leptos-shadcn-ui/docs/architecture/coverage-remediation-plan.md

Test Coverage Remediation Plan: Achieving 90%+ Coverage

Executive Summary

This document outlines a comprehensive strategy to achieve 90%+ test coverage across the leptos-shadcn-ui repository. Based on the current coverage analysis showing 62.5% overall coverage, this plan identifies critical gaps and provides actionable steps to improve coverage systematically.

Current State Analysis

📊 Baseline Coverage Metrics

• Overall Coverage: 62.5% (1,780/2,847 lines)
• Target Coverage: 90%+ (2,562+ lines)
• Gap to Close: 782+ lines (27.5% improvement needed)

🎯 Coverage by Component Type

Component Type	Current Coverage	Target Coverage	Priority
TDD Test Suites	100%	100%	✅ Complete
Performance Tests	100%	100%	✅ Complete
Integration Tests	96.6%	100%	🟡 Low
Component Tests	88.2%	95%	🟡 Low
Validation Systems	100%	100%	✅ Complete
Component Implementations	23.7-71.4%	90%+	🔴 Critical
Signal Management	0%	90%+	🔴 Critical
Compatibility Tests	0%	90%+	🔴 Critical
Test Utilities	0%	90%+	🔴 Critical

Phase 1: Critical Infrastructure (Weeks 1-2)

🔴 Priority 1: Fix Compilation Issues

1.1 Fix tailwind-rs-core Test Failures

# Current Issues:
# - test_tailwind_classes_creation: assertion failed on responsive classes
# - test_class_builder: assertion failed on responsive classes  
# - test_validate_class: validation logic issues
# - test_optimize_classes: class optimization problems

# Action Items:
1. Fix responsive class generation in TailwindClasses
2. Update validation patterns for missing utilities
3. Fix class optimization logic
4. Add missing test cases for edge conditions

1.2 Fix contract-testing Dependencies

# Add missing dependencies
cargo add anyhow chrono --package leptos-shadcn-contract-testing

# Fix compilation errors in:
# - tdd_expansion.rs (anyhow usage)
# - dependency_contracts.rs (chrono usage)

🔴 Priority 2: Zero Coverage Areas

2.1 Signal Management Coverage (0% → 90%)

Target Files: packages/leptos/button/src/signal_managed.rs

Test Strategy:

// Add comprehensive tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod signal_managed_tests {
    use super::*;
    
    // 1. Signal Creation and Initialization
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_creation_with_defaults() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_creation_with_custom_values() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Signal Updates and State Changes
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_update_mechanisms() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_state_transitions() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Memory Management
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_memory_cleanup() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_arc_management() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 4. Integration with Components
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_component_integration() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_theme_integration() { /* ... */ }
}

2.2 Compatibility Tests Coverage (0% → 90%)

Target Files: packages/leptos/input/src/leptos_v0_8_compatibility_tests.rs

Test Strategy:

// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod compatibility_tests {
    // 1. Attribute System Compatibility
    #[test]
    fn test_attribute_types_compatibility() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_attribute_handling() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Reserved Keyword Handling
    #[test]
    fn test_reserved_keyword_attributes() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Version Migration Scenarios
    #[test]
    fn test_version_migration_edge_cases() { /* ... */ }
}

2.3 Test Utilities Coverage (0% → 90%)

Target Files: packages/test-utils/src/

Test Strategy:

// Add tests for each utility module:
// - component_tester.rs
// - quality_checker.rs  
// - property_testing.rs
// - snapshot_testing.rs

#[cfg(test)]
mod test_utils_tests {
    // 1. Component Testing Utilities
    #[test]
    fn test_component_tester_functionality() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Quality Assessment Tools
    #[test]
    fn test_quality_checker_metrics() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Property-Based Testing
    #[test]
    fn test_property_testing_framework() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 4. Snapshot Testing
    #[test]
    fn test_snapshot_testing_utilities() { /* ... */ }
}

Phase 2: Component Implementation Coverage (Weeks 3-4)

🟡 Priority 3: Low Coverage Components

3.1 Button Component (30.6% → 90%)

Target Files: packages/leptos/button/src/default.rs

Missing Coverage Areas:

// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod button_implementation_tests {
    // 1. Component Rendering Logic
    #[test]
    fn test_button_rendering_with_all_variants() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_button_rendering_with_all_sizes() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Class Generation Logic
    #[test]
    fn test_button_class_generation_edge_cases() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_button_class_merging_logic() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Event Handling
    #[test]
    fn test_button_click_handling() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_button_keyboard_events() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 4. State Management
    #[test]
    fn test_button_disabled_state() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_button_loading_state() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 5. Error Conditions
    #[test]
    fn test_button_error_handling() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_button_invalid_props() { /* ... */ }
}

3.2 Input Component (23.7% → 90%)

Target Files: packages/leptos/input/src/default.rs

Missing Coverage Areas:

// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod input_implementation_tests {
    // 1. Input Rendering Logic
    #[test]
    fn test_input_rendering_with_all_types() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_input_rendering_with_validation() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Value Handling
    #[test]
    fn test_input_value_updates() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_input_value_validation() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Event Handling
    #[test]
    fn test_input_change_events() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_input_focus_events() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 4. Validation Integration
    #[test]
    fn test_input_validation_integration() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_input_error_display() { /* ... */ }
}

3.3 Card Component (71.4% → 90%)

Target Files: packages/leptos/card/src/default.rs

Missing Coverage Areas:

// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod card_implementation_tests {
    // 1. Card Structure Rendering
    #[test]
    fn test_card_structure_rendering() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_card_header_footer_rendering() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Content Management
    #[test]
    fn test_card_content_handling() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_card_empty_state_handling() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Interactive Features
    #[test]
    fn test_card_interactive_behavior() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_card_click_handling() { /* ... */ }
}

🟡 Priority 4: New York Variants (0% → 90%)

4.1 New York Button Variant

Target Files: packages/leptos/button/src/new_york.rs

Test Strategy:

#[cfg(test)]
mod new_york_button_tests {
    // 1. Variant-Specific Rendering
    #[test]
    fn test_new_york_button_rendering() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Style Differences
    #[test]
    fn test_new_york_button_styles() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Behavior Differences
    #[test]
    fn test_new_york_button_behavior() { /* ... */ }
}

Phase 3: Advanced Coverage (Weeks 5-6)

🟢 Priority 5: Edge Cases and Error Handling

5.1 Comprehensive Error Testing

// Add tests for all components:
#[cfg(test)]
mod error_handling_tests {
    // 1. Invalid Props
    #[test]
    fn test_invalid_prop_handling() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Edge Cases
    #[test]
    fn test_edge_case_scenarios() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Resource Exhaustion
    #[test]
    fn test_resource_exhaustion_handling() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 4. Concurrent Access
    #[test]
    fn test_concurrent_access_safety() { /* ... */ }
}

5.2 Performance Edge Cases

// Add performance tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod performance_edge_tests {
    // 1. Large Dataset Handling
    #[test]
    fn test_large_dataset_performance() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Memory Pressure
    #[test]
    fn test_memory_pressure_handling() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Rapid State Changes
    #[test]
    fn test_rapid_state_change_performance() { /* ... */ }
}

🟢 Priority 6: Integration Coverage

6.1 Cross-Component Integration

// Add integration tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod integration_tests {
    // 1. Component Combinations
    #[test]
    fn test_button_input_integration() { /* ... */ }
    #[test]
    fn test_card_form_integration() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 2. Theme System Integration
    #[test]
    fn test_theme_system_integration() { /* ... */ }
    
    // 3. Signal System Integration
    #[test]
    fn test_signal_system_integration() { /* ... */ }
}

Implementation Strategy

📋 Week-by-Week Breakdown

Week 1: Infrastructure Fixes

• Fix tailwind-rs-core test failures
• Add missing dependencies to contract-testing
• Set up coverage monitoring CI/CD
• Create test templates for missing coverage areas

Week 2: Zero Coverage Areas

• Implement signal management tests (0% → 90%)
• Implement compatibility test coverage (0% → 90%)
• Implement test utilities coverage (0% → 90%)
• Validate coverage improvements

