Protocol version 2 has been the default for a while now, and we no
longer have any computes running in production that used protocol
version 1. This completes the migration by removing support for v1 in
both the pageserver and the compute.
See issue #6211.
## Problem
Currently, we compare `neon.safekeepers` values as is, so we
unnecessarily restart walproposer even if safekeepers set didn't change.
This leads to errors like:
```log
FATAL: [WP] restarting walproposer to change safekeeper list
from safekeeper-8.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-11.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-10.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401
to safekeeper-11.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-8.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401,safekeeper-10.us-east-2.aws.neon.tech:6401
```
## Summary of changes
Split the GUC into the list of individual safekeepers and properly
compare. We could've done that somewhere on the upper level, e.g.,
control plane, but I think it's still better when the actual config
consumer is smarter and doesn't rely on upper levels.
## Problem
pg_hintplan test seems to be flaky, sometimes it fails, while usually it
passes
## Summary of changes
The regression test is changed to filter out the Neon service queries. The
expected file is changed as well.
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Routes and their handlers were in a bit different order in 1) routes
list 2) their implementation 3) python client 4) openapi spec, making
addition of new ones intimidating. Make it the same everywhere, roughly
lexicographically but preserving some of existing logic.
No functional changes.
Part of #8002, the final big PR in the batch.
## Summary of changes
This pull request uses the new split layer writer in the gc-compaction.
* It changes how layers are split. Previously, we split layers based on
the original split point, but this creates too many layers
(test_gc_feedback has one key per layer).
* Therefore, we first verify if the layer map can be processed by the
current algorithm (See https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/8191,
it's basically the same check)
* On that, we proceed with the compaction. This way, it creates a large
enough layer close to the target layer size.
* Added a new set of functions `with_discard` in the split layer writer.
This helps us skip layers if we are going to produce the same persistent
key.
* The delta writer will keep the updates of the same key in a single
file. This might create a super large layer, but we can optimize it
later.
* The split layer writer is used in the gc-compaction algorithm, and it
will split layers based on size.
* Fix the image layer summary block encoded the wrong key range.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
Co-authored-by: Arpad Müller <arpad-m@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Christian Schwarz <christian@neon.tech>
refs https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/6989
Problem
-------
After unclean shutdown, we get restarted, start reading the local
filesystem,
and make decisions based on those reads. However, some of the data might
have
not yet been fsynced when the unclean shutdown completed.
Durability matters even though Pageservers are conceptually just a cache
of state in S3. For example:
- the cloud control plane is no control loop => pageserver responses
to tenant attachmentm, etc, needs to be durable.
- the storage controller does not rely on this (as much?)
- we don't have layer file checksumming, so, downloaded+renamed but not
fsynced layer files are technically not to be trusted
- https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/2683
Solution
--------
`syncfs` the tenants directory during startup, before we start reading
from it.
This is a bit overkill because we do remove some temp files
(InMemoryLayer!)
later during startup. Further, these temp files are particularly likely
to
be dirty in the kernel page cache. However, we don't want to refactor
that
cleanup code right now, and the dirty data on pageservers is generally
not that high. Last, with [direct
IO](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8130) we're going to
have near-zero kernel page cache anyway quite soon.
This PR:
* Implements the rule that archived timelines require all of their
children to be archived as well, as specified in the RFC. There is no
fancy locking mechanism though, so the precondition can still be broken.
As a TODO for later, we still allow unarchiving timelines with archived
parents.
* Adds an `is_archived` flag to `TimelineInfo`
* Adds timeline_archival_config to `PageserverHttpClient`
* Adds a new `test_timeline_archive` test, loosely based on
`test_timeline_delete`
Part of #8088
## Problem
We need some metric to sneak peek into how many people use inbound
logical replication (Neon is a subscriber).
## Summary of changes
This commit adds a new metric `compute_subscriptions_count`, which is
number of subscriptions grouped by enabled/disabled state.
Resolves: neondatabase/cloud#16146
Add binary for local-proxy that uses the local auth backend. Runs only
the http serverless driver support and offers config reload based on a
config file and SIGHUP
## Problem
- If a reconciler was waiting to be able to notify computes about a
change, but the control plane was waiting for the controller to finish a
timeline creation/deletion, the overall system can deadlock.
