## Problem
CI does not pass for the compute release due to the absence of some
images
## Summary of changes
Now we use the images from the old non-compute releases for non-compute
images
## Problem
We intend for cplane to use the heatmap layer download API to warm up
timelines after unarchival. It's tricky for them to recurse in the
ancestors,
and the current implementation doesn't work well when unarchiving a
chain
of branches and warming them up.
## Summary of changes
* Add a `recurse` flag to the API. When the flag is set, the operation
recurses into the parent
timeline after the current one is done.
* Be resilient to warming up a chain of unarchived branches. Let's say
we unarchived `B` and `C` from
the `A -> B -> C` branch hierarchy. `B` got unarchived first. We
generated the unarchival heatmaps
and stash them in `A` and `B`. When `C` unarchived, it dropped it's
unarchival heatmap since `A` and `B`
already had one. If `C` needed layers from `A` and `B`, it was out of
luck. Now, when choosing whether
to keep an unarchival heatmap we look at its end LSN. If it's more
inclusive than what we currently have,
keep it.
## Problem
Storage controller will proxy GETs to pageserver-like tenant/timeline
paths through to the pageserver.
Usually GET passthroughs make sense to go to shard 0, e.g. if you want
to list timelines.
But sometimes you really want to know about a particular shard, e.g.
reading its cache state or similar.
## Summary of changes
- Accept shard IDs as well as tenant IDs in the passthrough route
- Refactor node lookup to take a shard ID and make the tenant ID case a
layer on top of that. This is one more lock take-drop during these
requests, but it's not particularly expensive and these requests
shouldn't be terribly frequent
This is not immediately used by anything, but will be there any time we
want to e.g. do a pass-through query to check the warmth of a tenant
cache on a particular shard or somesuch.
## Problem
layer_map access was unwrapped. It might return an error during
shutdown.
## Summary of changes
Propagate the layer_map access error back to the compaction loop.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/10841 made building compute
and neon images optional on releases that don't need them. The
`push-<component>-image-prod` jobs had transitive dependencies that were
skipped due to that, causing the images not to be pushed to production
registries.
## Summary of changes
Add `!failure() && !cancelled() &&` to the beginning of the conditions
for these jobs to ensure they run even if some of their transitive
dependencies are skipped.
## Problem
We see `Inmem storage overflow` in page server logs:
https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C033RQ5SPDH/p1740157873114339
walked process is using inseam SMGR with storage size limited by 64
pages with warning watermark 32 (based ion the assumption that
XLR_MAX_BLOCK_ID is 32, so WAL record can not access more than 32
pages).
Actually it is not true. We can update up to 3 forks for each block
(including update of FSM and VM forks).
## Summary of changes
This PR increases inseam SMGR size for walled process to 100 pages and
print stack trace in case of overflow.
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
We created extensions in a single database. The tests could interfere,
i.e., discover some service tables left by other extensions and produce
unexpected results.
## Summary of changes
The tests are now run in a separate timeline, so only one extension owns
the database, which prevents interference.
Before this PR, re-attach and validate would log the same warning
```
calling control plane generation validation API failed
```
on retry errors.
This can be confusing.
This PR makes the message generically valid for any upcall and adds
additional tracing spans to capture context.
Along the way, clean up some copy-pasta variable naming.
refs
-
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10381#issuecomment-2684755827
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Lakhin <alexander.lakhin@neon.tech>
## Problem
So far cumulative statistics have not been persisted when Neon scales to
zero (suspends endpoint).
With PR https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/6560 the cumulative
statistics should now survive endpoint restarts and correctly trigger
the auto- vacuum and auto analyze maintenance
So far we did not have a testcase that validates that improvement in our
dev cloud environment with a real project.
## Summary of changes
Introduce testcase `test_cumulative_statistics_persistence`in the
benchmarking workflow running daily to verify:
- Verifies that the cumulative statistics are correctly persisted across
restarts.
