
This PR adds posting a comment with test results. Each workflow run
updates the comment with new results.
The layout and the information that we post can be changed to our needs,
right now, it contains failed tests and test which changes status after
rerun (i.e. flaky tests)
This PR adds a plugin that automatically reruns (up to 3 times) flaky
tests. Internally, it uses data from `TEST_RESULT_CONNSTR` database and
`pytest-rerunfailures` plugin.
As the first approximation we consider the test flaky if it has failed on
the main branch in the last 10 days.
Flaky tests are fetched by `scripts/flaky_tests.py` script (it's
possible to use it in a standalone mode to learn which tests are flaky),
stored to a JSON file, and then the file is passed to the pytest plugin.
This script can be used to remove tenant directories on safekeepers for
projects which do not longer exist (deleted in the console).
To run this script you need to upload it to safekeeper (i.e. with SSH),
and run it with python3. Ansible can be used to run this script on
multiple safekeepers.
Fixes https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/3356
