Files
leptos-shadcn-ui/docs/architecture/coverage-remediation-plan.md
Peter Hanssens 7a36292cf9 🚀 Release v0.1.0: WASM-compatible components with tailwind-rs-core v0.4.0
- Fixed compilation errors in menubar, combobox, and drawer packages
- Updated to tailwind-rs-core v0.4.0 and tailwind-rs-wasm v0.4.0 for WASM compatibility
- Cleaned up unused variable warnings across packages
- Updated release documentation with WASM integration details
- Demo working with dynamic color API and Tailwind CSS generation
- All 25+ core components ready for crates.io publication

Key features:
 WASM compatibility (no more tokio/mio dependencies)
 Dynamic Tailwind CSS class generation
 Type-safe color utilities
 Production-ready component library
2025-09-16 08:36:13 +10:00

513 lines
14 KiB
Markdown

# Test Coverage Remediation Plan: Achieving 90%+ Coverage
## Executive Summary
This document outlines a comprehensive strategy to achieve 90%+ test coverage across the `leptos-shadcn-ui` repository. Based on the current coverage analysis showing 62.5% overall coverage, this plan identifies critical gaps and provides actionable steps to improve coverage systematically.
## Current State Analysis
### 📊 **Baseline Coverage Metrics**
- **Overall Coverage**: 62.5% (1,780/2,847 lines)
- **Target Coverage**: 90%+ (2,562+ lines)
- **Gap to Close**: 782+ lines (27.5% improvement needed)
### 🎯 **Coverage by Component Type**
| Component Type | Current Coverage | Target Coverage | Priority |
|----------------|------------------|-----------------|----------|
| TDD Test Suites | 100% | 100% | ✅ Complete |
| Performance Tests | 100% | 100% | ✅ Complete |
| Integration Tests | 96.6% | 100% | 🟡 Low |
| Component Tests | 88.2% | 95% | 🟡 Low |
| Validation Systems | 100% | 100% | ✅ Complete |
| **Component Implementations** | **23.7-71.4%** | **90%+** | 🔴 **Critical** |
| Signal Management | 0% | 90%+ | 🔴 **Critical** |
| Compatibility Tests | 0% | 90%+ | 🔴 **Critical** |
| Test Utilities | 0% | 90%+ | 🔴 **Critical** |
## Phase 1: Critical Infrastructure (Weeks 1-2)
### 🔴 **Priority 1: Fix Compilation Issues**
#### 1.1 Fix `tailwind-rs-core` Test Failures
```bash
# Current Issues:
# - test_tailwind_classes_creation: assertion failed on responsive classes
# - test_class_builder: assertion failed on responsive classes
# - test_validate_class: validation logic issues
# - test_optimize_classes: class optimization problems
# Action Items:
1. Fix responsive class generation in TailwindClasses
2. Update validation patterns for missing utilities
3. Fix class optimization logic
4. Add missing test cases for edge conditions
```
#### 1.2 Fix `contract-testing` Dependencies
```bash
# Add missing dependencies
cargo add anyhow chrono --package leptos-shadcn-contract-testing
# Fix compilation errors in:
# - tdd_expansion.rs (anyhow usage)
# - dependency_contracts.rs (chrono usage)
```
### 🔴 **Priority 2: Zero Coverage Areas**
#### 2.1 Signal Management Coverage (0% → 90%)
**Target Files**: `packages/leptos/button/src/signal_managed.rs`
**Test Strategy**:
```rust
// Add comprehensive tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod signal_managed_tests {
use super::*;
// 1. Signal Creation and Initialization
#[test]
fn test_signal_creation_with_defaults() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_signal_creation_with_custom_values() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Signal Updates and State Changes
#[test]
fn test_signal_update_mechanisms() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_signal_state_transitions() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Memory Management
#[test]
fn test_signal_memory_cleanup() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_signal_arc_management() { /* ... */ }
// 4. Integration with Components
#[test]
fn test_signal_component_integration() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_signal_theme_integration() { /* ... */ }
}
```
#### 2.2 Compatibility Tests Coverage (0% → 90%)
**Target Files**: `packages/leptos/input/src/leptos_v0_8_compatibility_tests.rs`
**Test Strategy**:
```rust
// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod compatibility_tests {
// 1. Attribute System Compatibility
#[test]
fn test_attribute_types_compatibility() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_signal_attribute_handling() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Reserved Keyword Handling
#[test]
fn test_reserved_keyword_attributes() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Version Migration Scenarios
#[test]
fn test_version_migration_edge_cases() { /* ... */ }
}
```
#### 2.3 Test Utilities Coverage (0% → 90%)
**Target Files**: `packages/test-utils/src/`
**Test Strategy**:
```rust
// Add tests for each utility module:
// - component_tester.rs
// - quality_checker.rs
// - property_testing.rs
// - snapshot_testing.rs
#[cfg(test)]
mod test_utils_tests {
// 1. Component Testing Utilities
#[test]
fn test_component_tester_functionality() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Quality Assessment Tools
#[test]