- Cumulative statistics are important to persist across restarts because
they are used
- when auto-vacuum an auto-analyze trigger conditions are met.
- The test performs the following steps:
- Seed a new project using pgbench
- insert tuples that by itself are not enough to trigger auto-vacuum
- suspend the endpoint
- resume the endpoint
- insert additional tuples that by itself are not enough to trigger
auto-vacuum but in combination with the previous tuples are
- verify that autovacuum is triggered by the combination of tuples
inserted before and after endpoint suspension
## Test run
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/13546879714/job/37860609089#step:6:282
Migrates the remaining crates to edition 2024. We like to stay on the
latest edition if possible. There is no functional changes, however some
code changes had to be done to accommodate the edition's breaking
changes.
Like the previous migration PRs, this is comprised of three commits:
* the first does the edition update and makes `cargo check`/`cargo
clippy` pass. we had to update bindgen to make its output [satisfy the
requirements of edition
2024](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2024/unsafe-extern.html)
* the second commit does a `cargo fmt` for the new style edition.
* the third commit reorders imports as a one-off change. As before, it
is entirely optional.
Part of #10918
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/10841 broke CI on PRs that
aren't based on main or a release branch but want to merge into another
PR.
## Summary of changes
Replace `run-kind=pr-main` with `run-kind=pr`, so that all PRs that
aren't release PRs are treated equally.
## Problem
safekeepers must ignore walproposer messages with non matching
membership conf.
## Summary of changes
Make safekeepers reject vote request, proposer elected and append
request messages with non matching generation. Switch to the
configuration in the greeting message if it is higher.
In passing, fix one comment and WAL truncation.
Last part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9965
The comment was woefully outdated and outright wrong. It applied a long
time ago (before commit e5cc2f92c4 to be precise), but nowadays the
function just launches postgres and waits until it starts accepting
connections. The other things the comment talked about are done in other
functions.
## Problem
Check neon with extra platform builds is failing on main with:
```
The template is not valid. .github/workflows/neon_extra_builds.yml (Line: 74, Col: 26): Unexpected value 'false'
```
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/13549634905
## Summary of changes
Use `fromJson()` to have `false` as boolean value.
thanks to @skyzh for pointing on the issue
## Problem
Yet another source of flakyness for
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10517
## Summary of changes
The test scenario we want to create is that we have an image layer in
index_part and then overwrite it, so we have to ensure it gets persisted
in index_part by doing a force checkpoint.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
We lost this with the switch to axum for the HTTP server. Add it back.
In addition to just resurrecting the functionality we had before, pass
the tracing context of the /configure HTTP request to the start_postgres
operation that runs in the main thread. This way, the 'start_postgres'
and all its sub-spans like getting the basebackup become children of the
HTTP request span. This allows end-to-end tracing of a compute start,
all the way from the proxy to the SQL queries executed by compute_ctl as
part of compute startup.
## Problem
https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/10241 added configuration
switch endpoint, but it didn't delete timeline if node was excluded.
## Summary of changes
Add separate /exclude API endpoint which similarly accepts membership
configuration where sk is supposed by be excluded. Implementation
deletes the timeline locally.
Some more small related tweaks:
- make mconf switch API PUT instead of POST as it is idempotent;
- return 409 if switch was refused instead of 200 with requested &
current;
- remove unused was_active flag from delete response;
- remove meaningless _force suffix from delete functions names;
- reuse timeline.rs delete_dir function in timelines_global_map instead
of its own copy.
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9965
## Problem
I see a lot of timeout errors, which indicates that this test is too
slow. It seems that create relations are fast, but the subsequent
truncating step is slow.
## Summary of changes
Reduce number of relations for now, and investigate later.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
Release CI is slow, because we're doing unnecessary work, for example
building compute images on storage releases and vice versa.