Week 3: Component Implementation Coverage

• Button component tests (30.6% → 90%)
• Input component tests (23.7% → 90%)
• Card component tests (71.4% → 90%)
• New York variant tests (0% → 90%)

Week 4: Advanced Coverage

• Error handling and edge cases
• Performance edge cases
• Integration testing
• Coverage validation and reporting

Week 5: Quality Assurance

• Coverage threshold validation (90%+)
• Test quality review
• Performance impact assessment
• Documentation updates

Week 6: Monitoring and Maintenance

• Set up automated coverage reporting
• Create coverage trend monitoring
• Establish coverage maintenance procedures
• Team training on coverage best practices

🛠️ Technical Implementation

Test Generation Strategy

# 1. Automated Test Generation
cargo test --package leptos-shadcn-button --lib -- --nocapture

# 2. Coverage-Driven Development
cargo llvm-cov --package leptos-shadcn-button --html --open

# 3. Continuous Coverage Monitoring
cargo llvm-cov --package leptos-shadcn-button --lcov --output-path button-coverage.lcov

Coverage Monitoring Setup

# .github/workflows/coverage.yml
name: Coverage Monitoring
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
  coverage:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Install Rust
        uses: actions-rs/toolchain@v1
      - name: Install cargo-llvm-cov
        run: cargo install cargo-llvm-cov
      - name: Run coverage
        run: cargo llvm-cov --lcov --output-path coverage.lcov
      - name: Upload coverage
        uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3

📊 Success Metrics

Coverage Targets

• Overall Coverage: 90%+ (from 62.5%)
• Component Implementations: 90%+ (from 23.7-71.4%)
• Signal Management: 90%+ (from 0%)
• Compatibility Tests: 90%+ (from 0%)
• Test Utilities: 90%+ (from 0%)

Quality Metrics

• Test Execution Time: < 5 minutes for full suite
• Test Reliability: 100% pass rate
• Coverage Stability: < 2% variance between runs
• Documentation Coverage: 100% of public APIs

🔧 Tools and Automation

Coverage Tools

# Primary coverage tool
cargo install cargo-llvm-cov

# Coverage analysis
cargo llvm-cov --html --open
cargo llvm-cov --lcov --output-path coverage.lcov

# Coverage reporting
cargo llvm-cov --json --output-path coverage.json

Test Generation Tools

# Property-based testing
cargo add proptest

# Snapshot testing
cargo add insta

# Mock testing
cargo add mockall

📈 Expected Outcomes

Coverage Improvements

• Total Lines Covered: 2,562+ (from 1,780)
• Coverage Percentage: 90%+ (from 62.5%)
• Uncovered Lines: < 285 (from 1,067)
• Test Count: 200+ additional tests

Quality Improvements

• Bug Detection: Improved early detection of regressions
• Code Confidence: Higher confidence in refactoring
• Documentation: Better understanding of component behavior
• Maintainability: Easier maintenance and debugging

Risk Mitigation

⚠️ Potential Risks

1. Test Maintenance Overhead

   • Mitigation: Automated test generation and maintenance tools
   • Monitoring: Regular test suite performance reviews

2. Performance Impact

   • Mitigation: Parallel test execution and optimized test data
   • Monitoring: Continuous performance monitoring

3. False Coverage

   • Mitigation: Quality-focused test design and regular reviews
   • Monitoring: Coverage quality metrics and peer reviews

🎯 Success Criteria

• Achieve 90%+ overall coverage
• All critical components have 90%+ coverage
• Zero coverage areas eliminated
• Test suite runs in < 5 minutes
• 100% test pass rate maintained
• Coverage monitoring automated
• Team trained on coverage best practices

Conclusion

This remediation plan provides a systematic approach to achieving 90%+ test coverage across the leptos-shadcn-ui repository. By focusing on critical infrastructure fixes, zero coverage areas, and component implementation coverage, we can significantly improve code quality and maintainability.

The 6-week timeline provides a realistic path to achieving comprehensive coverage while maintaining code quality and development velocity. Regular monitoring and quality assurance ensure that coverage improvements translate to actual quality improvements.

---

Plan created on September 15, 2024 - Target completion: October 27, 2024