fn test_quality_checker_metrics() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Property-Based Testing
#[test]
fn test_property_testing_framework() { /* ... */ }
// 4. Snapshot Testing
#[test]
fn test_snapshot_testing_utilities() { /* ... */ }
}
```
## Phase 2: Component Implementation Coverage (Weeks 3-4)
### 🟡 **Priority 3: Low Coverage Components**
#### 3.1 Button Component (30.6% → 90%)
**Target Files**: `packages/leptos/button/src/default.rs`
**Missing Coverage Areas**:
```rust
// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod button_implementation_tests {
// 1. Component Rendering Logic
#[test]
fn test_button_rendering_with_all_variants() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_button_rendering_with_all_sizes() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Class Generation Logic
#[test]
fn test_button_class_generation_edge_cases() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_button_class_merging_logic() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Event Handling
#[test]
fn test_button_click_handling() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_button_keyboard_events() { /* ... */ }
// 4. State Management
#[test]
fn test_button_disabled_state() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_button_loading_state() { /* ... */ }
// 5. Error Conditions
#[test]
fn test_button_error_handling() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_button_invalid_props() { /* ... */ }
}
```
#### 3.2 Input Component (23.7% → 90%)
**Target Files**: `packages/leptos/input/src/default.rs`
**Missing Coverage Areas**:
```rust
// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod input_implementation_tests {
// 1. Input Rendering Logic
#[test]
fn test_input_rendering_with_all_types() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_input_rendering_with_validation() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Value Handling
#[test]
fn test_input_value_updates() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_input_value_validation() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Event Handling
#[test]
fn test_input_change_events() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_input_focus_events() { /* ... */ }
// 4. Validation Integration
#[test]
fn test_input_validation_integration() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_input_error_display() { /* ... */ }
}
```
#### 3.3 Card Component (71.4% → 90%)
**Target Files**: `packages/leptos/card/src/default.rs`
**Missing Coverage Areas**:
```rust
// Add tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod card_implementation_tests {
// 1. Card Structure Rendering
#[test]
fn test_card_structure_rendering() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_card_header_footer_rendering() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Content Management
#[test]
fn test_card_content_handling() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_card_empty_state_handling() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Interactive Features
#[test]
fn test_card_interactive_behavior() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_card_click_handling() { /* ... */ }
}
```
### 🟡 **Priority 4: New York Variants (0% → 90%)**
#### 4.1 New York Button Variant
**Target Files**: `packages/leptos/button/src/new_york.rs`
**Test Strategy**:
```rust
#[cfg(test)]
mod new_york_button_tests {
// 1. Variant-Specific Rendering
#[test]
fn test_new_york_button_rendering() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Style Differences
#[test]
fn test_new_york_button_styles() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Behavior Differences
#[test]
fn test_new_york_button_behavior() { /* ... */ }
}
```
## Phase 3: Advanced Coverage (Weeks 5-6)
### 🟢 **Priority 5: Edge Cases and Error Handling**
#### 5.1 Comprehensive Error Testing
```rust
// Add tests for all components:
#[cfg(test)]
mod error_handling_tests {
// 1. Invalid Props
#[test]
fn test_invalid_prop_handling() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Edge Cases
#[test]
fn test_edge_case_scenarios() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Resource Exhaustion
#[test]
fn test_resource_exhaustion_handling() { /* ... */ }
// 4. Concurrent Access
#[test]
fn test_concurrent_access_safety() { /* ... */ }
}
```
#### 5.2 Performance Edge Cases
```rust
// Add performance tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod performance_edge_tests {
// 1. Large Dataset Handling
#[test]
fn test_large_dataset_performance() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Memory Pressure
#[test]
fn test_memory_pressure_handling() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Rapid State Changes
#[test]
fn test_rapid_state_change_performance() { /* ... */ }
}
```
### 🟢 **Priority 6: Integration Coverage**
#### 6.1 Cross-Component Integration
```rust
// Add integration tests for:
#[cfg(test)]
mod integration_tests {
// 1. Component Combinations
#[test]
fn test_button_input_integration() { /* ... */ }
#[test]
fn test_card_form_integration() { /* ... */ }
// 2. Theme System Integration
#[test]
fn test_theme_system_integration() { /* ... */ }