## Summary of changes
- Extract tag generation into reusable workflow and extend it with
fetching of previous component releases
- Don't build neon images on compute releases and don't build compute
images on proxy and storage releases
- Reuse images from previous releases for tests on branches where we
don't build those images
## Open questions
- We differentiate between `TAG` and `COMPUTE_TAG` in a few places, but
we don't differentiate between storage and proxy releases. Since they
use the same image, this will continue to work, but I'm not sure this is
what we want.
## Problem
ref https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10927
## Summary of changes
* Implement `is_critical` and `is_cancel` over `CompactionError`.
* Revisit all places that uses `CollectKeyspaceError` to ensure they are
handled correctly.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
Delete layers that we have hardlinked so far when there is an error in
`remote_copy`. This prevents a retry of the ancestor detach from
stumbling over already present layer files: the hardlink would fail with
an error.
If there is a crash, we already clean up during the timeline attach: we
loop over all layer files and purge all layers that are not referenced
by the `index_part.json`.
Make sure to hold the timeline gate to prevent races with
detach&attach&read from the layer file.
These cleanups aren't completely enough however, as there is code after
`prepare` as well. To handle errors there, we add a special case for
`AlreadyExists` errors during the hardlink, where we check if the layer
is an orphan, and if yes, we delete it from local disk. That is ideally
not the case we hit, as it is less clear in that scenario where the
layer came from, but it provides good defense in depth.
Related #10729Fixes#10970
## Problem
If the client connection goes dead without an explicit close (e.g. due
to network infrastructure dropping the connection) then we currently
won't detect it for a long time, which may e.g. block GetPage flushes
and keep the task running.
Touches https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/23515.
## Summary of changes
Enable `SO_KEEPALIVE` on the page service socket, to enable periodic TCP
keepalive probes. These are configured via Linux sysctls, which will be
deployed separately. By default, the first probe is sent after 2 hours,
so this doesn't have a practical effect until we change the sysctls.
## Problem
json_ctrl.rs is an obsolete attempt to have tests with fine control of
feeding messages into safekeeper superseded by desim framework.
## Summary of changes
Drop it.
Updates `compute_tools` and `compute_api` crates to edition 2024. We
like to stay on the latest edition if possible. There is no functional
changes, however some code changes had to be done to accommodate the
edition's breaking changes.
The PR has three commits:
* the first commit updates the named crates to edition 2024 and appeases
`cargo clippy` by changing code.
* the second commit performs a `cargo fmt` that does some minor changes
(not many)
* the third commit performs a cargo fmt with nightly options to reorder
imports as a one-time thing. it's completely optional, but I offer it
here for the compute team to review it.
I'd like to hear opinions about the third commit, if it's wanted and
felt worth the diff or not. I think most attention should be put onto
the first commit.
Part of #10918
Ref: https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/24939
## Problem
I found that we are missing authorization for some container jobs, that
will make them use anonymous pulls. It's not an issue for now, with high
enough limits, but that could be an issue when new limits introduced in
DockerHub (10 pulls / hour)
## Summary of changes
- add credentials for the jobs that run in containers
We don't want to serialize to/from string all the time, so use
`SchedulingPolicy` in `SafekeeperPersistence` via the use of a wrapper.
Stacked atop #10891
In local dev environment, these steps take around 100 ms, and they are
in the critical path of a compute startup on a compute pool hit. I don't
know if it's like that in production, but as first step, add tracing
spans to the functions so that they can be measured more easily.
Updates storage components to edition 2024. We like to stay on the
latest edition if possible. There is no functional changes, however some
code changes had to be done to accommodate the edition's breaking
changes.
The PR has two commits:
* the first commit updates storage crates to edition 2024 and appeases
`cargo clippy` by changing code. i have accidentially ran the formatter
on some files that had other edits.
* the second commit performs a `cargo fmt`
I would recommend a closer review of the first commit and a less close
review of the second one (as it just runs `cargo fmt`).
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10918
## Problem
PR https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/10442 added prefetch_lookup
function.
It changed handling of getpage requests in compute.