- If a tenant shard was migrated concurrently with a timeline
creation/deletion, there was a risk that the timeline operation could be
applied to a non-latest-generation location, and thereby not really be
persistent. This has never happened in practice, but would eventually
happen at scale.
Closes: #8743
## Summary of changes
- Introduce `Service::tenant_remote_mutation` helper, which looks up
shards & generations and passes them into an inner function that may do
remote I/O to pageservers. Before returning success, this helper checks
that generations haven't incremented, to guarantee that changes are
persistent.
- Convert tenant_timeline_create, tenant_timeline_delete, and
tenant_timeline_detach_ancestor to use this helper.
- These functions no longer block on ensure_attached unless the tenant
was never attached at all, so they should make progress even if we can't
complete compute notifications.
This increases the database load from timeline/create operations, but
only with cheap read transactions.
## Problem
Previously, the controller only used the shard counts for scheduling.
This works well when hosting only many-sharded tenants, but works much
less well when hosting single-sharded tenants that have a greater
deviation in size-per-shard.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/7798
## Summary of changes
- Instead of UtilizationScore, carry the full PageserverUtilization
through into the Scheduler.
- Use the PageserverUtilization::score() instead of shard count when
ordering nodes in scheduling.
Q: Why did test_sharding_split_smoke need updating in this PR?
A: There's an interesting side effect during shard splits: because we do
not decrement the shard count in the utilization when we de-schedule the
shards from before the split, the controller will now prefer to pick
_different_ nodes for shards compared with which ones held secondaries
before the split. We could use our knowledge of splitting to fix up the
utilizations more actively in this situation, but I'm leaning toward
leaving the code simpler, as in practical systems the impact of one
shard on the utilization of a node should be fairly low (single digit
%).
In case of corrupted delta layers, we can detect the corruption and bail
out the compaction.
## Summary of changes
* Detect wrong delta desc of key range
* Detect unordered deltas
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
We have been naughty and curl-ed storcon to fix-up drains and fills.
## Summary of changes
Add support for starting/cancelling drain/fill operations via
`storcon_cli`.
close https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8579
## Summary of changes
The `is_l0` check now takes both layer key range and the layer type.
This allows us to have image layers covering the full key range in
btm-most compaction (upcoming PR). However, we still don't allow delta
layers to cover the full key range, and I will make btm-most compaction
to generate delta layers with the key range of the keys existing in the
layer instead of `Key::MIN..Key::HACK_MAX` (upcoming PR).
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
Failed / flaky tests for different arches don't have any difference in
GitHub Autocomment
## Summary of changes
- Add arch to build type for GitHub autocomment
Our new policy is to use the "rebase" method and slice all the Neon
commits into a nice patch set when doing a new major version, and use
"merge" method on minor version upgrades on the release branches.
"git merge" preserves the git history of Neon commits on the Postgres
branches. While it's nice to rebase all the Neon changes to a logical
patch set against upstream, having to do it between every minor release
is a fair amount work, and it loses the history, and is more
error-prone.
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8623
We want to discover potential aux v1 customers that we might have missed
from the migrations.
## Summary of changes
Log warnings on basebackup, load timeline, and the first put_file.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
See https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C07J14D8GTX/p1724347552023709
Manipulations with LRU list in relation size cache are performed under
shared lock
## Summary of changes
Take exclusive lock
## Checklist before requesting a review
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code.
- [ ] If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
- [ ] Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant
metrics to the dashboard?
- [ ] If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with
/release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.
## Checklist before merging
- [ ] Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above
checklist
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
This reverts commit cbe8c77997.
This change was originally made to test a hypothesis, but after that,
the proper fix#8669 was merged, so now it's not needed. Moreover, the
test is still flaky, so probably this bug was not a reason of the
flakiness.
Related to #8097
This copies a piece of code from `test_scrubber_physical_gc_ancestors`
to fix a source of flakiness: later on we rely on stuff being older than
a second, but the test can run faster under optimal conditions (as
happened to me locally, but also obvservable in
[this](https://neon-github-public-dev.s3.amazonaws.com/reports/main/10470762360/index.html#testresult/f713b02657db4b4c/retries)
allure report):
```
test_runner/regress/test_storage_scrubber.py:169: in test_scrubber_physical_gc
assert gc_summary["remote_storage_errors"] == 0
E assert 1 == 0
```