// 3. Signal System Integration
#[test]
fn test_signal_system_integration() { /* ... */ }
}
```
## Implementation Strategy
### 📋 **Week-by-Week Breakdown**
#### **Week 1: Infrastructure Fixes**
- [ ] Fix `tailwind-rs-core` test failures
- [ ] Add missing dependencies to `contract-testing`
- [ ] Set up coverage monitoring CI/CD
- [ ] Create test templates for missing coverage areas
#### **Week 2: Zero Coverage Areas**
- [ ] Implement signal management tests (0% → 90%)
- [ ] Implement compatibility test coverage (0% → 90%)
- [ ] Implement test utilities coverage (0% → 90%)
- [ ] Validate coverage improvements
#### **Week 3: Component Implementation Coverage**
- [ ] Button component tests (30.6% → 90%)
- [ ] Input component tests (23.7% → 90%)
- [ ] Card component tests (71.4% → 90%)
- [ ] New York variant tests (0% → 90%)
#### **Week 4: Advanced Coverage**
- [ ] Error handling and edge cases
- [ ] Performance edge cases
- [ ] Integration testing
- [ ] Coverage validation and reporting
#### **Week 5: Quality Assurance**
- [ ] Coverage threshold validation (90%+)
- [ ] Test quality review
- [ ] Performance impact assessment
- [ ] Documentation updates
#### **Week 6: Monitoring and Maintenance**
- [ ] Set up automated coverage reporting
- [ ] Create coverage trend monitoring
- [ ] Establish coverage maintenance procedures
- [ ] Team training on coverage best practices
### 🛠️ **Technical Implementation**
#### **Test Generation Strategy**
```bash
# 1. Automated Test Generation
cargo test --package leptos-shadcn-button --lib -- --nocapture
# 2. Coverage-Driven Development
cargo llvm-cov --package leptos-shadcn-button --html --open
# 3. Continuous Coverage Monitoring
cargo llvm-cov --package leptos-shadcn-button --lcov --output-path button-coverage.lcov
```
#### **Coverage Monitoring Setup**
```yaml
# .github/workflows/coverage.yml
name: Coverage Monitoring
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
coverage:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Install Rust
uses: actions-rs/toolchain@v1
- name: Install cargo-llvm-cov
run: cargo install cargo-llvm-cov
- name: Run coverage
run: cargo llvm-cov --lcov --output-path coverage.lcov
- name: Upload coverage
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
```
### 📊 **Success Metrics**
#### **Coverage Targets**
- **Overall Coverage**: 90%+ (from 62.5%)
- **Component Implementations**: 90%+ (from 23.7-71.4%)
- **Signal Management**: 90%+ (from 0%)
- **Compatibility Tests**: 90%+ (from 0%)
- **Test Utilities**: 90%+ (from 0%)
#### **Quality Metrics**
- **Test Execution Time**: < 5 minutes for full suite
- **Test Reliability**: 100% pass rate
- **Coverage Stability**: < 2% variance between runs
- **Documentation Coverage**: 100% of public APIs
### 🔧 **Tools and Automation**
#### **Coverage Tools**
```bash
# Primary coverage tool
cargo install cargo-llvm-cov
# Coverage analysis
cargo llvm-cov --html --open
cargo llvm-cov --lcov --output-path coverage.lcov
# Coverage reporting
cargo llvm-cov --json --output-path coverage.json
```
#### **Test Generation Tools**
```bash
# Property-based testing
cargo add proptest
# Snapshot testing
cargo add insta
# Mock testing
cargo add mockall
```
### 📈 **Expected Outcomes**
#### **Coverage Improvements**
- **Total Lines Covered**: 2,562+ (from 1,780)
- **Coverage Percentage**: 90%+ (from 62.5%)
- **Uncovered Lines**: < 285 (from 1,067)
- **Test Count**: 200+ additional tests
#### **Quality Improvements**
- **Bug Detection**: Improved early detection of regressions
- **Code Confidence**: Higher confidence in refactoring
- **Documentation**: Better understanding of component behavior
- **Maintainability**: Easier maintenance and debugging
## Risk Mitigation
### ⚠️ **Potential Risks**
1. **Test Maintenance Overhead**
- **Mitigation**: Automated test generation and maintenance tools
- **Monitoring**: Regular test suite performance reviews
2. **Performance Impact**
- **Mitigation**: Parallel test execution and optimized test data
- **Monitoring**: Continuous performance monitoring
3. **False Coverage**
- **Mitigation**: Quality-focused test design and regular reviews
- **Monitoring**: Coverage quality metrics and peer reviews
### 🎯 **Success Criteria**
- [ ] Achieve 90%+ overall coverage
- [ ] All critical components have 90%+ coverage
- [ ] Zero coverage areas eliminated
- [ ] Test suite runs in < 5 minutes
- [ ] 100% test pass rate maintained
- [ ] Coverage monitoring automated
- [ ] Team trained on coverage best practices
## Conclusion
This remediation plan provides a systematic approach to achieving 90%+ test coverage across the `leptos-shadcn-ui` repository. By focusing on critical infrastructure fixes, zero coverage areas, and component implementation coverage, we can significantly improve code quality and maintainability.
The 6-week timeline provides a realistic path to achieving comprehensive coverage while maintaining code quality and development velocity. Regular monitoring and quality assurance ensure that coverage improvements translate to actual quality improvements.
---
*Plan created on September 15, 2024 - Target completion: October 27, 2024*