Before:
1. Lookup in LFC (return if found)
2. Register prefetch buffer
3. Wait prefetch result (increment getpage_hist)
Now:
1. Lookup prefetch ring (return if prefetch request is already
completed)
2. Lookup in LFC (return if found)
3. Register prefetch buffer
4. Wait prefetch result (increment getpage_hist)
So if prefetch result is already available, then get page histogram is
not incremented.
It case failure of some test_throughtput benchmarks:
https://neondb.slack.com/archives/C033RQ5SPDH/p1740425527249499
## Summary of changes
Increment getpage histogram in `prefetch_lookup`
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@neon.tech>
## Problem
`neon endpoint list` shows a different LSN than what the state of the
replica is. This is mainly down to what we define as LSN in this output.
If we define it as the LSN that a compute was started with, it only
makes sense to show it for static computes.
## Summary of changes
Removed the output of `last_record_lsn` for primary/hot standby
computes.
Closes: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/5825
---------
Co-authored-by: Tristan Partin <tristan@neon.tech>
## Problem
The patch for `semver` extensions relies on `PG_VERSION` environment
variable. The files were named without the letter `v` so script cannot
find them.
## Summary of changes
The patch files were renamed.
## Problem
part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9114
## Summary of changes
Add the auto trigger for gc-compaction. It computes two values: L1 size
and L2 size. When L1 size >= initial trigger threshold, we will trigger
an initial gc-compaction. When l1_size / l2_size >=
gc_compaction_ratio_percent, we will trigger the "tiered" gc-compaction.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
We have `test_perf_many_relations` but it only runs on remote clusters,
and we cannot directly modify tenant config. Therefore, I patched one of
the current tests to benchmark relv2 performance.
close https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/9986
## Summary of changes
* Add `v1/v2` selector to `test_tx_abort_with_many_relations`.
---------
Signed-off-by: Alex Chi Z <chi@neon.tech>
## Problem
We use `docker cp` to copy the files required for the extension tests
now.
It causes problems if we run older images with the newer source tree.
## Summary of changes
Copying the files was moved to the compute Dockerfile.
## Problem
As part of https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/8614 we need to
pass membership configurations between compute and safekeepers.
## Summary of changes
Add version 3 of the protocol carrying membership configurations.
Greeting message in both sides gets full conf, and other messages
generation number only. Use protocol bump to include other accumulated
changes:
- stop packing whole structs on the wire as is;
- make the tag u8 instead of u64;
- send all ints in network order;
- drop proposer_uuid, we can pass it in START_WAL_PUSH and it wasn't
much useful anyway.
Per message changes, apart from mconf:
- ProposerGreeting: tenant / timeline id is sent now as hex cstring.
Remove proto version, it is passed outside in START_WAL_PUSH. Remove
postgres timeline, it is unused. Reorder fields a bit.
- AcceptorGreeting: reorder fields
- VoteResponse: timeline_start_lsn is removed. It can be taken from
first member of term history, and later we won't need it at all when all
timelines will be explicitly created. Vote itself is u8 instead of u64.
- ProposerElected: timeline_start_lsn is removed for the same reasons.
- AppendRequest: epoch_start_lsn removed, it is known from term history
in ProposerElected.
Both compute and sk are able to talk v2 and v3 to make rollbacks (in
case we need them) easier; neon.safekeeper_proto_version GUC sets the
client version. v2 code can be dropped later.
So far empty conf is passed everywhere, future PRs will handle them.
To test, add param to some tests choosing proto version; we want to test
both 2 and 3 until we fully migrate.
ref https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/issues/10326
---------
Co-authored-by: Arthur Petukhovsky <petuhovskiy@yandex.ru>
## Problem
The interpreted WAL reader tracks the start of the current logical
batch.
This needs to be invalidated when the reader is reset.
This bug caused a couple of WAL gap alerts in staging.
## Summary of changes
* Refactor to make it possible to write a reproducer
* Add repro unit test
* Fix by resetting the start with the reader
Related https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/23935
